Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Breaking News in Politics
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Breaking News in Politics A forum to discuss what is going on in the political world today.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008
drgoodtrips's Avatar
Moderator
Feel the power of the dark side.

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 21,912

   
Re: Charging rape victims--Palin/Obama/Biden/McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
has anyone ever been billed in Wasilla? One must imagine at some point they were, but it would be nice to know if there are victims out there that have.
Well, that's the rub. I'd imagine that anyone who was raped and couldn't afford it (i.e. didn't have insurance) just get the rape to herself. The only way you might hear about something like that is if an uninsured woman didn't know that she would wind up being billed. Then you'd probably have an incident report with the woman declining to press charges.
__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008
andy764383's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: The U.S.
Posts: 1,281

   
Re: Charging rape victims--Palin/Obama/Biden/McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by O'Sullivan Bere View Post
I'd agree that Knowles is not an unbiased source as he was a Democrat governor; however, the dispute can be confirmed as accurate because of the original reporting of the event back in 2000 when he signed the law to stop what was going on in Wasilla, and Wasilla's opposition to that law, and their respective supportive and objecting positions on that law:

: Knowles signs sexual assault bill

- Frontiersman

That's the article in the local Wasilla area news at that time.

There is no way Knowles could have 'fixed' this against Palin for today because it happened in 2000, he was the AK Governor then and Palin was the Wasilla town mayor then. Neither Knowles nor Palin would have known or foreseen that she would now, in 2008, be the VP nominee. Some things just are what they are, and it's the case here.

In a hyperpartisan political environment I like to look at all the facts. It's curious that this particular web page says:

Quote:
Last Updated on Monday, May 22, 2000 - 09:00:00 pm AKDT
And
Quote:
Published on Monday, May 22, 2000 9:00 PM AKDT

JO C. GOODE / The Frontiersman / May 23, 2000
But...

There are 57 comments total but not a single one until:

Quote:
serena kitt wrote on Sep 8, 2008 5:26 PM
I smell a rat, but lets let this story develop further before we make judgments.

And to reiterate, these are statements from someone besides Palin. Let's see what others dig up.
__________________
Andy
Cynical Optimist
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 15,400

United_States    
Re: Charging rape victims--Palin/Obama/Biden/McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJG View Post
I suggest next time you should read further in. I was a bit confused myself with this post since it seemed very un-CMS. Scrolling down a couple posts would reveal my suspicions to be true. He was either joking or being Sarcastic. Of course you can't convey emotions so easily in a thread without the use of a helpful hint such as an emote. You should try more to understand the reasons behind their post before you jump to conclusions. IMO you do that too quickly and too frequently.
As Matt is certainly a fascinating person.....................

The topic of the thread is sexual assault victims paying for their forensic tests.

Is it possible for you to actually stay on topic? You may not think this topic of paying for sexual assault tests is more important than commenting on Matt's person.

Last edited by O'Sullivan Bere; 09-11-2008 at 07:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008
drgoodtrips's Avatar
Moderator
Feel the power of the dark side.

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 21,912

   
Re: Charging rape victims--Palin/Obama/Biden/McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by andy764383 View Post
In a hyperpartisan political environment I like to look at all the facts. It's curious that this particular web page says:


And

But...

There are 57 comments total but not a single one until:



I smell a rat, but lets let this story develop further before we make judgments.

And to reiterate, these are statements from someone besides Palin. Let's see what others dig up.
FWIW, I think it was a while after 2000 (with the advent of web 2.0) that "comments" became standard fare for any and every web page you might possibly find. This is probably related to disk space as maintaining a comments log requires a dedicated database whereas simply posting news clips or stories does not.
__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008
andy764383's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: The U.S.
Posts: 1,281

   
Re: Charging rape victims--Palin/Obama/Biden/McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
FWIW, I think it was a while after 2000 (with the advent of web 2.0) that "comments" became standard fare for any and every web page you might possibly find. This is probably related to disk space as maintaining a comments log requires a dedicated database whereas simply posting news clips or stories dose not.
Yes, but it's curious even so.

The point is, this story has been reported from only one side. There are a lot of assumptions being made about Palin's position on this based on statements other people have made.
__________________
Andy
Cynical Optimist
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 15,400

United_States    
Re: Charging rape victims--Palin/Obama/Biden/McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by andy764383 View Post
Yes, but it's curious even so.

The point is, this story has been reported from only one side. There are a lot of assumptions being made about Palin's position on this based on statements other people have made.
I'm really trying to find some way that this is justifiable. Even if she says she didn't know about it, that reflects poorly on her mayoral skills. If it's not true, that is the only way I can think that one could, forgive me, put lipstick on this pig*.



*pig means the issue, not her.
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008
drgoodtrips's Avatar
Moderator
Feel the power of the dark side.

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 21,912

   
Re: Charging rape victims--Palin/Obama/Biden/McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by andy764383 View Post
Yes, but it's curious even so.

