Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Economic Issues

Economic Issues Business, Commerce, Consumer Affairs, Economics, Public Finance, Trade

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2007
buscow buscow is offline
Concerned Citizen

 
Member Since: May 2006
Posts: 59

   
Re: Wal-Mart donates $272.9 million to charity in 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheBurgh View Post
It's all about the unions. Bottom line. The unions think they are entitled to have everyone in the country unionized and every worker in the country pay them to do absolutely nothing for you. They can't stand Wal-Mart because Wal-Mart has managed to stave off unionization of their employees and they are a huge employer so the unions see unionizing their company as a huge cash cow and they are pissed that they can't get it. So, they have been demonizing them in attempts to pressure them into unionizing and lobbying State governments as well as the Feds to do the same. The fact that people working a cash register or stocking shelves should be in a union is laughable at best, but it's all about the AFL-CIO keeping itself relevant and making money.

Thanks


It seams like no one ever talks about the Unions making money
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2007
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,664

United_States    
Re: Wal-Mart donates $272.9 million to charity in 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by CDavidNeely View Post
Greetings and Felicitations,



The money collected by associates is paid in cash and kept separate from other money. I know how this works because that is where I work.

From the article:



Sincerely Yours,
C. David Neely
I still dont see how thats any different. The employees are the company.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2007
timj219's Avatar
timj219 timj219 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 4,765

United_States     New_York

Re: Wal-Mart donates $272.9 million to charity in 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
I still dont see how thats any different. The employees are the company.
Exactly wrong. As you yourself have previously pointed out, the shareholders are the company and its only purpose is to increase shareholder value. One could make the argument that the executives are the company since they set direction and dictate most activities. But the employees are most definititly not the company.
__________________
A nation of slaves is always prepared to applaud the clemency of their master who, in the abuse of absolute power, does not proceed to the utmost extremes of injustice and oppression.
Edward Gibbon
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2007
CDavidNeely's Avatar
CDavidNeely CDavidNeely is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Neo-Rationalist

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: US North America Terra
Posts: 1,964

United    
Re: Wal-Mart donates $272.9 million to charity in 2006

Greetings and Felicitations,

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
I still dont see how thats any different. The employees are the company.
I think there is a fundamental difference in the two statments:

Walmart took 272.9 million dollars from its profits and donated it to charity.

Versus

Walmart employees collected 272.9 million dollars and donated it to charity.

I think there is a big difference between the employees and the company. For example, Walmart just instituted a dress code for employees that involves blue shirt and khaki pants. Many of the employees are not happy about this change but the corporate rules are being enforced without their input.

Sincerely Yours,
C. David Neely
__________________
An environmentalist once told me that humanity was a failed species and needed to die out. I am beginning to see her point. We have poisoned the air, the water, the land and ourselves. By the year 2025 we will be on the edge of a catastrophy of unimaginable devastation and I hope that those that come after will have learned a vital lesson.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2007
Americano Americano is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 5,661

   
Re: Wal-Mart donates $272.9 million to charity in 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by CDavidNeely View Post
I think there is a big difference between the employees and the company. For example, Walmart just instituted a dress code for employees that involves blue shirt and khaki pants. Many of the employees are not happy about this change but the corporate rules are being enforced without their input.
Why would employee input be required to establish a corporate policy? The company isn't owned by or operated for employees.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2007
Americano Americano is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 5,661

   
Re: Wal-Mart donates $272.9 million to charity in 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
I still dont see how thats any different. The employees are the company.
No, unless they own company stock, they're employed by the company, nothing else.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2007
CDavidNeely's Avatar
CDavidNeely CDavidNeely is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Neo-Rationalist

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: US North America Terra
Posts: 1,964

United    
Re: Wal-Mart donates $272.9 million to charity in 2006

Greetings and Felicitations,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Americano View Post
Why would employee input be required to establish a corporate policy? The company isn't owned by or operated for employees.
Walmart makes a big thing about employee participation and respect for individuality. I was making a response to the post about walmart being its employees.


Sincerely Yours,
C. David Neely
__________________
An environmentalist once told me that humanity was a failed species and needed to die out. I am beginning to see her point. We have poisoned the air, the water, the land and ourselves. By the year 2025 we will be on the edge of a catastrophy of unimaginable devastation and I hope that those that come after will have learned a vital lesson.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2007
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,664

United_States    
Re: Wal-Mart donates $272.9 million to charity in 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by CDavidNeely View Post
Greetings and Felicitations,



I think there is a fundamental difference in the two statments:

Walmart took 272.9 million dollars from its profits and donated it to charity.

