Thread: Censorship is terrible, no censorship in hollywood is worse!

Nicely put Mrs. M.
I agree!

Originally Posted by Michael_Q

And a very Merry Christmas to you sir.

Always happy to rip your rather transparent points to shreds in front of your face.

Originally Posted by Tanngrisnir3

Always happy to rip your rather transparent points to shreds in front of your face.

And a Happy New Year

It depends on the morals and ethics at our disposal at any given time. We do not operate in a vacuum of Nurture.

Our objective reality exists in Nature.

Better infrastructure could enable better morals and ethics, even with the full faith and credit of public acts; which are also a basis for morals and that are enumerated in our First Amendment when our republic was ordained and established by our Founding Fathers who were glorious patriots to our republic.

I am bored of trying to clean up off topic posts and rock throwing.
Please cut it out...this thread seems to have lost it's way...perhaps closing it is better.

Originally Posted by Michael_Q

Easy, it's already been done in the 50's.

So you actually do want to censor Hollywood? Thanks for clarifying, comrade. Freedom be damned, Communist Michael_Q knows what's best for us, and he will program what we ought to be watching on TV and in movies.

Originally Posted by iamwhatiseem

I am bored of trying to clean up off topic posts and rock throwing.
Please cut it out...this thread seems to have lost it's way...perhaps closing it is better.

Uh, ya think? The op doesn't actually want to discuss the topic. This thread (and others) is just a clearinghouse for "what's wrong with this country, according to Michael_Q.".

Originally Posted by iamwhatiseem

I am bored of trying to clean up off topic posts and rock throwing.
Please cut it out...this thread seems to have lost it's way...perhaps closing it is better.

It's lost it's way starting from the OP. Close it.

Originally Posted by Michael_Q

Speaking of "clues"....only the liberal mind can't see that they've been outsmarted by a bunch of camel jockeys who realized that all they had to do is take off their uniforms, stop flying their flags and hide among the sympathetic population, and the liberals in America would win the war for them. You keep worrying about killing the enemy, I'm worried about Americans being killed by islam. Imaginary borders on a map shouldn't completely cripple us, and neither should animals who don't subscribe to the rules of war. They deserve nothing. We need to adapt instead of clinging to these stupid "kiss their asses" policies.

So a better plan is just to kill them all? And thats not going to piss of even more of them and get them to take up arms against us as well?

Yes, I worry about killing the wrong people. Both for our sakes and theirs; if this war is for our values then how are we winning by betraying them? If we're fighting a popular insurgency then perhaps it might be a good idea not to create more innocent deaths?

Originally Posted by Michael_Q

You're right about one thing. We can't win a war when a segment of our own population is bent on defeat. And please...I get so intimidated when you display such intellectual words as"bullshit". "Innocent civilians", why the hell aren't you concerned about the "innocent civilians" that were slaughtered on 9-11? They attacked us, we didn't attack them.

Yes I am. But then advocting killing a couple of million people in response does no one any favours. All it does is escalate things and make a whole lot more people hate you.

Don't you remeamber the way the war went against Japan before we nuked the two cities? (not to mention that we where actually at war with Japan) that only worked because they'd been worn down by the war and where on the verge of surrender.

Originally Posted by iamwhatiseem

I am bored of trying to clean up off topic posts and rock throwing.
Please cut it out...this thread seems to have lost it's way...perhaps closing it is better.

I know Michael_Q wouldn't mind. He likes censorship.

I don't believe censorship is the answer without religious morals tests and anti-hypocrisy laws.

Originally Posted by Michael_Q

We had the same "First Amendment" in 1950 but there was a reasonable level of censorship and no one seemed deprived. Now we have no censorship at all, everything is acceptable. You really think that's better, especially with the amount of time children these days are unsupervised?

The First Amendment has been dismantled by liberal lawyers and our society has suffered.

I presume you understand why those laws got struck down?

And also you understand that Children are far more supervised nowdays than ever before?

And also that your two assertions, that the first amendment has been dismantled AND that its now too strong are mututally contradictory?