You know, I could suggest that you look up how much math is involved in anything with that much pressurized gas and water, but I'm guessing you would plead poverty and say "the man" was holding you back.

Will beats socio-economic every time.

__________________
January 21, 2013: The End of an ERROR.

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."
"The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself."
---Benjamin Franklin

It does not say they learn anything about trucks.
This course was about internal fire preventions systems.

You have the burden of proof, and you have not proven much.
The test could still be bogus.
All we know about it indicated that it was.
And we don't know that these tutor did teach any firefighting information.

Wrong.

The books could have been about operating procedures used in different areas that used different equipment.
We have no idea if the experience would be at all useful in New Haven.
The only indication we have, says that it was inappropriate for New Haven.

There is no pressurized gas unless you are talking about CO2 fire extinguishers.

It's a fair bet, though, that you know a fuck of a lot less.

If one thing in this thread is clear, it's that you don't know the first thing about what you're talking about. You've chosen not only to remain ignorant about it, but you continue to post as if you know a single fucking thing about the topic.

You don't.

That's clear...

__________________



For those who have fought to defend it, freedom has a taste the protected will never know...



If it wasn't for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all...

CO2 is the only pressurized gas used in fighting fires?

__________________



For those who have fought to defend it, freedom has a taste the protected will never know...



If it wasn't for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all...

What do you want them to do? List all materials discussed in the course, as well as the actual discussion? It's rather clear when describing what they teach.No, it pretty clearly mentions uniformed fire service members.
Oh yeah, like those regions where gravity works upside down and gasoline puts out fires. It could have been about breeding donkeys for all we know.

However, in order to prove your statement that "The test was blatantly unfair" with the claim "The books could have been about operating procedures used in different areas that used different equipment," you'd actually have to prove that the books WERE about operating procedures of different areas that had totally different operating procedures from the area where the test took place.That's right, you have no fucking idea if it would or would not be useful in New Haven, but you went ahead and concluded that "The test was blatantly unfair," anyway. Thank you for finally admitting that your claim was unsubstantiated bullshit that was based on some of the most horrendously contorted thinking to ever disgrace this forum.

You said "The test was blatantly unfair." So the burden is on you to prove that.I love this logic (or rather, this void of logic)! The test COULD still be bogus, so therefore, it IS blatantly bogus! The guy talking about the truck question COULD have been Elvis's clone, so therefore he IS Elvis's clone! Your argument COULD be full of shit, so therefore it IS full of shit!

Well, okay, that last one has already been proven by other means.Totally! I mean, they could have just had massive orgies every time they met.

Here's a tidbit you apparently don't know - when the fire department arrives to fight a fire in a multi-story building, they hook a pumper into the building's "internal fire prevention systems".

So perhaps, just maybe, knowing about those things would be useful?

Dude, just face it - you're completely wrong. Man up, admit it, and move on.

You're just floundering around on this, way out of your depth.

Matt

You are the one braying about how the test is bogus, not me.

The burden of proof is on you - I've simply been refuting your uninformed statements.

As far as the tutors, it's a pointless and stupid argument. Was there a regulation forbidding tutors? If not, where's the issue?

Matt

Wrong again.

Never heard of Halon? It's in those "internal building systems" you know nothing about. It's also a bit important, as it can kill you if you get caught in it without SCBA.

Never heard of CAFS?

No surprise there, because you don't know what you are talking about.

Matt

You keep harping on the specific type of equipment. This is once again a giant beacon of your ignorance.

Have you ever heard of mutual aid? Do you think trucks ever get replaced?

Right - you have no idea - but you're still screeching about it as if you had a clue.

No, that's just a symptom of your inability to think beyond a single article.

Did you?

Really?

Here; get ready to take a nice big bite:



Here's a list of universities, colleges, and technical schools with firefighting curriculum. This list has 367 of them:

Firefighting

Maybe you need to think long and hard about thinking long and hard...

__________________



For those who have fought to defend it, freedom has a taste the protected will never know...



If it wasn't for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all...

There are specialized halogen systems, etc., but not normally used at firehouses like in New Haven.
These are usually built in systems, or used at special places, like airport, ships, etc.
Why would a potential New Haven fire captain need to know the physics of pressurized gases?