Versus

Walmart employees collected 272.9 million dollars and donated it to charity.

I think there is a big difference between the employees and the company. For example, Walmart just instituted a dress code for employees that involves blue shirt and khaki pants. Many of the employees are not happy about this change but the corporate rules are being enforced without their input.

Sincerely Yours,
C. David Neely

Ok, but Walmart isnt a person. Walmart is made up of people. Those people took from their salary, which comes from Walmarts revenue. So, in essence, Walmart gave the money to their employees to give to charity. Its very fluid.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2007
CDavidNeely's Avatar
CDavidNeely CDavidNeely is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Neo-Rationalist

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: US North America Terra
Posts: 1,964

United    
Re: Wal-Mart donates $272.9 million to charity in 2006

Greetings and Felicitations,

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
So, in essence, Walmart gave the money to their employees to give to charity. Its very fluid.
Walmart does give the money to their employees. Their employees worked for it. Your reply insinuates that the employees didn't do anything to get it but simply received it. I, at least, give an honest days labor for the money I get and no one gave it to me. I worked for it.

Sincerely Yours,
C. David Neely
__________________
An environmentalist once told me that humanity was a failed species and needed to die out. I am beginning to see her point. We have poisoned the air, the water, the land and ourselves. By the year 2025 we will be on the edge of a catastrophy of unimaginable devastation and I hope that those that come after will have learned a vital lesson.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2007
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,664

United_States    
Re: Wal-Mart donates $272.9 million to charity in 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by CDavidNeely View Post
Greetings and Felicitations,



Walmart does give the money to their employees. Their employees worked for it. Your reply insinuates that the employees didn't do anything to get it but simply received it. I, at least, give an honest days labor for the money I get and no one gave it to me. I worked for it.

Sincerely Yours,
C. David Neely
Its the same thing in my mind as it relates to a business. You might also say that Walmarts customer donated the money by buying things.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2007
SamInTheSouth's Avatar
SamInTheSouth SamInTheSouth is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,705

South_Carolina     United_States

Re: Wal-Mart donates $272.9 million to charity in 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheBurgh
But today it isn't, so it doesn't matter if you or anyone else thinks it should be. The free market decides as to what kind of health insurance plan WalMart offers, or if they offer one at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by timj219 View Post
I'm sorry but that's nonsense too. If you want to do business and become wealthy in this country then you follow the laws. And if universal health care really does become a goal of the people in this country and if mandating employer-supplied health insurance is the best way to accomplish it then walmart will follw that law and supply health coverage. There is no such thing as a "free market" and there never has been.
What's nonsense? You didn't refute what I said. You keep talking about something that isn't reality or law today. I am talking about what IS the reality today. The reality is that employers are under no obligation to provide their employees with health insurance. That's a fact, Jack. It doesn't matter whether or not you agree with it. They don't have to do it. Period. If the government mandates that some day they do, that's a different story, but that hasn't happened so I don't know why you keep going back to that.
__________________
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

President George W. Bush, 8-5-2004

Carolina Politics Online

THIS IS REAL HOPE AND CHANGE!
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2007
timj219's Avatar
timj219 timj219 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 4,765

United_States     New_York

Re: Wal-Mart donates $272.9 million to charity in 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheBurgh View Post
What's nonsense? You didn't refute what I said. You keep talking about something that isn't reality or law today. I am talking about what IS the reality today. The reality is that employers are under no obligation to provide their employees with health insurance. That's a fact, Jack. It doesn't matter whether or not you agree with it. They don't have to do it. Period. If the government mandates that some day they do, that's a different story, but that hasn't happened so I don't know why you keep going back to that.
You said "The free market decides". The free market is a child's fantasy which has never and will never decide anything at all. So it's nonsense.
__________________
A nation of slaves is always prepared to applaud the clemency of their master who, in the abuse of absolute power, does not proceed to the utmost extremes of injustice and oppression.
Edward Gibbon
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2007
Mark_Twain's Avatar
Mark_Twain Mark_Twain is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 3,005

Vatican    
Re: Wal-Mart donates $272.9 million to charity in 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheBurgh View Post
What part of their business practices constitute as "shady"?
-Hiring of illegal immigrants?
-Destroying small-town economies?
-Negative environmental impacts?
-Lowering of real wages?
-Funding of right-wing/fascist causes?
-The "Buy American" campaign?
-Need more examples?
__________________


"The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no God. It neither breaks my leg, nor picks my pocket."

Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2007
Mark_Twain's Avatar
Mark_Twain Mark_Twain is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 3,005

Vatican    
Re: Wal-Mart donates $272.9 million to charity in 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
I think it's a great thing. If Wal-Mart didn't give a penny to charity, you people would be bitchin' about that.

I found this after a very brief search, having heard something about it last week:

Wal-Mart Announces Employee Bonuses
The Associated Press

March 22, 2007

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. has awarded bonuses totaling more than a half-billion dollars to more than half the giant retailer's hourly employees in the U.S., the company said Thursday.

Wal-Mart, which refers to its employees as 'associates,' said in a news release announcing the bonuses that it was designating Thursday as Associate Celebration Day. It also announced new programs intended to recognize service and performance.

The company said it has awarded more than $529.8 million in bonuses to a total of 813,759 Wal-Mart store and Sam's Club hourly workers in the U.S.

The company employs about 1.3 million people in the U.S.

The release did not specify how the bonuses were allocated.

The company has previously provided extra money to workers once a year through a program that provided what it calls 'My$hare' bonuses, allocated on the basis of store performance. Those bonuses will now be distributed quarterly, the release said, 'to reward performance on a more frequent basis.'

Among the new programs outlined in the announcement are what the company called 'Servant Leadership' bonuses, recognizing employees of 20 years or more with an extra week of pay. More than 13,400 employees have been with the company 20 years or longer, the company said.

Also announced as a new program was the 'Customer Champion' award, providing cash bonuses to employees 'who go above and beyond in providing excellent customer service.' That program will be launched during the summer, the company said.


Wal-Mart Bonuses

I dunno', maybe it's me, but half a billion dollars sounds pretty fuckin' substantial...

Allow me to put the half-billion in perspective for you, my dear friend.

The report didn't say how the bonuses were allocated. But let's assume they were applied evenly across the 813,759 million hourly employees who received a bonus (the other 1/2 million weren't worthy). This amounts to a bonus of $651.05 for each "associate." And if we assume a 40 hour work week over 52 weeks, this works out to a 31.3 cent/hour raise.

Whoop-de-fucking-do. When you're making $8/hour, another 31 cents/hour ain't gonna drag you above the poverty line.

Did you know that Wal-Mart brings in about $229,860,320 in PROFIT every single DAY!?!? (#s from their 2006 annual report)

Meaning that they gave up 2.3 days worth of revenue.

Again, whoop-de-fucking-doo.

I'd be much more impressed if they paid all of their employees a living wage & benefits.

They can obviously afford to do so.

(And now you probably see the reason that I avoid all Wal-Mart owned operations like the Bubonic Plague.)
__________________


"The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no God. It neither breaks my leg, nor picks my pocket."

Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2007
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,638

United_States    
Re: Wal-Mart donates $272.9 million to charity in 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by partofme View Post
How about promoting themselves as the store that carries products made in the U.S.A. and using that as a way to gain the business of customers and turning around and using their share of the retail market to force suppliers to manufacture their products in sweat shop factories in China to cut cost. That's just the first one to come to mind.
is that all? come now....because that doesn't come close to shady imho....bought a pair of sneakers lately?

and that’s not really what this about and we all know it...they provide low prices by keeping overhead down....and providing limited health care helps that is the health care industry at fault? Maybe but that’s another debate....since the fist company genius found a way to get around price and wage controls by offering free health care for employees in lieu of pay, back in the late 40's....the debate has been manufactured that health care is a now an employees right.....I would like everyone to be covered..no doubt..but is this a personal responsibility or a governmental one...or a company one? That’s the debate really.....imho....
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor

Last edited by Imperator; 03-31-2007 at 02:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.uspoliticsonline.com/economic-issues/37136-wal-mart-donates-272-9-million-charity-2006-a.html
Posted By For Type Date
Wal-Mart donates $272.9 million to charity in 2006 - U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum This thread Refback 03-29-2007 03:48 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:28 AM.