Visit the Archives for U.S. Politics Online -- U.S. Politics Online . net














So you think it's ridicules, eh? Anyway, I explained the context in an earlier post. READING FOR COMPREHENSION..
Also, that's the first time I've heard that one about purposely underfunding the regulatory agencies so that "these loans could be passed as secure loans." That doesn't even make sense.
"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." - Margaret Thatcher




























If a plan exists to spend X and cover it with sources of revenue A, B, and C, and then you give up revenue source A, then giving up revenue source A will result in a deficit.
By contrast, if a plan exists to spend X and cover it with sources of revenue A, B, and C, and then you decide to spend 1.2X, then the increased spending will result in a deficit.







Taxes are OUR money not the governments.....Why is it that you seem to have a problem with that? You cant lose revenue you never had to begin with. Hell lowering taxes actually increases revenue and couple that with spending cut means fast recovery. Now that will mean certain teachers will have to actually PAY for part of their benefits like the rest of us do.
Moderates are not republicans
Bookmarks