Visit the Archives for U.S. Politics Online -- U.S. Politics Online . net
Obviously I disagree with him and could care less about his opinion. My point is only to give him more publicity so as to let people see what a socialist he is. I say give him his own show on MSNBC."They're sitting on the money, they're using it for their own -- they're putting it someplace else with no interest in helping you with your life, with that money. We've allowed them to take that. That's not theirs, that's a national resource, that's ours. We all have this -- we all benefit from this or we all suffer as a result of not having it," Michael Moore told Laura Flanders of GRITtv.
"I think we need to go back to taxing these people at the proper rates. They need to -- we need to see these jobs as something we some, that we collectively own as Americans and you can't just steal our jobs and take them someplace else," Moore concluded.
RealClearPolitics - Video - Moore On Wealthy People's Money: "That's Not Theirs, That's A National Resource, It's Ours"
Michael Moore's a dipshit.
Have another burger, Mike. Your heart attack can't be far away...
I love teh fact he also uses NON UNION LABOR on his fils to save money..
“Are vital U.S. interests more imperiled by what happens in Iraq where were have 50,000 troops, or Afghanistan where we have 100,000, or South Korea where we have 28,000 -- or by what is happening on our border with Mexico?...What does it profit America if we save Anbar and lose Arizona?”
P, Buchanan
http://faceswaps.files.wordpress.com...ke-it-rain.gif





This is now a departure from his usual socialism rhetoric and is borderline communism now. It is almost hinting at that "common ownership" of wealth to suggest what he did or a part of communism. This part below somewhat hits that point home on his ideal views of the United States as a communist state. He is speaking about wealth, and his belief that all are entitled to it. More so, he is advocating wealth confiscation and theft suggesting one's ownership of their wealth does not exist in his view.
That's not theirs, that's a national resource, that's ours. We all have this -- we all benefit from this or we all suffer as a result of not having it.
Last edited by Sluggo; 03-03-2011 at 09:00 AM. Reason: mistake
- Frustrated Independent
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
"Every time something really bad happens, people cry out for safety, and the government answers by taking rights away from good people.” - Penn Jillette amazingly enough, and I agree.
I wonder if Moore believes that his money belongs to everyone...





- Frustrated Independent
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
"Every time something really bad happens, people cry out for safety, and the government answers by taking rights away from good people.” - Penn Jillette amazingly enough, and I agree.
Never trust a man who doesn't swear!
“Are vital U.S. interests more imperiled by what happens in Iraq where were have 50,000 troops, or Afghanistan where we have 100,000, or South Korea where we have 28,000 -- or by what is happening on our border with Mexico?...What does it profit America if we save Anbar and lose Arizona?”
P, Buchanan
http://faceswaps.files.wordpress.com...ke-it-rain.gif






Good old Mike Moore. He's a nut. Just like Beck. Two peas in a pod.
Moore makes a great target though. I am liberal but not like this guy. I know that breaks some hearts here, when a liberal thinks Moore is a nutcase. But there ya go.














Stolen from Malkin---
Yesterday, Michael Moore said that the money of wealthy Americans “isn’t theres, it’s ours,” and is a “national resource.”
This is why the wealthy filmmaker has taken the unprecedented step of posting his bank account numbers online so all Americans can have access to the vital national resource that is “our” money. I’m impressed by th… what? He didn’t do that? I would have expected otherwise because he’s usually not hypocritical that way….
“Are vital U.S. interests more imperiled by what happens in Iraq where were have 50,000 troops, or Afghanistan where we have 100,000, or South Korea where we have 28,000 -- or by what is happening on our border with Mexico?...What does it profit America if we save Anbar and lose Arizona?”
P, Buchanan
http://faceswaps.files.wordpress.com...ke-it-rain.gif
Bookmarks