The point is, this story has been reported from only one side. There are a lot of assumptions being made about Palin's position on this based on statements other people have made.
I'm with Si Modo. I'm trying to conceive of a way that the best case scenario here isn't obliviousness/cluelessness. That's certainly not as distressing, but it isn't exactly a positive.

Though, I am/would be curious to hear her side of it.
__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008
AJG's Avatar
AJG AJG is offline
Secretary of Defense
-(.::@o@::.)-

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Home of the Gay
Posts: 2,766

Massachusetts     United_States

Re: Charging rape victims--Palin/Obama/Biden/McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by Si modo View Post
As Matt is certainly a fascinating person.....................

The topic of the thread is sexual assault victims paying for their forensic tests.

Is it possible for you to actually stay on topic? You may not think this topic of paying for sexual assault tests is more important than commenting on Matt's person, but others would prefer to read past this garbage of yours.

Now I know why the practice of having a children's table is still in existence today.

Updated the quote before you responded I think. I don't usually comment on persons, but if it is related to their posting habits, I might just do that (as Matt has done which I usually have no objection). I usually read through comments before I post about the actual topic. I like to stay up to date just incase I post something that would seem pointless or ridiculous if say there was an update worthy of noting.
__________________
"Hard work without talent is a shame, but talent without hard work is a tragedy." -fortune cookie
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,556

   
Re: Charging rape victims--Palin/Obama/Biden/McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorpMediaSux View Post
Because the McCain campaign, and she, sold herself that way. It wasn't true. Welcome to politics.

Why would that matter. If it was a small amount wouldn't it have been even easier for the town to pay for them? Is your argument that rape victims should have to pay if there's only 10 rapes a year instead of 100. I'd love to see you explain that to those rape victims in person.

Um.....are you serious? Rape doesn't occur there? How can you have charged victims of rape that didn't occur. Please calm down and think.
YOUR REPLY FROM A LIFELONG SMALL TOWN AMERICAN CITIZEN

It's totally obvious that the left wing of the democrat party such as yourself have never seen the workings of government in a very small town.

First of all--will you site just exactly how many rapes over the last 20 or so years occurred in the township of Wasilla?

Since, I am politically involved with my small town here, here is my answer to your ridiculous response:

Within the city council of a small town & at town meetings the conversation centers around infracstructure of the town, & some of how can we fix drainage from running onto private party, along with a couple steady eddie's that show up to complain about Barney Fifes cat getting into their garden. "I know." I haved lived in a small town all my life.

Small town budgets are done yearly--they do not allocate (or set aside) money for things they do not need.

Setting money aside for rape kits in a small town that virtually has no violence would be the equivalent of setting aside money for the protection of tropical palm trees in downtown Wasilla. Of course, Palm trees do not or cannot exist in Wasilla, Alaska.

Once more, in small towns we DO actually take care of our own. Our churches get involved, our neighbors get involved, & we would dole out much more money to a victim of a crime, (typically burgalary) than $300 to $1200 in support. We don't need laws to tell us to do that.

You smear blogger attack liberals are acting like Wasilla, Alaska is the rape captial of the United States. It's another bogus attack on Sarah Palin, based on a remark from a small town policeman or simply put--based on ZERO, NOTHING, NADA.

Last edited by Oreo; 09-11-2008 at 06:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 15,400

United_States    
Re: Charging rape victims--Palin/Obama/Biden/McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
I'm with Si Modo. I'm trying to conceive of a way that the best case scenario here isn't obliviousness/cluelessness. That's certainly not as distressing, but it isn't exactly a positive.

Though, I am/would be curious to hear her side of it.
I think we will. I can't imagine her not having to comment on this. And now that she is doing interviews, perhaps we will get to hear her side soon.
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008
AJG's Avatar
AJG AJG is offline
Secretary of Defense
-(.::@o@::.)-

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Home of the Gay
Posts: 2,766

Massachusetts     United_States

Re: Charging rape victims--Palin/Obama/Biden/McCain

Personally, I don't think this will be a huge issue with the public in its current state. If it is manipulated by the Obama camp so the story is more simple than it actually is, then I think it would might cause the McCain camp some problems. In its current state, I don't think it will be a problem. IMO the only way to make people concerned is to make an honest story into something dishonest.
__________________
"Hard work without talent is a shame, but talent without hard work is a tragedy." -fortune cookie
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,461

   
Re: Charging rape victims--Palin/Obama/Biden/McCain

Quote:
Oreo
First of all--will you site just exactly how many rapes over the last 20 or so years occurred in the township of Wasilla?
OK first of all, your whole post on this topic is over the top, could you chill?

Second that's been addressed by numerous posts in this topic, links have been provided and stats are readily available within them. It's no one's fault if you are unable/unwilling to click on the link and read the information. It seems about 30 rapes were reported over the 20 year period.

