Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Culture & Media Issues
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Culture & Media Issues Media, Culture, Art

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2008
chassisman's Avatar
Secretary of State
Right Wing Extremist

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: bible belt
Posts: 11,192

United_States     Texas

Re: Land of the Free and the home of the lame

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocobot View Post
Your too lame to do anything about anything anyway Chassis, no matter what country youre in.
You telling me I'm lame is like me telling you that the best part of you ran down your momma's leg.............while both may be true, they are both personal attacks and off topic.
__________________

I needs government help to live.
I must be a liberal.

Last edited by chassisman; 12-22-2008 at 09:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2008
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Hohenwald
Posts: 2,187

United_States     Tennessee

Re: Land of the Free and the home of the lame

Quote:
Originally Posted by partofme View Post
I'm the opposite. The financial bailout was about saving the system itself while the auto bailout is about throwing money at a outdated sector that is dying and we are only dragging the death out rather than getting it going again.
I must include myself among those who think that you have missed the point entirely. The "financial system" that exists today actually produces no wealth--it simply redistributes the wealth created by classic capitalism. Capitalism requires money, to be sure, but it has been an effective system because it invests the money to manufacture, build, or create things. It is this process of manufacturing, building, and creating which actually produces wealth by adding value to raw materials.

The manufacturing sector is not "outdated" by any stretch of the imagination. It is manufacturing which created the wealth that contemporary money managers so cavalierly redistribute among themselves. It is manufacturing which created the wealth which raised so many Americans to unprecedented levels of human prosperity and made our nation the envy (and the magnet) of the world. It is the manufacturing sector, not the financial sector, which must be restored if we are to resume our place at the head of those nations which provide opportunity and prosperity to the masses. That was (and still is) the genius of Capitalism. Far from opposing a bailout of the auto manufacturers, I propose that it be extended to encourage growth across the entire manufacturing sector. What we REALLY need, in effect, is a "Marshall Plan" for American industry.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2008
jpsartre12's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: On the Right of most issues
Posts: 5,795

United_States     Michigan

Re: Land of the Free and the home of the lame

Quote:
Originally Posted by partofme View Post
I'm the opposite. The financial bailout was about saving the system itself while the auto bailout is about throwing money at a outdated sector that is dying and we are only dragging the death out rather than getting it going again.
I'm not surprised about your uninformed statement about the Big Three, but I am surprised that you drank the bank bailout Kool-Aid without questioning its safeguard of YOUR $700Billion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chassisman View Post
I was against both. On the bolded part, funny, I said the same thing to my wife this Am as we watched the news.

Now we have Obama's economic "team" devising a trickle UP economics scheme which does absolutely nothing for the small businesses that employ 80% of working (or now unemployed but would like to work) Americans.
I'm against giving a blank check with MY name on it to ANYBODY. The US auto industry has been restructuring for years. With the creation of VEBA, they finally had a solution to their out of sync legacy costs that would let them compete with their foreign competitors on a level playing field. Unfortunately, the perfect storm hit before those changes could be realized. The gas crisis, combined with tight credit cut sales of ALL automobiles severely. Instead of selling 16million vehicles in 2008, the total will be more like 11.5Million.
Contrast that with what happened in the financial industry. Mortgage brokers made bad loans to unqualified people, collected big origination fees up front, bundled the mortgages into large packages and sold them to large investment funds that didn't even know the source or risks associated with their purchases.
So, I ask you. Given the two scenarios above, which do you believe is more deserving of our help?
__________________
843rd Bomb Wing - Strategic Air Command
"Peace is our Profession"

"Human law must rest its authority ultimately upon the authority of that law which is Divine. . . . Far from being rivals or enemies, religion and law are twin sisters, friends, and mutual assistants.
" - James Wilson, U. S. Supreme Court Justice and Signer of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2008
chassisman's Avatar
Secretary of State
Right Wing Extremist

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: bible belt
Posts: 11,192

United_States     Texas

Re: Land of the Free and the home of the lame

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHighForester View Post
I must include myself among those who think that you have missed the point entirely. The "financial system" that exists today actually produces no wealth--it simply redistributes the wealth created by classic capitalism. Capitalism requires money, to be sure, but it has been an effective system because it invests the money to manufacture, build, or create things. It is this process of manufacturing, building, and creating which actually produces wealth by adding value to raw materials.

