Thread: Are liberals becoming dangerous again?

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

And when was the last time a liberal bombed a health care facility because of the services they rendered or the information that they provided?!! Hmmm. I guess conservatives are dangerous too! Maybe it's not that people are either conservative or liberal- it's how intolerant they are of other people's beliefs.

Hold on there, pilgrim. Who said anything about the right not being guilty as well? The question is, "Are liberals becoming dangerous again?" not "Are liberals the sole danger to society?".

Originally Posted by fishjoel

Hold on there, pilgrim. Who said anything about the right not being guilty as well? The question is, "Are liberals becoming dangerous again?" not "Are liberals the sole danger to society?".

The question remains unanswered: Have liberals ever been dangerous? When?

Originally Posted by Joe Stack's suicide letter

The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.



Joe Stack (1956-2010)

02/18/2010

Left-wingers have always been known for their completely irrational behavior.

Originally Posted by Dick Martin

The question remains unanswered: Have liberals ever been dangerous? When?

Yes, our president has hung out with a domestic terrorist.

Originally Posted by goober

Well, I guess if a woman keys 3 SUVs in a Walmart parking lot, it's a national trend that can be laid at the feet of all Liberals.
I certainly believe that all conservatives suck off strangers in public toilets, you know, based on the evidence....

He’s just some sexual deviate that needed to be brought back into the world the hard way, In fact, he was practicing a liberal ideology (You guys call it a lifestyle don’t you???)…
The keying of SUV’s is a wide spread problem associated with the liberal ideology of their greenhouse gas thing, they set dealerships on fire and even destroy housing developments for their urban sprawl movements.
I really don’t think the “look at them not at us” thingy works much any more.

Originally Posted by Speakeasy

Discuss what?

When liberals first started rock and rolling they were very dangerous. Whatever it took from executing bank guards so there funding sources were part of their movements to bombings and fires to animal research companies and arms manufacturers. They chilled for about 35 years but seem to be going stupid again. Someone ran down my flag pole when I was flying it in format for “country in distress” when barrack husain obama appeared out of nowhere. I’m worried of someone keying my SUV or even causing harm to my family if I choose to have a bumper sticker that might disagree with their version of “freedom of speech.
They lost on their fight against Christmas and all of their efforts were for nothing as all major chains have gone back to calling it Christmas again, this concerns me on decorating my house. Will liberals simply vandalize them or should I be worried of something more extreme and dangerous when they try to teach me a lesson.

Originally Posted by fishjoel

Yes, our president has hung out with a domestic terrorist.

He didn't really "hang out with" William Ayers, and at the time he had anything to do with him Ayers was an ex-terrorist. And when he WAS a terrorist (or at least a saboteur), does it make sense to call Ayers a liberal? Most people would consider the Weathermen to be far-left radicals.

I remember in fact that during the 2008 campaign, this association was used to paint Obama as a far-left radical himself. It's now clear, though, that he's not only more conservative than that, but more conservative than he portrayed himself in the campaign. So it's clear enough that Ayers is far to the left of Obama even in his current views, let along the ones he held in the early 1970s.

Originally Posted by RDK

I don’t think political ideology has anything to do with the danger to society by either side.

I disagree; the only police action needed at a “Tea Party” rally is traffic control. When liberals show up in those old school busses the police are in riot gear and the businesses are closed and boarded up.

The danger to society is the anger and hatred so easily turned to vandalism or violence that these differences bring out in many of the people at both extremes of the political spectrum.

It could happen, but only liberals format it intentionally into the theme of their protests.

We see some examples here, anyone who is firmly on one side or the other can expect to get some nasty comments back on some of the most innocuous posts.

Again not the same. One side doesn’t consider it an organized group strategy to keep another’s message from being heard.

I’m not sure how long this has been in the making but the increased pace of life with the internet, cell phones etc. must be contributing to the stress and increased pace of life. It’s kind of ironic that the technology that makes it easier to communicate can be driving us apart as communities. ( This is not only a n American event but is showing up in connected societies worldwide.)

It’s only occurring with one side. No one cared or listened to their cries so they began freaking out the establishment. Today they call it ‘in your face”.
We just want to work hard, enjoy life’s pleasures and not have to worry that someone will scream obscenities out the window in front of your children because they were told were bashing Japan because we have a “Buy American” bumper sticker on our SUV.

Originally Posted by Bottlecap

When liberals first started rock and rolling they were very dangerous. Whatever it took from executing bank guards so there funding sources were part of their movements to bombings and fires to animal research companies and arms manufacturers. They chilled for about 35 years but seem to be going stupid again. Someone ran down my flag pole when I was flying it in format for “country in distress” when barrack husain obama appeared out of nowhere. I’m worried of someone keying my SUV or even causing harm to my family if I choose to have a bumper sticker that might disagree with their version of “freedom of speech.
They lost on their fight against Christmas and all of their efforts were for nothing as all major chains have gone back to calling it Christmas again, this concerns me on decorating my house. Will liberals simply vandalize them or should I be worried of something more extreme and dangerous when they try to teach me a lesson.

Really? I mean, seriously?

I mean, I guess I can't expect logical thought out of someone who actually thinks the Earth is 6,000 years old.

Originally Posted by Dragontalk

He didn't really "hang out with" William Ayers, and at the time he had anything to do with him Ayers was an ex-terrorist. And when he WAS a terrorist (or at least a saboteur), does it make sense to call Ayers a liberal? Most people would consider the Weathermen to be far-left radicals.

I remember in fact that during the 2008 campaign, this association was used to paint Obama as a far-left radical himself. It's now clear, though, that he's not only more conservative than that, but more conservative than he portrayed himself in the campaign. So it's clear enough that Ayers is far to the left of Obama even in his current views, let along the ones he held in the early 1970s.

Yes...Ayers was a liberal and still is a liberal. Also, calling him an "ex-terrorist" doesn't really mean much when he got off of the charges based on technicalities. He should be in jail still. He's also never recanted his actions. His girlfriend blew herself up making a bomb too. But yes...he's a liberal.

Originally Posted by Speakeasy

Really? I mean, seriously?

I mean, I guess I can't expect logical thought out of someone who actually thinks the Earth is 6,000 years old.

Not really related to the OP and is kinda close to a personal attack.

Originally Posted by dblack

Originally Posted by goober

Well, I guess if a woman keys 3 SUVs in a Walmart parking lot, it's a national trend that can be laid at the feet of all Liberals.
I certainly believe that all conservatives suck off strangers in public toilets, you know, based on the evidence....

It's only logical.

[SARCASM]Yes, republicans can be profiled by their homosexual lifestyles the same as liberals can be with their fires and turned over cars.[/SARCASM]

Originally Posted by Dragontalk

He didn't really "hang out with" William Ayers, and at the time he had anything to do with him Ayers was an ex-terrorist. And when he WAS a terrorist (or at least a saboteur), does it make sense to call Ayers a liberal? Most people would consider the Weathermen to be far-left radicals.

I think that because media guys like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity etc. have overused the term "liberal" so much that they have perverted the meaning of the word.

Were the weathermen liberals? I don't think so. They were fucking commie/pinkos.