Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Political Arenas > Capitol Hill

Capitol Hill A forum to discuss Congress, lawmaking and the legislative branch in general

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2008
daddio's Avatar
daddio daddio is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 2,376

United_States     Virginia

Re: Nancy Pelosi going to save the planet single handedly

Quote:
Originally Posted by josh_logic View Post
I'm sorry, but trying to preserve one of the last truly untouched sections of the planet instead of squeezing every last drop of oil out of the ground does not make someone an environmental whacko.

Alaska is not going to make or break anyone's oil consumption tendencies. Once we've destroyed ANWR like we have every other quadrant of this planet there is no going back. I will never understand why the "conservative" side of politics turns a blind eye towards the environment and the earth. We owe everything we have to a delicate balance of renewal and sustainment and all anyone seems to care about these days is getting what they want *right now*, at any expense, and with no consideration to the welfare of the planet.

Unforunately the planet itself has no voice, though even if it did I'm sure we'd be ignoring that too.

Josh


doesn't seem to bother the critters

__________________
Hope is the opposite of audacity. It's passive, an excuse for inaction.

Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

“What's the difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama?”

“One is a well turned-out, good-looking, and let's be honest, pretty sexy piece of eye-candy.

“The other kills her own food.”
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2008
theawesomeone5's Avatar
theawesomeone5 theawesomeone5 is offline
Citizen
Civil Disobedience

 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 21

United_States    
Re: Nancy Pelosi going to save the planet single handedly

"We don't even know what they are yet. You can hardly consider oil obsolete." -Josh Logic


So, wind, solar, and hydrogen are just myths right? How about instead of trying to stick with oil, we spend money researching these alternate sources. Add more hydrogen fueled buses and cars. Use wind power to provide energy for homes and other things like that.

Drilling in ANWR will have little effect. First of all, it would be quite a while until we will be able to utilize the fossil fuels there. Secondly, the amount of fuel there, would not be able to provide the nation for very long.

Our main weakness right now, is that we are dependent upon the people who hate us for our energy needs.
If we were to invest in researching for wind, solar, hydrogen, etc then we would actually be making some progress.

Of course, oil companies and their lobboyists will stop at no means to prevent this.

When it all comes down to it, lobbying is what comes to the root of most of our problems.
__________________
"A man flattened by an opponent can get up again. A man flattened by conformity stays down for good."
-Thomas J. Watson
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2008
daddio's Avatar
daddio daddio is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 2,376

United_States     Virginia

Re: Nancy Pelosi going to save the planet single handedly

Quote:
Originally Posted by theawesomeone5 View Post
"We don't even know what they are yet. You can hardly consider oil obsolete." -Josh Logic


So, wind, solar, and hydrogen are just myths right? How about instead of trying to stick with oil, we spend money researching these alternate sources. Add more hydrogen fueled buses and cars. Use wind power to provide energy for homes and other things like that.

Drilling in ANWR will have little effect. First of all, it would be quite a while until we will be able to utilize the fossil fuels there. Secondly, the amount of fuel there, would not be able to provide the nation for very long.

Our main weakness right now, is that we are dependent upon the people who hate us for our energy needs.
If we were to invest in researching for wind, solar, hydrogen, etc then we would actually be making some progress.

Of course, oil companies and their lobboyists will stop at no means to prevent this.

When it all comes down to it, lobbying is what comes to the root of most of our problems.



hydrogen would be great if we had a cheap way to produce it, we don't nor do we have any ideas on how to try. Nuclear power would make the electricity relatively efficiently but thats being blocked at all turns as well.

wind doesn't work nationwide, actually its only effective in a relatively few places but I'd be for pursuing it but its already being done.

solar will never be all that useful without an far better means of tapping it.

saw a story about using ocean currents and perhaps tides, thats maybe worth looking into.

but we're going to be using oil and natural gas for a while, it would be better to use our own than somebody else's.
__________________
Hope is the opposite of audacity. It's passive, an excuse for inaction.

Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

“What's the difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama?”

“One is a well turned-out, good-looking, and let's be honest, pretty sexy piece of eye-candy.

“The other kills her own food.”
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2008
AkDiesel's Avatar
AkDiesel AkDiesel is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: USA-Alaska
Posts: 2,282

United_States     Alaska

Re: Nancy Pelosi going to save the planet single handedly

Research,, yes research and more research and when that round is done go and do some more research and then some more all funded by the Feds ... sounds really great.

Research = More Gov Funding.

The information is there, just do it.
simple......
__________________
Fear the Government
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2008
SomeMarine SomeMarine is online now
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 892

   
Re: Nancy Pelosi going to save the planet single handedly

Quote:
Originally Posted by josh_logic View Post
Someone needs to draw the line somewhere or we will continue to ravage the earth as we see fit based on the short term demands of the current population.


Josh

You do realize EVERY human, plant, ptotzoa, and animal EVER born, has done exactly this? You change your environment every time you breathe. Are you going to off yourself to live up to your self righteous ideals? Hell, even doing that will have a major impact on the environment, and upset the "natural" order of things.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2008
AkDiesel's Avatar
AkDiesel AkDiesel is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: USA-Alaska
Posts: 2,282

United_States     Alaska

Re: Nancy Pelosi going to save the planet single handedly

Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeMarine View Post
You do realize EVERY human, plant, ptotzoa, and animal EVER born, has done exactly this? You change your environment every time you breathe. Are you going to off yourself to live up to your self righteous ideals? Hell, even doing that will have a major impact on the environment, and upset the "natural" order of things.
I think that you finally have started to see the light and the trueth of the Environmental movment as it is known today.......REMOVE THE HUMAN RACE FROM THE PLANET, is the only way to save the planet.
__________________
Fear the Government
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2008
Troutscout's Avatar
Troutscout Troutscout is offline
Concerned Citizen

 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: The Great Northwet
Posts: 46

   
Re: Nancy Pelosi going to save the planet single handedly

Quote:
Originally Posted by BJA62 View Post
2000 acres of 19+ million acres is hardly "destroying" it, even if the 2000 acres were going to be destroyed in the process, which it ain't.

The very act of authorizing the drilling in ANWR will have an immediate affect on oil prices. Long before we ever put a piece of equipment on the ground we will reap the benefits of finally having the balls to take care of the people of this country 1st over a snail, or a caribou, or a rare type of grass.
On the 2nd portion of your post, you're taking for granted that 1.) We all have bought into the idea the earth is warming 2.) That we are the cause of it, if it's happening at all. Oil is not obsolete yet, my freind. There has to be a replacement for something for it to become obsolete. Just because Algore has said we need to find alternative energy sources doesn't mean they are here and ready to use. We don't even know what they are yet. You can hardly consider oil obsolete.

Done. With your previous statement, you are either ignorant of the facts, or, you intentionally meant to twist the facts to make your case. Then, you get all outraged when someone calls you on it. Yeah. That sounds about right.
So, what about the other 60 million acres of leases Big Oil holds in the lower 48 and aren't drilling on. What's up with that? They dry or something?

Btw, in the last quarter Exxon reported earnings of $1350.

Per second.

And one wonders why they want ANWR?

Give it rest will ya.'
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2008
AkDiesel's Avatar
AkDiesel AkDiesel is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: USA-Alaska
Posts: 2,282

United_States     Alaska

Re: Nancy Pelosi going to save the planet single handedly

What does Pelosi care, with the leader of the House pay of 220,000 per year and all the rest of the benefits of the office she is not paying for energy...
Despite the pressure, Pelosi stays firm: No vote on offshore oil drilling

It is nice to know that there is some one that is looking out for me and my lack of schooling , making sure that I do not make the mistakes that I might other wise make with out her and others like her.
__________________
Fear the Government
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2008
usmc7011's Avatar
usmc7011 usmc7011 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
god

 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: florida
Posts: 1,590

United_States     United_States

Re: Nancy Pelosi going to save the planet single handedly

Quote:
Originally Posted by josh_logic View Post
That sounds about right. Accuse the other side of ignorance instead of actually discussing the issue at hand. Perhaps you'd care to enlighten me on the topic factually?
Not my job to educate you. Your going to have to do your own footwork and research the facts.
__________________
"Chaplain Charlie will tell you about how the free world will conquer Communism with the aid of God and a few marines! God has a hard-on for marines because we kill everything we see! He plays His games, we play ours! To show our appreciation for so much power, we keep heaven packed with fresh souls! God was here before the Marine Corps! So you can give your heart to Jesus, but your ass belongs to the Corps! Do you ladies understand?"
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2008
usmc7011's Avatar
usmc7011 usmc7011 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
god

 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: florida
Posts: 1,590

United_States     United_States

Re: Nancy Pelosi going to save the planet single handedly

Quote:
but there has to be a line at which we say our grandchildren should be able to visit a portion of the country that hasn't been developed
And why do you think our grandchildren would want to visit this?
__________________
"Chaplain Charlie will tell you about how the free world will conquer Communism with the aid of God and a few marines! God has a hard-on for marines because we kill everything we see! He plays His games, we play ours! To show our appreciation for so much power, we keep heaven packed with fresh souls! God was here before the Marine Corps! So you can give your heart to Jesus, but your ass belongs to the Corps! Do you ladies understand?"
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2008
BJA62's Avatar
BJA62 BJA62 is offline
County Council Member
Purveyor of Common Sense

 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 283

United_States    
Re: Nancy Pelosi going to save the planet single handedly

Quote:
Originally Posted by theawesomeone5 View Post
"We don't even know what they are yet. You can hardly consider oil obsolete." -Josh Logic


So, wind, solar, and hydrogen are just myths right? How about instead of trying to stick with oil, we spend money researching these alternate sources. Add more hydrogen fueled buses and cars. Use wind power to provide energy for homes and other things like that.

