Where is the "NEITHER"????

There AINT no best one.

I FEEL GOOD....KNEW THAT i WOULD NOW....SO GOOD...SO GOOD, i GOT YOU...arghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!

A PERFECT RECIPIENT OR RECIPENTS, WOULD BE ALL THE WOUNDED TROOPS HOME FROM IRAQ-AFGHANISTAN!!!

What a useless poll...how many people get nominated for that thing? And wait a minute, someone picks out 2?

I think Gore is a better choice, he'd fit in perfectly with the rest of the anti-Americans like Carter who are usually there and there abouts. If he runs in 08 this will be huge materiel for his opponents to use agaist him should he win the award.

These are the only two I've heard about so far.
Then why did you vote for Rush?

And what is it about winning the Nobel Peace Prize that would be detrimental to a Presidential campaign?

Do you actually think that the Nobel Peace Prize is anti-American?

This will show you that both Gore's and Limbaughs nomination are pure spin. The publication of their names in this context is the only goal, as it also amounts to jeopardizing any real chance they might have had.

__________________
"Say not, 'When I have free time I shall study'; for you may perhaps never have any free time"
Hillel the Elder

Al Gore, Jimmy Carter, Rush Limbaugh, Kofi Annan, Yasser Arafat ... etc .. etc ..etc .. seems kind of meaningless to me when people like this get nominated; Regardless, you should have added a neither button ...

__________________
"I miss the days when they made toys that could kill a kid."
- Jerry Seinfeld

There definitely needs to be an other option:

I think Gore's odds of winning are about 1 in 10.
I think Rush's odds of winning are about 1 in a trillion.


.....so you're saying there's a chance!?

__________________

Congratulations President-Elect Obama

It appears NO ONE agrees the US Military wounded deserve the Prize for helping some in the World be FREE!!! Fuck Gore and Carter the Commie bastards!!!

I think I deserve it for not punching one of my irritating neighbors right in the face. Where's my nomination for being peaceful and understanding?

__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson

You should have a choice of "neither". That is my vote.

__________________
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

President George W. Bush, 8-5-2004

Carolina Politics Online

THIS IS REAL HOPE AND CHANGE!

Yea, ya mean like Smilin Bob who feels the need to lose his swimmin trunks and show his newly"Grown" business?

Well then, in that case I would have to vote for Rush Limbaugh. His ideas would result in free market societies throughout the world allowing the poorest countries to build wealth and a higher standard of living for their people. The better standard of living a country has, the less prone it is to aggression towards others and the larger the expansion of liberty among its people, thus promoting peace.

Al Gore's solution would be wealth redistribution, taking from the productive and giving to the unproductive, a system which in the short run would achieve higher living standards for the poor, but a system which cannot be maintained in the long run and would eventually collapse on itself like we saw with the former USSR and are seeing in many Socialist European countries today.

But, I do reiterate, my ideal choice would be neither.

__________________
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

President George W. Bush, 8-5-2004

Carolina Politics Online

THIS IS REAL HOPE AND CHANGE!

Foamy the squirrel. Ye, he's a cartoon, but:

He's more alive than Gore.
He's way smarter than Rush.

And his minions are faithful and will destroy you.

So I'm voting Foamy.

Matt

__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum