Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Political Arenas > Capitol Hill

Capitol Hill A forum to discuss Congress, lawmaking and the legislative branch in general

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2008
Danny's Avatar
Danny Danny is offline
Rahmbo will get it done

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 3,274

Canada     United_States

Hillary as Senate majority leader?

Do you think Clinton might accept a job as Senate majority leader? I can't stand the spineless and depressing Harry Reid and the Dems would do well to put a new face on congress in 09. What do you think?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2008
daddio's Avatar
daddio daddio is online now
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 2,415

United_States     Virginia

Re: Hillary as Senate majority leader?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny View Post
Do you think Clinton might accept a job as Senate majority leader? I can't stand the spineless and depressing Harry Reid and the Dems would do well to put a new face on congress in 09. What do you think?



It would be difficult to do worse than Harry Reid.
__________________
Hope is the opposite of audacity. It's passive, an excuse for inaction.

Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

“What's the difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama?”

“One is a well turned-out, good-looking, and let's be honest, pretty sexy piece of eye-candy.

“The other kills her own food.”
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2008
AjaxPress's Avatar
AjaxPress AjaxPress is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 4,485

United_States     Ethiopia

Re: Hillary as Senate majority leader?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny View Post
Do you think Clinton might accept a job as Senate majority leader? I can't stand the spineless and depressing Harry Reid and the Dems would do well to put a new face on congress in 09. What do you think?
I don't see how Hillary would be much different though. She's just as unprincipled as Reid.
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2008
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,638

United_States    
Re: Hillary as Senate majority leader?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AjaxPress View Post
I don't see how Hillary would be much different though. She's just as unprincipled as Reid.
No but shes a great deal more centrist/opportunist, just as bill was, shes also wheeler dealer, oh she’ll try the usual shit, but at the end of the day shes 5 times smarter than Reid and Pelosi put together imho, and will compromise while grinding out deals that make the gov. work. Add to that, I CAN see her being a greatd deal tougher, than the creme puff, obama, regards dealing with Iran et al. Identity politics has shot istself in its own foot. Even if Barry wins, you'll see.

Reid and Pelosi have been disasters, no I am not a dem and those who are may feel different, but I don’t see how, their record is as thin and corrupt as those they replaced with even less accomplishments legislatively, add to that that the huge congressional lead they had in the run up to this election , has almost evaporated, that takes work let me tell you.


I never thought I would say this, ever, but right now, despite my despising her on a personal level, IF she were the dem candidate, I would very very seriously consider voting for her. Go figure.

As to the OP, I can definitely see Pelosi getting canned after the election if Barry wins. That’s would be a great first step towards “change”……but I am not holding my breath.
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2008
Si modo's Avatar
Si modo Si modo is offline
In a Garden of Eden
Buckeye by birth; Boilermaker by choice

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 14,256
Blog Entries: 1

United_States    
Re: Hillary as Senate majority leader?

I don't know if HRC has enough time in grade to be leader; I'm thinking some others in that party might have their noses put out of joint. But anyone is better than Reid.
__________________
I am an American. That's the way most of us put it, just matter of factly. They are plain words, those four: you could write them on your thumbnail, or sweep them clear across this bright autumn sky. But remember too, that they are more than just words. They are a way of life. So whenever you speak them; speak them firmly, speak them proudly, speak them gratefully. I am an American. ...a tradition
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2008
California Girl's Avatar
California Girl California Girl is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
My bite is worst than my bark

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Where there is trouble, I am there!
Posts: 1,622

United_States     California

Re: Hillary as Senate majority leader?

I like Clinton. She's a kick ass chick. My kinda girl! Don't necessarily agree with her but she's a damned sight better than most of the DNC. If she was running against McCain, we'd have a serious contest. Hell, I might even have voted for her!
__________________
"On my signal, unleash hell."
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2008
chassisman's Avatar
chassisman chassisman is offline
Secretary of State
poof! you're gone (2)

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: bible belt
Posts: 8,292

United_States     Texas

Re: Hillary as Senate majority leader?

Quote:
Originally Posted by California Girl View Post
I like Clinton. She's a kick ass chick. My kinda girl! Don't necessarily agree with her but she's a damned sight better than most of the DNC. If she was running against McCain, we'd have a serious contest. Hell, I might even have voted for her!
If the DNC hadn't boned Michigan and Florida, you may have had that chance.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2008
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,735

United_States     Russian

Re: Hillary as Senate majority leader?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny View Post
Do you think Clinton might accept a job as Senate majority leader? I can't stand the spineless and depressing Harry Reid and the Dems would do well to put a new face on congress in 09. What do you think?
They should try putting a new (this time rational) set of policies on Congress rather than trying to trick people with "a new face."
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2008
Scribbler1's Avatar
Scribbler1 Scribbler1 is offline
Secretary of State
Skeptical Patriot

 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Delaware, USA, Earth
Posts: 5,308

United_States     Delaware

Re: Hillary as Senate majority leader?