The manufacturing sector is not "outdated" by any stretch of the imagination. It is manufacturing which created the wealth that contemporary money managers so cavalierly redistribute among themselves. It is manufacturing which created the wealth which raised so many Americans to unprecedented levels of human prosperity and made our nation the envy (and the magnet) of the world. It is the manufacturing sector, not the financial sector, which must be restored if we are to resume our place at the head of those nations which provide opportunity and prosperity to the masses. That was (and still is) the genius of Capitalism. Far from opposing a bailout of the auto manufacturers, I propose that it be extended to encourage growth across the entire manufacturing sector. What we REALLY need, in effect, is a "Marshall Plan" for American industry.
Trouble is THF, I can't see how Amwrican manufacturers can compete in our "world economy". We have passed the baton long ago.
__________________

I needs government help to live.
I must be a liberal.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2008
chassisman's Avatar
Secretary of State
Right Wing Extremist

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: bible belt
Posts: 11,192

United_States     Texas

Re: Land of the Free and the home of the lame

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpsartre12 View Post
I'm not surprised about your uninformed statement about the Big Three, but I am surprised that you drank the bank bailout Kool-Aid without questioning its safeguard of YOUR $700Billion.



I'm against giving a blank check with MY name on it to ANYBODY. The US auto industry has been restructuring for years. With the creation of VEBA, they finally had a solution to their out of sync legacy costs that would let them compete with their foreign competitors on a level playing field. Unfortunately, the perfect storm hit before those changes could be realized. The gas crisis, combined with tight credit cut sales of ALL automobiles severely. Instead of selling 16million vehicles in 2008, the total will be more like 11.5Million.
Contrast that with what happened in the financial industry. Mortgage brokers made bad loans to unqualified people, collected big origination fees up front, bundled the mortgages into large packages and sold them to large investment funds that didn't even know the source or risks associated with their purchases.
So, I ask you. Given the two scenarios above, which do you believe is more deserving of our help?
The banks, but not in the fashion that it was handled. They have the money, but it hasn't led to restoration of safe (safer?) lending.
__________________

I needs government help to live.
I must be a liberal.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2008
jpsartre12's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: On the Right of most issues
Posts: 5,795

United_States     Michigan

Re: Land of the Free and the home of the lame

Quote:
Originally Posted by chassisman View Post
You telling me I'm lame is like me telling you that the best part of you ran down your momma's leg.............while both may be true, they are both personal attacks and off topic.
Since I hadn't been posting here in quite a while, I thought that the rules against personal attacks must have been loosened. after the above exchange. Was my assumption in err?
__________________
843rd Bomb Wing - Strategic Air Command
"Peace is our Profession"

"Human law must rest its authority ultimately upon the authority of that law which is Divine. . . . Far from being rivals or enemies, religion and law are twin sisters, friends, and mutual assistants.
" - James Wilson, U. S. Supreme Court Justice and Signer of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2008
partofme's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 15,986

Earth     United_States

Re: Land of the Free and the home of the lame

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpsartre12 View Post
I'm not surprised about your uninformed statement about the Big Three, but I am surprised that you drank the bank bailout Kool-Aid without questioning its safeguard of YOUR $700Billion.
I'm not saying I love the bailout but I do think doing nothing would have been a disaster. So go ahead and sell me on how awesome the big three are. I would love to hear it.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2008
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Hohenwald
Posts: 2,187

United_States     Tennessee

Re: Land of the Free and the home of the lame

Quote:
Originally Posted by chassisman View Post
Trouble is THF, I can't see how Amwrican manufacturers can compete in our "world economy". We have passed the baton long ago.
Then you must not be aware that the United States is STILL the largest manufacturing nation in that "world economy." We not only can compete effectively and successfully--we are doing it in hundreds of products right now. It is well known, for example, that Toyota, Honda, Nissan,, Mecedes-Benz, and BMW have recently built and are profitably operating automobile manufacturing plants in the United States. How can you then argue that the auto industry in this country is dead? We continue to be the leading producer of components in many heavy manufacturing endeavors--Caterpillar, for example, has no peer in the production of heavy machinery anywhere in the world, Boeing (which has been woefully mismanaged of late) continues to be the giant among aircraft manufacturers, while Lockheed, McDonnell-Douglas, General Dynamics, and GE also play important roles. Our technical expertise is unrivaled, and we are continually creating not only new products but new ways to produce them. We can let the Chinese manufacture all the toys Mattel and WalMart can sell, but we can still beat them where it counts. I think that you badly underestimate the value of both the American worker and the American educational system. We are the most productive people in the world. Let's start acting like we realize that.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2008
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 927