Drilling in ANWR will have little effect. First of all, it would be quite a while until we will be able to utilize the fossil fuels there. Secondly, the amount of fuel there, would not be able to provide the nation for very long.

Our main weakness right now, is that we are dependent upon the people who hate us for our energy needs.
If we were to invest in researching for wind, solar, hydrogen, etc then we would actually be making some progress.

Of course, oil companies and their lobboyists will stop at no means to prevent this.

When it all comes down to it, lobbying is what comes to the root of most of our problems.
They are not myth. But, they can't come close to providing the energy we need. I'm not saying we shouldn't continue to use these sources and attempt to find ways to make them more practical. I'm not saying we shouldn't be looking for yet unknown sources. What I'm saying is our economy relies on fossil fuel now and will for quite some time. Even if we were to find some way to make one of the sources you mentioned (wind, solar) for production of electricity we would still require fossil fuel for transportation and production of goods. Right now, those alternative sources work only as a supplement to sources fueled by fossil fuel. Hydrogen is promising, but, as yet still way too expensive and the technology still does not exist to make it a feasible alternative. It will happen. But, I don't believe these will be the sources. But, we need relief now. Our entire economy depends on it.

The estimates for the reserves in ANWR are a minimum of 30 years supply for our needs. OCS reserves are as promising. Shale is still more. Although, it is unlikely the reserves would not go to world market. But, that would have a serious effect on supply, thus, reducing the price. Because the price is driven by speculation, it would have an immediate effect. The prices are going to drop when the announcement is made we are going to drill. Not wait until the product actually hits the market. Utilizing these reserves will give us time to develop new technology and build the infra structure needed.

I work as a natural gas technician. I install heating systems, etc. I've worked with systems that incorporate solar and geothermal technology. They work, but, still rely on fuel energy. We just don't have the technology to replace fossil fuel... yet.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2008
historybuff's Avatar
historybuff historybuff is offline
Governor

 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 548

   
Re: Nancy Pelosi going to save the planet single handedly

[quote=theawesomeone5;1260942
Use wind power to provide energy for homes and other things like that.

[/QUOTE]

There is no effective and efficient way of storing wind energy yet. It's not yet a viable option.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2008
AkDiesel's Avatar
AkDiesel AkDiesel is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: USA-Alaska
Posts: 2,282

United_States     Alaska

Re: Nancy Pelosi going to save the planet single handedly

And Pelosi closed the house with out a vote on off shore drilling, now while off shore drilling may or may not be good, to close the house with out a vote is just wrong... but you will not hear about it in the news.
__________________
Fear the Government
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2008
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is online now
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,625

United_States    
Re: Nancy Pelosi going to save the planet single handedly

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troutscout View Post
So, what about the other 60 million acres of leases Big Oil holds in the lower 48 and aren't drilling on. What's up with that? They dry or something?

Btw, in the last quarter Exxon reported earnings of $1350.

Per second.

And one wonders why they want ANWR?

Give it rest will ya.'
we have had a lengthy discussion here on leased land they are not drilling , you can find it by using the search feature.


item: the caribou herds in the vicinity of Prudhomme have grown in size, in fact they calve next to the relative warmth of the pipelines etc.

item: gas is selling like, well gas, supply demand and humonguous quantities are being sold, if they sold more at lower prices it would balance out.

item: dollar inflation, I heard it was $1500.00 a minute, and so what?

item: they make an approx. profit of 7-9% per gallon of gas, hardly a soaking, don't lt the size of the dollar amounts fol you, its all relative.
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2008
AkDiesel's Avatar
AkDiesel AkDiesel is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: USA-Alaska
Posts: 2,282

United_States     Alaska

Re: Nancy Pelosi going to save the planet single handedly

And so it conitunes, the news black out even here. NO one is talking about the fact that Pelosi closed the house and did not have a vote up or down on the drilling, truely she does not give a frak about what we have to deal with each and every day, nore does she wish for the DNC to be on record before the Election on how they stand on this.
Take back the Government.
write this lady and get the vote yes or no.
__________________
Fear the Government
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online