Quote:
Within the city council of a small town & at town meetings the conversation centers around infracstructure of the town, & some of how can we fix drainage from running onto private party, along with a couple steady eddie's that show up to complain about Barney Fifes cat getting into their garden. "I know." I haved lived in a small town all my life.
1. If we're going to assume that this level of banality is what takes up the time of a "small town" mayor, doesn't that cut a little bit into her "major executive experience."
2. If these concerns are so small, wouldn't that mean something like the way the police treats rape victims likely to be more important. It seems you want us to believe that small towns aren't that busy and yet also don't make time for these things because it's not "important"? I honestly am confused.

Quote:
Oreo
Small town budgets are done yearly--they do not allocate (or set aside) money for things they do not need.
Setting money aside for rape kits in a small town that virtually has no violence would be the equivalent of setting aside money for the protection of tropical palm trees in downtown Wasilla. Of course, Palm trees do not or cannot exist in Wasilla, Alaska.
This is where your "argument" begins to unravel. It took me exactly two seconds to click on a link that told me there was a pretty consistent number of rapes in Wasilla every year Palin was mayor, between 3-6 generally. Can we assume the mayor is briefed on these kinds of rape statistics? If that's not the case...um why aren't mayors briefed on the crime statistics in their towns. However if mayors ARE briefed on these things setting aside money for rape kits wouldn't be setting aside money for something they "didn't need" because there was a consistent, if small, number of rapes which occured every year. Again, you seem to be saying because there were under 10 rapes a year that these kits were not "needed." Again, I would LOVE for you to say as such to a victim of sexual assault in person.

Quote:
Oreo
Once more, in small towns we DO actually take care of our own. Our churches get involved, our neighbors get involved, & we would dole out much more money to a victim of a crime, (typically burgalary) than $300 to $1200 in support. We don't need laws to tell us to do that
So your argument is that if Sarah Palin knew about this that she merely relied on the other citizens in town to take care of it. And she never took it upon herself to make it a mayoral issue. Um...OK. If that's small town life, then it's small town life. But that convinces me even more that she's not prepared for office. Things don't just "work themselves out" in the big leagues.
__________________
Yesterday, John McCain actually said that if he’s president he’ll take on, and I quote, 'the old boys’ network in Washington.' I’m not making this up. This is somebody been in Congress for 26 years, who put seven of the most powerful Washington lobbyists in charge of his campaign. And now he tells us that he’s the one who’s gonna take on the old boys' network,” he said. “In the McCain campaign that’s called a staff meeting!- Obama, 9/17/2008
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008
Secretary of Defense
Weirdo centrist

 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Democratic Republic of Dublin
Posts: 2,034

Ireland     Israel

Re: Charging rape victims--Palin/Obama/Biden/McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oreo View Post
Small town budgets are done yearly--they do not allocate (or set aside) money for things they do not need.

Setting money aside for rape kits in a small town that virtually has no violence would be the equivalent of setting aside money for the protection of tropical palm trees in downtown Wasilla. Of course, Palm trees do not or cannot exist in Wasilla, Alaska.
If there are so few rapes in small towns, then why would allocating money to investigating them be a problem? After all, they do happen - it is not the equivilent of protecting palm trees in Alaska. That's just offensive. A crime has taken place. The victims deserve justice.
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008
BJA62's Avatar
County Council Member
Purveyor of Common Sense

 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 284

United_States    
Re: Charging rape victims--Palin/Obama/Biden/McCain

The piece of this that is not clear to me is whether the issue ever came up during Palin's time as mayor. Was it policy, but, not enforced? Were any victims actually charged for the kit? I'm not defending the policy by any means. It's ridiculous. But, how much blame, if any, rests on Palin?

And... 10 rapes in a town of about 8000??? WOW! There are serious problems with that.

Anyway, this still would not cause me to vote for Obama. I had problems with McCain before he brought Palin into the fray. I have some problems with some things that have occurred with regard to Palin. But, none of those match my problems with Obama. Lesser of 2 (4?) evils? Yup, absolutely.
__________________
"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." -Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2008
BJA62's Avatar
County Council Member
Purveyor of Common Sense

 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 284

United_States    
Re: Charging rape victims--Palin/Obama/Biden/McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hafke View Post
If there are so few rapes in small towns, then why would allocating money to investigating them be a problem? After all, they do happen - it is not the equivilent of protecting palm trees in Alaska. That's just offensive. A crime has taken place. The victims deserve justice.
I agree. I live in a small town, even smaller than Wasilla, AK. Our town budget is approved in a very, old fashioned, small town manner in which each line in the budget is read, debated and voted in a town meeting. Every citizen in town votes on every line in the budget. Every line in the budget is open for debate in which any town citizen can express concerns, ask questions and even submit changes to the line.

As stated by Hafke, it would not be difficult to approve a budget item for $15,000 for such things. If the funds are not used, they are simply carried over to the next budget.
__________________
"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." -Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online