Quote:
Originally Posted by chassisman View Post
If the DNC hadn't boned Michigan and Florida, you may have had that chance.
I was under the impression those states boned themselves by breaking the party rules. The DNC is a private organization. They are not legally bound to any kind of "fairness" other than what THEY see as fair.
__________________
Not a day goes by that I don't see something that reinforces my belief that people are idiots.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2008
Si modo's Avatar
Si modo Si modo is offline
In a Garden of Eden
Buckeye by birth; Boilermaker by choice

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 14,256
Blog Entries: 1

United_States    
Re: Hillary as Senate majority leader?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scribbler1 View Post
I was under the impression those states boned themselves by breaking the party rules. The DNC is a private organization. They are not legally bound to any kind of "fairness" other than what THEY see as fair.
Unfortunately, these private organizations have the power to disenfranchise voters, as they did. The current system allows for this power, but the fact that they used their power and DID disenfranchise so many voters is very uncool.
__________________
I am an American. That's the way most of us put it, just matter of factly. They are plain words, those four: you could write them on your thumbnail, or sweep them clear across this bright autumn sky. But remember too, that they are more than just words. They are a way of life. So whenever you speak them; speak them firmly, speak them proudly, speak them gratefully. I am an American. ...a tradition
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2008
wooyarn wooyarn is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Retired
Posts: 842

United_States    
Re: Hillary as Senate majority leader?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Si modo View Post
Unfortunately, these private organizations have the power to disenfranchise voters, as they did. The current system allows for this power, but the fact that they used their power and DID disenfranchise so many voters is very uncool.
You do know the Rep's did the same thing.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2008
Si modo's Avatar
Si modo Si modo is offline
In a Garden of Eden
Buckeye by birth; Boilermaker by choice

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 14,256
Blog Entries: 1

United_States    
Re: Hillary as Senate majority leader?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wooyarn View Post
You do know the Rep's did the same thing.
I know the GOP did something similar. It still does not make it cool what the either of the parties did.

But, if you insist on making my post partisan (as you've tried to do before, but failed miserably at doing so), I suppose we could hash out the differences.
__________________
I am an American. That's the way most of us put it, just matter of factly. They are plain words, those four: you could write them on your thumbnail, or sweep them clear across this bright autumn sky. But remember too, that they are more than just words. They are a way of life. So whenever you speak them; speak them firmly, speak them proudly, speak them gratefully. I am an American. ...a tradition
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2008
goober's Avatar
goober goober is offline
President

 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 10,333

   
Re: Hillary as Senate majority leader?

Hillary would rock as majority leader, and if Obama wins, she's a good bet to get it.
If Obama loses, and people feel she didn't try "hard enough" to get him elected it may be a tough sell.
__________________
“ The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state.”

Adam Smith , The Wealth of Nations 1776

"We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics"
FDR's second Inaugural Address
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2008
daddio's Avatar
daddio daddio is online now
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 2,415

United_States     Virginia

Re: Hillary as Senate majority leader?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Si modo View Post
Unfortunately, these private organizations have the power to disenfranchise voters, as they did. The current system allows for this power, but the fact that they used their power and DID disenfranchise so many voters is very uncool.


I'm not sure I'd say anyone was disenfranchised as primaries are nothing more than private party mechanisms that we the tax payers, for some reason, get to pay for. Unless its a real election, that term really should not apply.

That being said, the DNC screwed up with it as evidenced by their seating the delegates anyway.
__________________
Hope is the opposite of audacity. It's passive, an excuse for inaction.

Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

“What's the difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama?”

“One is a well turned-out, good-looking, and let's be honest, pretty sexy piece of eye-candy.

“The other kills her own food.”
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-23-2008
Traveler Traveler is offline
Dejected Republican
THE Ultimate Bush Supporter

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 14,523

United_States     Texas

Re: Hillary as Senate majority leader?

Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
Hillary would rock as majority leader, and if Obama wins, she's a good bet to get it.
If Obama loses, and people feel she didn't try "hard enough" to get him elected it may be a tough sell.
I agree that it would be a good thing, but for different reasons.

I heard back in about 05 or so that Reid told collegues that he wanted to step aside and would be "whipping up votes" rather than be the majority leader so clearly the Dems have learnt the lesson of having a majority leader being held hostage by his base from a Red state being a bad idea.

I guess you figured you were untouchable until Daschle got the boot, imagine us kicking out the incumbent majority leader twice in 6 years.... Also with the majority he'd have in the next session....

I think it was also the time the immigration bill was flying about through the Senate and his numbers were at like 19% so it made sense.

But more so thn that it all but cripples Hillarry's ability to run for the Presidency but most importantly stops Obama from nominating her to the SC, because there's no way she's going from first lady to Senator, to leader to SC/President. Pigs will fly before that happens. Though if Obama wins i guess that takes the Presidency option off the table for her altogether.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online