United_States     Ireland

Re: Land of the Free and the home of the lame

I was against both ideas and our government has no business handing out money to 'save' anybody.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2008
chassisman's Avatar
Secretary of State
Right Wing Extremist

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: bible belt
Posts: 11,192

United_States     Texas

Re: Land of the Free and the home of the lame

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpsartre12 View Post
Since I hadn't been posting here in quite a while, I thought that the rules against personal attacks must have been loosened. after the above exchange. Was my assumption in err?
They can ban me or whatever, I posted a legit topic and I get this fucking childish crap. It gets to making this place really not worth it.
__________________

I needs government help to live.
I must be a liberal.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2008
mudwhistle's Avatar
Vice President
Strict Constitutionalist and Radical Right-wing Extremist

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Clarksville TN
Posts: 6,068
Blog Entries: 41

United_States     Montana

Re: Land of the Free and the home of the lame

Quote:
Originally Posted by chassisman View Post
THF, at this point I have been reduced to writing letters to elected officials with no (real) response. I also joined grassfire, but I'm sure the senators, congressmen, etc, who recieve grassfire corrospondence say "fuck 'em, they are too small to threaten my cushy lifestyle".
I have no desire to protest over gay marriage, abortion, etc. The bone I have to pick revolves around unacccountability and lack of transpareency. Take the auto bailout for instance. Any poll that can be cited shows the vast majority of Americans were against the bailout, yet our elected leaders , with their "Father knows best" mentality override the will of the people and go forward with it. Well Dad, if you're so f'n smart, why did we have to bail out wall street in the first place? Oh, I see..........Dad's an alky and Mom is on Xanex, so their judgement is FUBAR.
This is no government of the people, unless we decide lobbyists are "the people". Obama said he wants to run them offf, we shall see just how commited to that ray of "hope" he is.
In my fantasy, America has a national week of protest. Those that can make it to DC, go, those that cannot can go to their state capitol. People could stay a day or the week, as long as they made it there. Take your food with you. Go on buses, go on Amtrak, but GO.
And here is the message: You will represent US or WE will fill your seat with one of US. We are fed up with your waste, your partisan bickering, and lack of leadership. we are paying you to do a job and you aren't doing it.
A real fantasy, huh? In the last prez race we heard all this talk about experience. The thought of an "experienced" politician makes me want to hurl. Where has your experience landed us, oh great leaders?
Oh, just in a couple of wars and the biggest financial crisis of my lifetime.

Just a fantasy. that's all...........
The only committment Obama had was getting elected.


Now that he's in all of that rhetoric is out the window.
__________________
It's hard to stay mad at someone who makes you laugh - Jay Leno
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2008
mudwhistle's Avatar
Vice President
Strict Constitutionalist and Radical Right-wing Extremist

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Clarksville TN
Posts: 6,068
Blog Entries: 41

United_States     Montana

Re: Land of the Free and the home of the lame

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpsartre12 View Post
I'm way more comfortable with the auto bailout than I am with the Wall Street bailout. For one thing, the auto companies have hard assets that can be used to repay the loans.
I find it interesting that there wasn't a great outcry in the Senate over giving Wall Street $700Billion without any strings but they couldn't agree to give the auto industry a fraction of that amount replete with hoops.
The auto industry sufferes from the same credit crunch that crippled Wall Street, yet it had to go to Washington hat in hand to hear a bunch of over-spending failed legislators tell them how to run the auto industry. I heard no such reprimanding of the banking industry. unfuckinbelievable!
You have a few misconceptions.

First of all the money wasn't given to anyone without any strings. The strings are that they have to play ball and they forced some of the institutions to take the money.....whether they wanted it or not. New regulations will start coming down the pike forcing banks to loan to unqualified applicates or whatever rules Congress deems necessary they want enforced.

Secondly, they only gave out the first $350 bil. The rest of it is still in the Treasury waiting to be called upon by the President for further bailouts. The auto industry got the last of the first $350 bil.

Thirdly, the American auto industries had to kiss Congress's behind and they still didn't get nada from them. The President is the guy that gave it to them. What was the sticking point? Large Trucks and SUVs. The auto industry would have gotten it without any hearings if they had decided to get rid of their SUV line. But since trucks and SUVs are their best sellers that would have been like cutting their own throats. But that is what the Dems wanted.

