Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Breaking News in Politics
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Breaking News in Politics A forum to discuss what is going on in the political world today.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010
U.S. House Representative

 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 665

   
Justification for war? -Mexico-

Mexico drug hitmen target U.S. consulate staff - Focus on Mexico- msnbc.com

Read the above article. These people were assassinated. Is this considered an act of war? If not would it still be justification to send the military to Mexico to go on a search and destroy mission against these cartels? I am torn on this, but this is serious. I lean towards a search and destroy. I mean it's Mexico. My old high school football team could take over that country. We should not have to allow that to happen.

On the other hand, action like that would open a a serious can of worms that would eventually create another guerrilla war that could last for decades so maybe we should just erect a 20ft steel-reinforced 6ft thick wall on the border with mounted-remote machine gun turrets and kill anything that tries to cross the border?

I don't know. I am mad about this. But really, rationally speaking, how should we deal with this?
__________________
There is no god. Get over it already.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010
WFCY's Avatar
el revolucionario

 
Member Since: Jun 2003
Location: .
Posts: 14,374

   
re: Justification for war? -Mexico-

We should invade Mexico, get Moroco and Marshall Islands on board as "the coalition of the willing", that mother of all coalitions, then start with a B-52 "shock and awe" style carpet bombing (make sure you put enough depleted uraniums in there just cuz them Mexicans breed like rabbits). Before the rubbles settle, we send in ground troops deployed from El Paso with "Operation Mexican Freedom" printed on the flags, the media can embed themselves, and we all start tying yellow ribbons on everything from cars to cats at home. Once those evil terrorist amigos are dead, we can have Obama declare "mission accomplished" on USS Abraham Lincoln. Occupy the country with 160,000 troops, even more contractors, daily suicide bombings and massacres for the next 50+ years to come. Victory shall be ours and God bless America!
__________________
"Déjeme decirle, a riesgo de parecer ridículo, que el revolucionario verdadero está guiado por grandes sentimientos de amor. Es imposible pensar en un revolucionario auténtico sin esta cualidad."

Ernesto 'Che' Guevara.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010
SupPackFan's Avatar
U.S. House Representative
Random Sarcasm

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Superior, WI
Posts: 673

United_States     Wisconsin

re: Justification for war? -Mexico-

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomBlaze View Post
Mexico drug hitmen target U.S. consulate staff - Focus on Mexico- msnbc.com

Read the above article. These people were assassinated. Is this considered an act of war? If not would it still be justification to send the military to Mexico to go on a search and destroy mission against these cartels? I am torn on this, but this is serious. I lean towards a search and destroy. I mean it's Mexico. My old high school football team could take over that country. We should not have to allow that to happen.

On the other hand, action like that would open a a serious can of worms that would eventually create another guerrilla war that could last for decades so maybe we should just erect a 20ft steel-reinforced 6ft thick wall on the border with mounted-remote machine gun turrets and kill anything that tries to cross the border?

I don't know. I am mad about this. But really, rationally speaking, how should we deal with this?
Though I am all for protecting the southern US border, this is not justification to start shooting illegal immigrants. The Mexican government is openly angry about these acts and actively working with our intelligence agencies to stop these drug cartels. Therefore, even in anger, we cannot quite justify invading Mexico yet. Trust me, they will miss our travel money more than we will struggle to find another place to vacation. They are completely on our side.
__________________
The (almost)Great SupPackFan Quotes:
"The more times you drive over a cat - the flatter it gets!"
"Differentiating legal and illegal immigration is as critical as separating child adoption from child abduction."

Drive Bias
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010
SupPackFan's Avatar
U.S. House Representative
Random Sarcasm

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Superior, WI
Posts: 673

United_States     Wisconsin

re: Justification for war? -Mexico-

Quote:
Originally Posted by WFCY View Post
We should invade Mexico, get Moroco and Marshall Islands on board as "the coalition of the willing", that mother of all coalitions, then start with a B-52 "shock and awe" style carpet bombing (make sure you put enough depleted uraniums in there just cuz them Mexicans breed like rabbits). Before the rubbles settle, we send in ground troops deployed from El Paso with "Operation Mexican Freedom" printed on the flags, the media can embed themselves, and we all start tying yellow ribbons on everything from cars to cats at home. Once those evil terrorist amigos are dead, we can have Obama declare "mission accomplished" on USS Abraham Lincoln. Occupy the country with 16,000 troops, even more contractors, daily suicide bombings and massacres for the next 50+ years to come. Victory shall be ours and God bless America!
Clever!
__________________
The (almost)Great SupPackFan Quotes:
"The more times you drive over a cat - the flatter it gets!"
"Differentiating legal and illegal immigration is as critical as separating child adoption from child abduction."

