YouTube - Sharon Stone's cold blooded speech about China earthquake
Sharon Stone's cold blooded speech about China earthquake
I don't know why she said so, but I think only who are full of hate to Chinese
would say so!
I really don't know how to comment her!

__________________

That usually means someone is telling a tough truth.

Yes. That IS pretty egregious. I usually expect celebrity loudmouths to say extremely inappropriate things. She should keep quiet, but she probably won't.

It is not kharma. It is a horrible loss of innocent life with camera hounds taking advantage of those who have died.

The easiest thing to say when something bad happens to someone is that it is Karma. This the same as saying "Good.....I hope you die!!"

If you noticed Ms. Stone also said she was thinking aloud and that the she learned from the situation. She said at first she thought it was Karma, but then she later used the Tibetan example as a illustration on how to live.

Even though people think evil of you sometimes it's best when those who do evil to you are in need you must bite your lip and do what is right and help them any way you can. That is what she said and that is what I got from her statement.

__________________
It's hard to stay mad at someone who makes you laugh - Jay Leno

I don't know if I agree with her entirely about China, but in May 8th I posted about what happenned in Myanmar - God is Angry at Myanmar « That’s Right Nate on my bog. Now consider that Obama just gave that big speech in Iowa where Tornadoes have been hitting the state hard and you have to think.

__________________
Nate Peele
www.Thatsrightnate.com
"Finally a journalist is not scared to question the truth"--TJ Baker Holm

Who gives a crap what any Hollywood bozo says?
Get back in front of the camera and entertain us..

__________________

I have absolutely no idea what my generation did to improve our democracy. We dropped the ball. We entered a period of complacency and closed our eyes to the public corruption of our democracy.
Wynton Marsalis

Did you see Basic Instinct 2? This is about as entertaining as she gets now.

__________________
Nate Peele
www.Thatsrightnate.com
"Finally a journalist is not scared to question the truth"--TJ Baker Holm

What an ugly woman!

__________________

I really can't blame China at all for taking these moves and going for a boycott of Dior. The souls of the many you have lost and the pain you feel should not be trampled on by opportunists who use the dead and others' pain for a personal agenda.

It's insensitive, callous, inhumane.

I can't blame you and I can't discount your anger at all. It's a righteous anger.

to see comments on her:
莎朗.斯通彻底完蛋了，这æ*‡å¿—ç�€ç¾Žå›½æ —*脑人的胡言乱è¯*需è¦�有人监ç�£äº†ï¼� - 北秋之声

__________________

Well, that would have been more to the point.

Sharon Stone suggests China quake was "karma"

Seriously, why do these people insist on opening their yaps on shit that they clearly don't understand?

__________________


Noli arrogantium iniurias pati

Threads merged

__________________
“Nations have no permanent friends or allies, they only have permanent interests.” - Lord Palmerston

Crap. Sorry 'bout that.

__________________


Noli arrogantium iniurias pati

I wonder about your opinion related to the numerous deaths inflicted by the PRC in the course of their revolutions. It is understandable that someone might think that a group of deaths might be the sign of somekind of retribution for past acts of destruction. Humans, in general want to find some indication that sins are punished. The simple fact is that these deaths are natural and the only reason we get upset is that it happened in one location. The karma thing is crap because karma is crap.

Sutanek

__________________

When SHTF - A Modern Day Survival Forum
Soon To Be Vital Information: How to Live in Your Car

The PRC was not free from blood on their hands. In history, what group gaining significant power is? The American Revolution is not, the Japanese Empire is not, the Nazis are not.

Thing is, when others tell me that the USA deserved what happened to it on 9/11 (for whatever reason one can imagine), it's a callous, inhumane, and insensitive thing to say. The innocents who lost their lives that day and their surviving loved ones are not to be used for gain on any talking point.

The Chinese who lost their lives that day (and continue to lose their lives) and their surving loved ones are not to be dishonored for gain on a talking point.

In comparison, the gain on a talking point is seriously irrelevant compared to the honor of an innocent who lost their life and the grief of their remaining loved ones.

It's opportunism at its worst.

There are plenty of other examples and incidents on which to make gain on a talking point. I leave this one alone.