Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Breaking News in Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 10,571

United_States    
Re: unintended consequence of w's presidency

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speakeasy View Post
The protests by Fred Phelps were done on public property near the cemeteries where soldiers are buried. Although terrible, they aren't breaking any laws.

Wrong. The ACLU attacked government sponsorship of the Boy Scouts of America, because of their religious discrimination (no homosexuals or atheists are allowed in the organization). Not once, that I'm familiar with, did the ACLU try and force the Boy Scouts to admit homosexuals or atheists.
Exactly my point. The ACLU is trying to remove any expression of religion from organizations, wheras the constitution, IMO, protects organizations religious freedom. There is no reason the govt cant sponsor a religious organization, as along as all religious organizations have the same opportunity.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008
drgoodtrips's Avatar
drgoodtrips drgoodtrips is offline
Moderator
Feel the power of the dark side.

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 18,021

   
Re: unintended consequence of w's presidency

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Exactly my point. The ACLU is trying to remove any expression of religion from organizations, wheras the constitution, IMO, protects organizations religious freedom. There is no reason the govt cant sponsor a religious organization, as along as all religious organizations have the same opportunity.
You don't see anything wrong with your tax dollars being used to fund religious outfits? Would you object to being forced to pay for the Scientology Alien-fest?
__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 13,950

United_States     Russian

Re: unintended consequence of w's presidency

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
You don't see anything wrong with your tax dollars being used to fund religious outfits? Would you object to being forced to pay for the Scientology Alien-fest?
How about paying for my Santa Claus Church?
__________________
A federal judge ruled today that graphic pictures of detainee abuse at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison must be released over government claims that they could damage America's image.

Someone should tell them that bad press can be prevented by not abusing prisoners in the first place. Censorship is only needed to preserve the good reputation of those who have tortured and/or murdered already.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008
Speakeasy's Avatar
Speakeasy Speakeasy is offline
Moderator
Suddenly. Amazons. Everywhere.

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Herndon, Virginia
Posts: 17,497

United_States     Virginia

Re: unintended consequence of w's presidency

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Exactly my point. The ACLU is trying to remove any expression of religion from organizations, wheras the constitution, IMO, protects organizations religious freedom. There is no reason the govt cant sponsor a religious organization, as along as all religious organizations have the same opportunity.
And you don't think that Atheists and homosexuals and assorted non-Christians might have a problem with their tax money going to an organization that completely excludes them?
__________________
"Anyone that needs what they want, and doesn’t want what they need
I want nothing to do with
And to do what I want
And to do what I please
Is first on my to-do list
"
-Gnarls Barkley, "Going On" lyrics
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008
Donkey_Left's Avatar
Donkey_Left Donkey_Left is online now
President
Sinner

 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 12,622

United_States     Colombia

Re: unintended consequence of w's presidency

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speakeasy View Post
I'm not sure what the problem is here. She was not silenced, she did was not thrown in jail, none of her civil liberties were violated, what is the ACLU supposed to do? The University has every right to fire employees if they feel there actions run counter to the ideals of the University.

I work for a milk co-op. If I started writing articles saying how milk is the worst thing in the world, even a private citizen, I could very well be disciplined and fired from my job.
Plus I would make a few phone calls and have you "talked to."


The way I see the ACLU is that they are there to push the boundaries. I highly doubt that most, if any, of people who work for the ACLU actually support the activities of NAMBLA. In fact, I would lay a lot of money on the bet that they are probably wholly repulsed by them.

But they have to push the boundaries. They are part of the process that draws the societal line. If it wasn't for people like them our rights would just shrink and shrink because there'd be no push-back.
__________________
"Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God."
Matthew 5:9
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008
pramjockey's Avatar
pramjockey pramjockey is offline
OMG!
Non-wussy liberal

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 12,906

Scotland     Colorado

Re: unintended consequence of w's presidency

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donkey_Left View Post
The way I see the ACLU is that they are there to push the boundaries. I highly doubt that most, if any, of people who work for the ACLU actually support the activities of NAMBLA. In fact, I would lay a lot of money on the bet that they are probably wholly repulsed by them.

But they have to push the boundaries. They are part of the process that draws the societal line. If it wasn't for people like them our rights would just shrink and shrink because there'd be no push-back.
Damn well said, DL. That's an important point that I've not seen raised before, but I do think is critical.
__________________
So many cowards.

You know who you are.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 05-21-2008
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 10,571

United_States    
Re: unintended consequence of w's presidency

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
You don't see anything wrong with your tax dollars being used to fund religious outfits? Would you object to being forced to pay for the Scientology Alien-fest?
I do see something wrong with funding orgs like the Boy Scouts, but not because of religion. I dont think the federal govt should be involved in funding any private groups. However I disagree with the ACLUs position that the govt shouldnt be funding them because they are religiously based.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 05-21-2008
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 10,571

United_States    
Re: unintended consequence of w's presidency

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speakeasy View Post
And you don't think that Atheists and homosexuals and assorted non-Christians might have a problem with their tax money going to an organization that completely excludes them?
Of course I think that. People from every group have a problem with what their tax money is spent on. I just dont like the ACLU picking on the Boy Scouts, one of the most positive boys organizations out there, simply because they are based in religion.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 05-21-2008
Speakeasy's Avatar
Speakeasy Speakeasy is offline
Moderator
Suddenly. Amazons. Everywhere.

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Herndon, Virginia
Posts: 17,497

United_States     Virginia

Re: unintended consequence of w's presidency

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Of course I think that. People from every group have a problem with what their tax money is spent on. I just dont like the ACLU picking on the Boy Scouts, one of the most positive boys organizations out there, simply because they are based in religion.
Well, technically, they were picking on the government, not the Boy Scouts.

From what I understand, the original lawsuit was against the Portland Public School System for allowing the Boy Scouts to come in and speak to the students and attempt to recruit them into their organization. They fastened bracelets to all the male students with text on them urging their parents to sign them up. Of course, there were a number of students who were ineligible to join due to religious reasons. The original lawsuit against the school did not seek any monetary settlement, it simply requested that the public school system stop allowing a religious based organization to come in and try to recruit students. They didn't.
__________________
"Anyone that needs what they want, and doesn’t want what they need
I want nothing to do with
And to do what I want
And to do what I please
Is first on my to-do list
"
-Gnarls Barkley, "Going On" lyrics

Last edited by Speakeasy; 05-21-2008 at 07:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 05-21-2008
AjaxPress's Avatar
AjaxPress AjaxPress is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 3,856

United_States     Ethiopia

Re: unintended consequence of w's presidency

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Of course I think that. People from every group have a problem with what their tax money is spent on. I just dont like the ACLU picking on the Boy Scouts, one of the most positive boys organizations out there, simply because they are based in religion.
You seem to have trouble grasping the problem.

Boy Scouts weren't targeted because of their religion. They were targeted because the religion discriminates against gays and atheist and were getting tax payer dollars.

It's really hard to make things more clear, unless you're being deliberately hebetudinous.
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 05-21-2008
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 10,571

United_States    
Re: unintended consequence of w's presidency

Quote:
Originally Posted by AjaxPress View Post
You seem to have trouble grasping the problem.

Boy Scouts weren't targeted because of their religion. They were targeted because the religion discriminates against gays and atheist and were getting tax payer dollars.

It's really hard to make things more clear, unless you're being deliberately hebetudinous.
That may be your beleif, but it isnt mine. The ACLU has a history of using legal means to interrupt govt sponsorship of specifically christian oriented organizations. Its just nice to see that the courts have so far backed up those organizations rights to choose their own membership and associate freely.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 05-21-2008
timj219's Avatar
timj219 timj219 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 4,540

United_States     New_York

Re: unintended consequence of w's presidency

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
That may be your beleif, but it isnt mine. The ACLU has a history of using legal means to interrupt govt sponsorship of specifically christian oriented organizations. Its just nice to see that the courts have so far backed up those organizations rights to choose their own membership and associate freely.
ACLU also has a history of defending religious people and groups whose rights are being denied by government agencies. That's what they do. They defend civil liberties regardless of whose civil liberties they are. By necessity they sometimes defend and sometimes fight against christian oriented organizations.
__________________
The most important political office is that of private citizen.
Louis D. Brandeis - First Jewish Supreme Court Justice
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008
wrxsti wrxsti is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Blue State
Posts: 1,081

   
Re: unintended consequence of w's presidency

Quote:
Originally Posted by timj219 View Post
ACLU also has a history of defending religious people and groups whose rights are being denied by government agencies. That's what they do. They defend civil liberties regardless of whose civil liberties they are. By necessity they sometimes defend and sometimes fight against christian oriented organizations.
That may be true, but the US is a Christian based nation, therfore any actions againts the Christian faith are inherently anti-American. If the ACLU wants to get off on attacking a religion, they should go after the Muslims; no one will complain.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 10,571

United_States    
Re: unintended consequence of w's presidency

I would complain if they continued attacking any religion simply because it is a religion. The ACLU is anti religion, not anti-american.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008
timj219's Avatar
timj219 timj219 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 4,540

United_States     New_York

Re: unintended consequence of w's presidency

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
I would complain if they continued attacking any religion simply because it is a religion. The ACLU is anti religion, not anti-american.
The ACLU record clearly shows the organization is in fact not anti religion. ACLU has repeatedly represented many religious (mostly christian) organizations over the years from Jerry Falwell to christian student groups to the interfaith needs network.

Your continued repetition of this obviously false accusation is reminiscent of your inability to come to terms with the lack of WMD in Iraq. It appears once you hear a story and make it part of your belief system, no amount of evidence will ever cause you to abandon it.
__________________
The most important political office is that of private citizen.
Louis D. Brandeis - First Jewish Supreme Court Justice
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online