Please point out where I said it should be legal for businesses to abuse children. What you refer to as "abuse" is the children's decision to work at the business. On the contrary, what I am doing is giving children the choice to work there, if they so choose to. What the current child labor laws do is they prevent children from working at businesses even if they want to. If it is removed, all the children would have to do to avoid "abuse" is the same thing they are doing now. Child labor laws are nanny-state pieces of legislature.

But it appears that you have decided to take the easy way out of this argument, seeing as you have lost, because you could not address my well-formed reply.

__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.