Drive Bias
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 26,266

United_States    
re: Justification for war? -Mexico-

I was wondering when they would get around to us.

Calderon's offensive against the cartels is still in an/at iffy phase, and perhaps, a tipping point.

In the last 36 hours, the other day 5 cops were shot plus I think it was as many as 8 civilians as well killed in, of all places Acapulco on the verge of spring break to boot.

Several border towns have been announced as unfriendly, even by Mexican authorities, translation- they are no go zones, of you go there you're truly on your own.

I don't even know what 'winning' would like for Calderon, I am not sure he does either.

Frankly lets say they did hose down the embassy and/or kill a few workers as they leave for the day, say an American consulate member and American national...what really could we do? Call Pershing back from the dead?
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."

Bis interimitur qui suis armis perit...
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 26,266

United_States    
re: Justification for war? -Mexico-

Quote:
Originally Posted by SupPackFan View Post
Clever!
tiresome...
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."

Bis interimitur qui suis armis perit...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010
pramjockey's Avatar
Be excellent to eachother
Scruffy-looking nerf herder

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 22,602

Scotland     Colorado

re: Justification for war? -Mexico-

Quote:
Originally Posted by WFCY View Post
We should invade Mexico, get Moroco and Marshall Islands on board as "the coalition of the willing", that mother of all coalitions, then start with a B-52 "shock and awe" style carpet bombing (make sure you put enough depleted uraniums in there just cuz them Mexicans breed like rabbits). Before the rubbles settle, we send in ground troops deployed from El Paso with "Operation Mexican Freedom" printed on the flags, the media can embed themselves, and we all start tying yellow ribbons on everything from cars to cats at home. Once those evil terrorist amigos are dead, we can have Obama declare "mission accomplished" on USS Abraham Lincoln. Occupy the country with 160,000 troops, even more contractors, daily suicide bombings and massacres for the next 50+ years to come. Victory shall be ours and God bless America!


Win!
__________________


Noli arrogantium iniurias pati
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010
pramjockey's Avatar
Be excellent to eachother
Scruffy-looking nerf herder

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 22,602

Scotland     Colorado

re: Justification for war? -Mexico-

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomBlaze View Post
Mexico drug hitmen target U.S. consulate staff - Focus on Mexico- msnbc.com

Read the above article. These people were assassinated. Is this considered an act of war? If not would it still be justification to send the military to Mexico to go on a search and destroy mission against these cartels? I am torn on this, but this is serious. I lean towards a search and destroy. I mean it's Mexico. My old high school football team could take over that country. We should not have to allow that to happen.

On the other hand, action like that would open a a serious can of worms that would eventually create another guerrilla war that could last for decades so maybe we should just erect a 20ft steel-reinforced 6ft thick wall on the border with mounted-remote machine gun turrets and kill anything that tries to cross the border?

I don't know. I am mad about this. But really, rationally speaking, how should we deal with this?
Rationally speaking - we deal with this by cutting the demand for drugs in the US. We can't invade Mexico. We can't fight this with airstrikes. We need to take away their source of income. That means taking away their market.
__________________


Noli arrogantium iniurias pati
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010
SupPackFan's Avatar
U.S. House Representative
Random Sarcasm

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Superior, WI
Posts: 673

United_States     Wisconsin

re: Justification for war? -Mexico-

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
I was wondering when they would get around to us.

Calderon's offensive against the cartels is still in an/at iffy phase, and perhaps, a tipping point.

In the last 36 hours, the other day 5 cops were shot plus I think it was as many as 8 civilians as well killed in, of all places Acapulco on the verge of spring break to boot.

Several border towns have been announced as unfriendly, even by Mexican authorities, translation- they are no go zones, of you go there you're truly on your own.

I don't even know what 'winning' would like for Calderon, I am not sure he does either.

Frankly lets say they did hose down the embassy and/or kill a few workers as they leave for the day, say an American consulate member and American national...what really could we do? Call Pershing back from the dead?
Instead of making them criminals for crossing an invisible borderline created by corporate run governments, lets allow people that only wish to earn a decent living to travel freely. If we only do that, give them free healthcare, and admit how evil and imperial the United States has always been - then these desperate people of the drug cartels would stop making millions trafficing coccaine, and instead tar the roofs of buildings in San Diego and Houston for 15 bucks an hour. To hell with NAFTA, quit exporting our jobs, bring those drug cartels . . . er . . . I mean hardworking people here to mow my lawn!

Better?
__________________
The (almost)Great SupPackFan Quotes:
"The more times you drive over a cat - the flatter it gets!"
"Differentiating legal and illegal immigration is as critical as separating child adoption from child abduction."

Drive Bias
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010
O'Sullivan Bere's Avatar
Administrator

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Pennsylvania/Ireland
Posts: 11,105

Pennsylvania     Ireland

re: Justification for war? -Mexico-

Quote:
Originally Posted by pramjockey View Post
Rationally speaking - we deal with this by cutting the demand for drugs in the US. We can't invade Mexico. We can't fight this with airstrikes. We need to take away their source of income. That means taking away their market.
You're pretty much on it.

These drug gangs terrorise the Mexicans far more than they do inside the US. It's been a vicious bloodbath there for quite awhile. Blaming the Mexicans who are victimised by these gangs only doubles their current fear and pain, and it only adds insult to injury to blame the innocent there given these drug gangs exist because a chief motive of them is to fuel American drug abusers. It's also far more of a pressing reason why IMO the US needs to resolve the issue of the border insecurity ASAP. After all, the gangs are often also involved in illegal immigrant 'coyote' trafficking and/or viciously prey upon immigrants heading north as they hitch rides on the freight trains up through Mexico, etc.

That these gangs would target US personnel given US support for cracking down on them has been something I've long expected, and I expected that it will get worse. That includes gang attacks inside the US given many gangs, like MS-13 and others, are already growing in power and setting up operations here with the help of open border. The US should continue to work with Mexico and other nations to eradicate these gangs as best as possible.

The US would also be much better off working on its own side of the border against gangs. That also includes more severe criminal penalties and approaches to gang membership. IMO, they are all criminal conspiracies and racketeering organisations. I'd go as far as arresting and incarcerating anyone with gang membership. I'd pass laws placing a prima facie presumption of gang tattoos of constituting membership in a criminal organisation and/or criminal solicitation, meaning a judge or jury deciding guilt can, if convinced beyond a reasonable doubt from the facts and circumstances presented to them, consider that sufficient evidence alone of gang membership. IMO, the US is way too lax on both criminalisation and enforcement when it comes to gang membership. I'd beef up crime codes and penalties for anyone working with gangs, etc. On the drug usage side, obviously methods should be pursued to address that as effectively as possible.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010
Donkey_Left's Avatar
President
Sinner

 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Tierra Querida
Posts: 20,152

United_States     Colombia

re: Justification for war? -Mexico-

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomBlaze View Post
Mexico drug hitmen target U.S. consulate staff - Focus on Mexico- msnbc.com

Read the above article. These people were assassinated. Is this considered an act of war? If not would it still be justification to send the military to Mexico to go on a search and destroy mission against these cartels? I am torn on this, but this is serious. I lean towards a search and destroy. I mean it's Mexico. My old high school football team could take over that country. We should not have to allow that to happen.

On the other hand, action like that would open a a serious can of worms that would eventually create another guerrilla war that could last for decades so maybe we should just erect a 20ft steel-reinforced 6ft thick wall on the border with mounted-remote machine gun turrets and kill anything that tries to cross the border?

I don't know. I am mad about this. But really, rationally speaking, how should we deal with this?
As these cartels are not governments, they cannot commit acts of war.
__________________
First they came for the mimes, and I did not speak out, because I was a mime.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010
Sunshine's Avatar
Vice President
So many years in one yesterday~

 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 8,394

United_States     Kentucky

re: Justification for war? -Mexico-

Quote:
Originally Posted by O'Sullivan Bere View Post
You're pretty much on it.

