[QUOTE=Imperator;1124804]Mainstream Ave.

__________________

We invaded several years ago.

Last I heard was we are trying to keep the peace in Iraq.

Where are you getting your news from these days?


So nobody blew up any Mosques until after the Civil War started?

Boy are you in the dark.

__________________
It's hard to stay mad at someone who makes you laugh - Jay Leno

You heard from the gummint who told you wrong.

Google News
Guardian Unlimited home | Guardian Unlimited
Breaking News | Latest News | Current News - FOXNews.com
Al Jazeera English - Front Page
The Christian Science Monitor | csmonitor.com
The New York Times - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia
Harper's Magazine
Economist.com
TheAtlantic.com :: Home
Salon.com - Breaking news, opinion, politics, entertainment, sports and culture.
National Review Online
.
.
.

Mosque bombing were rare when Saddam was in power, i. e. the time right before the civil war (which started after Saddam was ousted)

Cool, the GOP insignia!

__________________

Must make the secret handshake a real challenge.

What block are you on? I have a cousin that lives on that street.

__________________
“Nations have no permanent friends or allies, they only have permanent interests.” - Lord Palmerston

I don't know what a gummint is.



I heard most of my news from the guys that have been over there.

The first Mosque bombings preceeded the media push and the Democrat declaration that there was a civil war.



Saddam must have been such a nice guy. The way he 'took care' of his people.......


Yahoo! Image Search Results for saddam mass grave
Yahoo! Image Detail for www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2006-06/06/xin_31060306091127701702.jpg





I can't see why we shouldn't try to bring his kind of leadership back to Iraq.........because nothing bad happened during Saddams rule at all.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2...1127701702.jpg




And this is the Democrat insignias:

__________________
It's hard to stay mad at someone who makes you laugh - Jay Leno

It's what you call the folks running the US when babybush and/or his cowpoke brethren are in charge.

That's a big reason why so many Iraqis keep fighting, because US troops (the invaders) are still over there.

Exactly, mass mosque bombing started around the time of this. . .

http://thinkprogress.org/wp-images/u...complished.jpg

He sure killed more terrorists and less innocent civilians than the US does per year after it invaded.

It's too late. The US already !@#$%^ed up Iraq. The days of Saddam and the Islamic terrorists being kept down in Iraq are a distant memory.

And this is the Democrat insignias:

Not surprising, Mother Nature has always had it in for about bush's sad environment record. . .

__________________

Not one of your comments made any sense at all.

I think you're just as hater, not a debater.

Someone this hopeless needs to be put on ignore.

__________________
It's hard to stay mad at someone who makes you laugh - Jay Leno

Pelosi's use of the word like is a smear.

(Wanted to be on topic when I bumped a thread more rational than the four or five Whitey threads that are the most popular tonight...not good for guests to see that.)

Well at least Pelosi lives in the real world where everyone is sick and tired of this administration and really fed up with the War. It's just too bad she doesn't have the balls to cut the funding and bring the troops home immediately.

I'm so sick of both parties. Why is it that Ron Paul is the only American candidate for president who's right about foreign policy and right about immigration? Over 70% of the country agrees with the guy on the two biggest issues while the rest of everybody is looking at warmongers or typical candidates who bend and shift their positions and have pre-packaged answers to everything.

It's all game show infotainment now in politics. Pelosi said this. Reid said that. Bush said this. Ahnuld chimed in. Romney says this but really stands for that. Everyone's uttering words and no one is doing anything. No progress now in America for 7 years on mostly everything.

Technology, innovation, science, everything is there for us to work on the climate crisis; the public wants out of the wars, wants the borders secure, wants progress on global warming, wants a country that is less dependent on oil. But we keep getting the same shit, time and again.

For a lot of reasons, but mostly because of the big two or three issues, Ron Paul is clearly the only choice anyone should be making. No more corporate welfare state or illegal wars, a return to haebeus corpus, no more secret torture prisons.

I say the gov't likes Homeland Security and the Patriot Act, and that's why every candidate is mum on those two things. Both sides want big gov't, want to control our lives and waste our hard earned money. It really doesn't have to be that way this time. You can choose differently this time. You really can.

"Like" war? That's a tough one.

I mean, hell, I absolutely love watching cable TV shows on past wars - especially when formerly classified/hidden stuff is revealed. The equipment, the tactics, the personalities, the innovation, the occasional heart-warming stories, the brotherhood, even the blunders.

The actual practice of "war" with all the cost? Um, no. Who could be a fan of that other than, maybe, the odd military professional in search of something to do (try and tell me Patton didn't enjoy war...geesh)? Necessary evil. Violence does solve some things.

The result of war? Now that's something of which to be a fan! American freedom? I like that. Kicking the Brits off our soil (again)? Worth the cost of a White House. Freed slaves and the U.S. staying together? Excellent. Hitler? No-brainer. Throwing back communism? Righteous! USSR gone? w00h00! A stable democracy in the Middle East that is no longer interested in developing weapons of mass destruction and supporting terror in a number of ways? Exciting! Assuming certain leftist jackasses allow the mission come to a victorious conclusion, of course.

Let's not forget the innumerable innovations and inventions that were the direct result of armed conflict. Nearly every technology/comfort we enjoy today has its roots in war.

I don't even mind cheap gas and bananas, free and open waterways, and having most of the rest of the free world completely indebted to us for their freedom.

There is a reason that our country has been in continual operation under the same government for longer than any European nation of which I can think...and it ain't mostly because of our 1337 negotiation skilz.

__________________

"Compassionate Conservatism"?!?! That is a stupid phrase. Conservatism is inherently compassionate. It is liberalism that is cruel for the sake of maintaining a constituency.

Is it that much of a stretch to say that Bush liked a result of this war (his re-election) and was working to start it? But you are right. Violence does solve some things. In this case, however, it solved not much more than one thing (Bush's re-election), while creating a shit load of nothing but problems.What exactly does this war in particular have to do with that? That is what the OP mentioned, by the way.

I'd say it would be more accurate to say that Bush likes one result of the war, and doesn't mind the other results, like murder.

same could be said of roosevelt..so what?

__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."

So they were both pieces of shit. That's "so what." I don't understand why you fell back on a colossal turd like FDR, if that's the guy you mean.

yes it was....just checking......as long as we realize, 9/10's of our political leadership are turds and cross each aisle I am cool with that.

__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."