The President pretty much gave the AAI a short-term loan to get them through the next few months. Then it will be Obama and the new Congress's problem. Then they can bully the industry all they want.
__________________
It's hard to stay mad at someone who makes you laugh - Jay Leno

Last edited by mudwhistle; 12-22-2008 at 12:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2008
jpsartre12's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: On the Right of most issues
Posts: 5,795

United_States     Michigan

Re: Land of the Free and the home of the lame

Quote:
Originally Posted by partofme View Post
I'm not saying I love the bailout but I do think doing nothing would have been a disaster. So go ahead and sell me on how awesome the big three are. I would love to hear it.
If you want a detailed answer, start a new thread. I'll give you the Cliff Notes version here.
Consumers won't buy vehicles from a bankrupt company because they would be concerned that warrantees wouldn't be honored. That would cause the number of Big Three vehicles sold to dramatically decrease, leading to more plant closures and more displaced auto workers.
Letting the Big Three declare bankrupsy would have eliminated their requirement to pay its suppliers, causing them to scramble to pay their employees, raw material suppliers, etc., which leads to more layoffs in secondary industries.
Restaurants and small businesses that depend on these autoworkers and suppliers would lose business and become further collateral damage.
Now, let's talk pension funds. A bankrupsy causes all outstanding stock to lose all of its value, leading to disastrous losses in pension funds for millions of people unrelated to the auto industry.
It's been reported that for every auto job lost, there are 10 additional jobs lost in supplier and other locations, so a collapse of the US auto industry would result in the loss of 3 million total jobs. That's not a hit that the country needs. (By comparison, every job lost in the financial industry results in an addition loss of 1-2 people per job lost)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHighForester View Post
Then you must not be aware that the United States is STILL the largest manufacturing nation in that "world economy." We not only can compete effectively and successfully--we are doing it in hundreds of products right now. It is well known, for example, that Toyota, Honda, Nissan,, Mecedes-Benz, and BMW have recently built and are profitably operating automobile manufacturing plants in the United States. How can you then argue that the auto industry in this country is dead? We continue to be the leading producer of components in many heavy manufacturing endeavors--Caterpillar, for example, has no peer in the production of heavy machinery anywhere in the world, Boeing (which has been woefully mismanaged of late) continues to be the giant among aircraft manufacturers, while Lockheed, McDonnell-Douglas, General Dynamics, and GE also play important roles. Our technical expertise is unrivaled, and we are continually creating not only new products but new ways to produce them. We can let the Chinese manufacture all the toys Mattel and WalMart can sell, but we can still beat them where it counts. I think that you badly underestimate the value of both the American worker and the American educational system. We are the most productive people in the world. Let's start acting like we realize that.
The transplants built plants in the US for three reasons:1. The US limits auto imports. 2. States gave transplants hundreds of millions in tax abatements, property and other incentives in order to do so. 3. They don't have to use UAW labor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DammitBoy! View Post
I was against both ideas and our government has no business handing out money to 'save' anybody.
The gov't created the mess when Clinton forced FANNIE MAE to give risky mortgages to unqualified applicants starting in 1997.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chassisman View Post
They can ban me or whatever, I posted a legit topic and I get this fucking childish crap. It gets to making this place really not worth it.
I'm OK with hand-to-hand combat when necessary. Unfortunately, I felt like this place was over-censoring. That's why I took a self-imposed sabattical for over a year and just recently decided to try again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mudwhistle View Post
The only committment Obama had was getting elected.

Now that he's in all of that rhetoric is out the window.
That's exactly right. If you elect an unprincipled pragmatist, you shouldn't be surprised when he acts like one once in office.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mudwhistle View Post
You have a few misconceptions.