These drug gangs terrorise the Mexicans far more than they do inside the US. It's been a vicious bloodbath there for quite awhile. Blaming the Mexicans who are victimised by these gangs only doubles their current fear and pain, and it only adds insult to injury to blame the innocent there given these drug gangs exist because a chief motive of them is to fuel American drug abusers. It's also far more of a pressing reason why IMO the US needs to resolve the issue of the border insecurity ASAP. After all, the gangs are often also involved in illegal immigrant 'coyote' trafficking and/or viciously prey upon immigrants heading north as they hitch rides on the freight trains up through Mexico, etc.

That these gangs would target US personnel given US support for cracking down on them has been something I've long expected, and I expected that it will get worse. That includes gang attacks inside the US given many gangs, like MS-13 and others, are already growing in power and setting up operations here with the help of open border. The US should continue to work with Mexico and other nations to eradicate these gangs as best as possible.

The US would also be much better off working on its own side of the border against gangs. That also includes more severe criminal penalties and approaches to gang membership. IMO, they are all criminal conspiracies and racketeering organisations. I'd go as far as arresting and incarcerating anyone with gang membership. I'd pass laws placing a prima facie presumption of gang tattoos of constituting membership in a criminal organisation and/or criminal solicitation, meaning a judge or jury deciding guilt can, if convinced beyond a reasonable doubt from the facts and circumstances presented to them, consider that sufficient evidence alone of gang membership. IMO, the US is way too lax on both criminalisation and enforcement when it comes to gang membership. I'd beef up crime codes and penalties for anyone working with gangs, etc. On the drug usage side, obviously methods should be pursued to address that as effectively as possible.
Incarceration would not be adequate. Most gang members just get stronger in prison. There would need to be a different kind of incarceration and I'm just not feeling creative enough tonight to suggest one. But what we have doesn't work. It just makes them stronger. Not only does it make them stronger it gives them nationwide contacts. They might know only their fellow street thugs in the open, but get them in prison and they are a national network. They know that too.
__________________
Whatever hits the fan will not be evenly distributed.


Karma Bites!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010
WFCY's Avatar
el revolucionario

 
Member Since: Jun 2003
Location: .
Posts: 14,374

   
re: Justification for war? -Mexico-

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donkey_Left View Post
As these cartels are not governments, they cannot commit acts of war.
neither is Al Qaeda, oh wait, I see what u did there...
__________________
"Déjeme decirle, a riesgo de parecer ridículo, que el revolucionario verdadero está guiado por grandes sentimientos de amor. Es imposible pensar en un revolucionario auténtico sin esta cualidad."

Ernesto 'Che' Guevara.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010
U.S. House Representative

 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 665

   
re: Justification for war? -Mexico-

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donkey_Left View Post
As these cartels are not governments, they cannot commit acts of war.
True, but Al Qaeda is not a government yet we still invaded Afghanistan and literally declared war on them. Yes the Taliban were giving them refuge and I definitely agree with going in but the philosophical question is how are the Mexican cartels any different?

Lets face it they would not be so powerful if they did not have friends in the Mexican government and it is also becoming clear that they lack the ability to definitively win this clash with the cartels. How many innocent Americans must die before we act?

In hindsight, I think I would have supported invading Mexico well before Iraq (now that we know there were never any WMDs).

I know there is really no good answer and the last thing we need is another war we cannot afford (though some warmongers may disagree as war is profitable) but I can only see this getting worse as time goes on.

Couldn't we just send in Delta Force in small teams of real life Rambos to kill these drug lords in their homes and hang their heads on stakes all over the country. We certainly have highly trained killing machines and serious technology that can easily put these disorganized, barely educated hooligans to pasture without killing a single civilian. In Swat Valley not so much so due to the terrain and the lack of cover but in Mexico they could move in liek ninjas inthe middle of the night and kill these guys while they sleep out on the drug plantations and at the homes of these drug lords.

I do not advocate capturing them. I am saying find them and kill them where they stand regardless of whether or not they surrender. Black Ops stuff. I was in the military so I know this is very much in the realm of possibility.
__________________
There is no god. Get over it already.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010
Commodore's Avatar
Secretary of State
Nationalist

 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 4,807

New_York     Earth

re: Justification for war? -Mexico-

Unlike Al-quida in Afghanistan, the Mexican government is fighting the cartels.

We have to deny the cartels a market. And since the junkies and dealers north of the border are known to be uncooperative, the only place to stop the trade is t the border.
__________________
January 21, 2013: The End of an ERROR.

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."
"The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself."
---Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online