People with common sense and wisdom make the right choice and, this way, stop the evil ones to drag the world more into quagmire. I believe you are one of those good people.

I appreciate that though perhaps not so much deserved. Maybe it's humility.

I'm just a little punk in a corner of the world trying to make sense out of things.

What is good is that people like you can recognize goodness in others despite their background. That gives me hope.

Be well, my friend.

__________________

My thesis is that our backgrounds, whatever it may be, cannot/should not affect the humane connection between us. God created the world into tribes to give us the chance to "interact with each other." Being Jew is not a label on the forehead just like being a Muslim is not a bandage on the arm. Our particilar religions are not the reason for hostility but, rather, a source of understanding and learning/exploring chance. I very much appreciate the ability of being able to talk to the reasonable people all across the world.

Quite a Talmudic display of vulgarity; apparently I spoke too soon in your defence? Even I am wrong once in awhile...

Hey, I'm an advocate of free speech. He wants to call me a Kyke, I'll tell him what I think of it.

Nothing "Talmudic" about it all. I don't follow the Talmud nor am I Torah observant.

So, let me ask you, do you think it's okay for him to be derogatory without a response from me? Like I said earlier, I reserve the right to call out a racist when I see it.

Was it vulgar? Sure, I am human and can display emotions like everyone else - even for a Jew!

__________________

I am glad that you are an advocate of free speech; I never called for you to be silenced but freedom of speech does not mean freedom from speech.

The sexual vulgarity struck me as "Talmudic" (Tractate Gittin Folio 57a came to mind) and this may not mean much but many self-professed Jews that I have debated (if not the majority) tend to become extremely sexually vulgar when angered.

Technically neither of you are permitted to behave like this on USPOL due to forum rules but I do believe that you have the right to respond to attacks. I have also tried to encourage Brett to clean things up if he wants to be taken seriously.

However, while I respect your right to respond I have that same privilege...

Yep; it was vulgar but indeed a provoked response...

I wouldn't read too much into it. I don't concern myself too much with someone's status as a conservative, liberal or whatever. I'm more interested in other attributes like character, judgment, leadership ability, etc.

Back to the OP ... I have a question for Brett: Do you agree with the reporter that Ron Paul is an anti-Semite?

He's a righteous goy, eh jew ??

Since you're not a religious jew, does that mean you don't believe jews are God's chosen people. (gasp !!!) If so, then tell these Judeo-Christians that the dead-kike-on-a-stick ain't coming back so they'll stop looking up.

Hell man, he's named the neo-con jews, the jews who originated and established the neo-con jewish strategy, and he's named all 5 jewish governors of the Federal Reserve Bank, as well as every single jewish chairman since the Federal Reserve came into being. Which means, he knows jews are responsible for the bankrupting of America, and for all neo-con wars, including WWI and WWII. Of course, he's an anti-semite. And so is every politician in Washington. They're just either too terrified of the jews to admit it, or else they're working for the goddamned kikes and therefore can live quietly with their own anti-semitism. Deep down, the Kennedy's, for example, hate the kikes just as much as I do.

Now be a good lad, and go spend some time at The Official Website of Representative David Duke, PhD, where jewish poisons will be removed from your head.

That being the case, I wonder why you consider his being called an anti-Semite newsworthy. You seemed to be complaining about it in the OP.

Very good question, F.D. And a fair one.

By being in control of the media, thusly being able to establish perceptions among the masses, the jews have succeeded in making the word "anti-semite" synonamous with the word "evil" among the masses. Consequently, most individuals cringe when they hear it. Alarm bells go off inside their heads warning them of danger. Alarm bells put there by the jewsmedia. And so, when the jewsmedia calls someone an anti-semite, the programmed masses automatically dispise that person. They look upon him or her as evil.

The charge of anti-semitism is a powerful weapon used by jews to discredit and even destroy the careers and reputations of critics of jews and Israel.

Personally, I admit I'm an anti-semite just to spite the goddamned jews, and to satisfy my own honest conscience. Ron Paul OTOH, is a presidential candidate, therefore he not only tries to win over the masses, but in order to win them over while getting his honest message to them at the same time, he naturally feels the need to deny he's an anti-semite for the aforementioned reason. Therefore, instead of calling them jews, he calls them neo-cons while repeating the names of the big neo-con jews, over and over again. He does the same regarding Federal Reserve Bank governors and media moguls, as well. Many thousands of his supporters are consequently becoming jew-wise anti-semites, as a result of Dr Paul and after digging into the ethnicities of the neo-cons and other subversives whose names Dr Paul provides them.

As I said, Dr David Duke is the world's best living authority on the jewish menace. The Official Website of Representative David Duke, PhD and White Civil Rights. And the largest internet forum (over 100,000 members) for open minded White people is Stormfront White Nationalist Community - Discussion Board for Activists. My phone number btw is: 417-463-7703. My name is Glenn Miller. Websites: Glenn Miller for Congress and Welcome To The White Patriot Party