First of all the money wasn't given to anyone without any strings. The strings are that they have to play ball and they forced some of the institutions to take the money.....whether they wanted it or not. New regulations will start coming down the pike forcing banks to loan to unqualified applicates or whatever rules Congress deems necessary they want enforced.
New regulations will "START COMING". Thanks for reinforcing my contention that they were given the money without prior strings, unlike the auto industry.
Quote:
Secondly, they only gave out the first $350 bil. The rest of it is still in the Treasury waiting to be called upon by the President for further bailouts. The auto industry got the last of the first $350 bil.
What's your point? The source of the money is irrelevant, we were speaking of the strings attached to it.
Quote:
Thirdly, the American auto industries had to kiss Congress's behind and they still didn't get nada from them. The President is the guy that gave it to them. What was the sticking point? Large Trucks and SUVs. The auto industry would have gotten it without any hearings if they had decided to get rid of their SUV line. But since trucks and SUVs are their best sellers that would have been like cutting their own throats. But that is what the Dems wanted.
You are wrong. Southern Republicans refused to end cloture because the UAW refused to IMMEDIATELY conform to non-UAW wage levels. They wanted to bloody the UAW's nose for two reasons. 1. The UAW pumps $millions into Democratic candidate campaigns. 2. They didn't want UAW workers to make more than their constituents working for lower wages in Transplant plants.
Quote:
The President pretty much gave the AAI a short-term loan to get them through the next few months. Then it will be Obama and the new Congress's problem. Then they can bully the industry all they want.
Most politicians don't want to have the death of the US auto industry in their resume. As for reforming the industry, that was in the works long before the financial crisis occurred.
__________________
843rd Bomb Wing - Strategic Air Command
"Peace is our Profession"

"Human law must rest its authority ultimately upon the authority of that law which is Divine. . . . Far from being rivals or enemies, religion and law are twin sisters, friends, and mutual assistants.
" - James Wilson, U. S. Supreme Court Justice and Signer of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2008
partofme's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 15,986

Earth     United_States

Re: Land of the Free and the home of the lame

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpsartre12 View Post
If you want a detailed answer, start a new thread. I'll give you the Cliff Notes version here.
Consumers won't buy vehicles from a bankrupt company because they would be concerned that warrantees wouldn't be honored. That would cause the number of Big Three vehicles sold to dramatically decrease, leading to more plant closures and more displaced auto workers.
Letting the Big Three declare bankrupsy would have eliminated their requirement to pay its suppliers, causing them to scramble to pay their employees, raw material suppliers, etc., which leads to more layoffs in secondary industries.
Restaurants and small businesses that depend on these autoworkers and suppliers would lose business and become further collateral damage.
Now, let's talk pension funds. A bankrupsy causes all outstanding stock to lose all of its value, leading to disastrous losses in pension funds for millions of people unrelated to the auto industry.
It's been reported that for every auto job lost, there are 10 additional jobs lost in supplier and other locations, so a collapse of the US auto industry would result in the loss of 3 million total jobs. That's not a hit that the country needs. (By comparison, every job lost in the financial industry results in an addition loss of 1-2 people per job lost)

But that still doesn't explain how the big three are going to manage to be any more viable in the long term than they are now. It's still just delaying the inevitable. The financial system bail out prevent much larger job losses than that. If consumers can't get credit to buy cars, houses, and other goods and then businesses are not able to get credit to make new investments then it would have bee much worse than the bankruptcy of the big three.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2008
mudwhistle's Avatar
Vice President
Strict Constitutionalist and Radical Right-wing Extremist

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Clarksville TN
Posts: 6,068
Blog Entries: 41

United_States     Montana

Re: Land of the Free and the home of the lame

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpsartre12 View Post



You are wrong. Southern Republicans refused to end cloture because the UAW refused to IMMEDIATELY conform to non-UAW wage levels. They wanted to bloody the UAW's nose for two reasons. 1. The UAW pumps $millions into Democratic candidate campaigns. 2. They didn't want UAW workers to make more than their constituents working for lower wages in Transplant plants.
I'm sorry but you misunderstood what I was talking about.

You gave the media version of what transpired but the reason the Big Three were forced to prostrate themselves before Congress was because Congress wants to force them to do business the way they want them to. It's all part of their Global Warming initiative. The only reason the money wasn't just awarded to them is because they wanted to tie them to the whipping post and make a spectacle of them.

Democrats in Congress have no intention of allowing their lobbyist's (The UAW) noses to be bloodied. But if the GOP members were able to do so it is a small price to pay considering what Democrats have in mind for the auto industry and the oil industry.

They fully intend on taking them over.

They want to change our mode of transportation to electrical or force the industry into building unaffordable cars that run off of anything other then fossil fuels.

Yes, the Democrats want to make our lives less affordable. They want to enforce regulations that jack up the prices of everything.

Did you know that the Democrats in Congress made sure that China got the Iraqi oil production contracts that were awarded earlier this year because of their insane insistence on ridiculous "Green" initiatives?

The GD Democrats are going to ruin this country, force it into bankruptcy and assure that our lives are more and more expensive every day.
__________________
It's hard to stay mad at someone who makes you laugh - Jay Leno
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online