Nah, let's think about your obsession with all things gay, and how this is indicative of nothing in particular about any sort of media, other than those that also obsess with them
Visit the Archives for U.S. Politics Online -- U.S. Politics Online . net







Lets think about this.
A "homosexual" advocate of "gay marriage" kills another "homosexual" in a "drug and alcohol-induced stupor" after or during a session of S & M in one of their basements. The mudstream media is silent.
A "homosexual" University official was accused of raping his adopted 5-year-old son and offering the child to someone else and the media omitted the fact that Lombard is a homosexual who lives with another "gay" man.
I wonder if the mudstream media would have forgotten to mention a man that attended church regularly who killed a women (or even another man) in a "drug and alcohol-induced stupor" after or during a session of S & M in one of their basements ?
I wonder if the mudstream media would have failed to mention that a man attended church regularly and was accused of raping his adopted 5-year-old son and then offering the child to someone else ?
We're supposed to believe that the mainstream media doesn't have an agenda to push ? We're supposed to believe that the mainstream media isn't marketing evil to us by what it does and does not report ?
This is why many of us ignore the "mudstream" media and the propoganda it pushes at us. Other than to observe what they're doing of course.
---------------------------------------------------------
'Gay-on-gay' attack going to trial
Jury selection is scheduled to begin tomorrow and opening arguments are only days away in a trial over the "sordid" slaying of a homosexual man by a same-sex-marriage advocate in Maine.
....news coverage of the case is being suppressed because of its links to the homosexual community.
Bruce LaVallee-Davidson of Skowhegan, Maine, is charged with manslaughter in the springtime gun-related death of Fred Wilson of South Portland.
According to The Record, published by the Civic League, "Despite the sordid nature of the crime, reports published at the time portrayed Wilson and LaVallee-Davidson as innocent as choirboys. To date, there has been no mention in the mainstream press of what actually happened in the basement of Fred Wilson's home in South Portland. Indeed, the mainstream press added to the confusion by reporting that the shooting was 'a kind of Russian Roulette' gone wrong."
"Because of the victim's connections to the sadomasochistic subculture and the location and time of the crime – a Friday night in the basement of Wilson's home – it is almost certain that the shooter and the victim were engaged in debauchery during the evening, and that LaVallee-Davidson pulled the trigger in a drug and alcohol-induced stupor."
The Record further reported, "This conjecture was further confirmed by the unexpected revelation that Wilson was a member of the Portland Harbor Masters, a group dedicated to the practice of sadomasochism. Incidentally, Davidson's same sex marriage partner, Buck, was not at the party that evening."
Because of the victim's connections to the homosexual bondage-and-discipline, sadomasochistic subculture and the location and time of the crime – a Friday night in the basement of Wilson's house – it is almost certain that the shooter and the victim were engaged in debauchery during the evening, and that LaVallee-Davidson pulled the trigger in a drug and alcohol-induced stupor. This conjecture was confirmed by the unexpected revelation that Wilson was a member of Portland's Harbor Masters homosexual leather club, a group dedicated to the practice of sadomasochism.
The case of homosexual-related crime being ignored by the national media is hardly unique.
In July, WND reported news coverage of Duke University official Frank Lombard, accused of raping his adopted 5-year-old son and offering the child to someone else, omitted the fact that Lombard is a homosexual who lives with another "gay" man.
A Free Press for a Free People






Nah, let's think about your obsession with all things gay, and how this is indicative of nothing in particular about any sort of media, other than those that also obsess with them







Yes, our media should focus on homosexuality a lot more than they already do so that certain people can get their homo-fix in more easily.
Sounds pretty 'normal' to me, in the sense that there are plenty of heterosexual pedophiles and murderers too. Strangely we don't hear about the vast majority of heterosexual murders and pedophiles either.
Noone accused homosexuals of being "better" than everyone else. Just like blacks can be murderers, pedophiles and thieves, homosexuals can be too. I'm pretty sure whites can be too.







Since you're obsessed with my "obsession" about "gays" and their ridiculous obsession for social approval of their disgusting bedroom activities, here's an article I found to raise yer hackles
----------------------------
Date: 1/8/2010 8:24:04 AM
Great news on the pro-family front today as the New Jersey Senate hosed same-sex marriage 20-14. This means that marriage, in the last 14 months, has lost at the polls in California and Maine and lost in state legislatures in both New York and New Jersey. The people and their elected officials don't want to tamper with the institution of marriage, which means gay activists are left with their sadly successful strategy of counting on activist judges to impose their values on the people and their representatives.
The all-out effort to get a vote on same-sex marriage in the New Jersey senate before Chris Christie becomes the state's next governor on January 19 is significant for another reason. It has been my conviction from the beginning that the homosexual agenda is not about rights, as homosexuals claim, but about recognition. It's about forcing society to grant its sanction, its approval, its endorsement for their sexually aberrant behavior.
New Jersey offers proof of this thesis, for this simple reason: in the Garden State, same-sex couples who enter into civil unions already have all the legal rights of married couples. If they had been successful, homosexuals wouldn't have gained a single right they do not already possess. What they would have gained is a word: "marriage." They want that word, because they know it represents society's ultimate seal of approval. It's a word we must never give them.
Gay Agenda not about rights, it's about approval
----------------------------
That ought to keep you energized for awhile![]()






No, not at all. It means what it said: over time, you've built up quite the record of hysterical, obsessive gay preoccupation. You don't have to leave them alone, I'm just adding context to your post.No, I tend to protect anyone who hasn't done anything wrong.
This has to do with the media actually. I know you have a kind of odd mother bear instinct regarding "gays."Translation: you're not interested in rational analysis of any situation dealing with gays, but rather want to breathlessly portray this as some NeverNever Land endictment of the media.
That's your issue and I'm really not interested in it today.
So the lesson to be learned is:
Get all your fag news from Worldnet Daily?
http://willblogforfood.typepad.com/w.../ovshinsky.jpg
The world could use more Stan Ovshinsky's







I think you're confusing "the main stream media" with "porn sites". Those are actually two different things. Only one of them will provide you with constant salacious story lines about homosexual sadomasochism. The "mainstream media" tends to do a more broad sampling of news stories than you appear to be looking for.
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."
-Thomas Jefferson












The lessen to be learned here is that old lame-street media doesn't tell the whole story, slants things to cover their agenda (whatever that is at the moment), and when it suits them... doesn't report things at all.
The point the good Captain was trying to make is this is, or should be: a story that the MSM should be all over... sex, drugs, a murder trial, forbidden love, etc, etc. The old adage being 'if it bleeds it leads'
Yet strangely... the dog did not bark.
Here is Missouri we had a former politician that was arrested for what was, admitted by the complaining party consensual S&M sex... arrested for assault. No one was injured, no one died, things... in the sober light of day, had gone 'too far' The media was all over it.
Here, two gay guys? Nothing.
That is the issue...







![]()
No, the real story is to get all your news from more than just mainstream media sources because, in spite of their claims, they do not offer the complete story. To rely on any one kind of news provider is the pursuit of fools.
Exactly.
So, if I'm reading this correctly, the 'conservative' take on this is that some sort of quota for media coverage should be established to make sure that all sexualities get equal time and representation? Would you guys suggest a government department be created for this, or would some heavy handed legislation about equal coverage suffice? Perhaps the latter could be called "Sexuality Fairness Doctrine"? That sounds friendly and politically correct!
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."
-Thomas Jefferson
Bookmarks