Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Economic Issues Business, Commerce, Consumer Affairs, Economics, Public Finance, Trade |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply
This has been going on since the 1960s. If the vaunted Democrat-majority congress wants to "make real changes" as they kept claiming during their campaigns, here's a good place to start. But are they trying?
So far, I've seen nothing from them in this area, except for attempts to make us drive less, and/or drive smaller, lighter, more dangerous cars. Even that cloud has a silver lining, though. If they keep this up, gas prices will rise so high that it will become economically practical to start developing alternate technology that has bee priced out of the market so far. ------------------------------------- CONGRESSIONAL CRITICISM MISSES MARK ON GAS PRICES As gas prices pass $3.00 a gallon, several members of Congress have taken aim once again at oil companies, promoting everything from a windfall profits tax to breaking the companies up. Yet rather than attacking "big oil," Congress should look in the mirror, says H. Sterling Burnett, senior fellow with the National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA). The real problem is that while energy prices are subject to the basic economic laws of supply and demand, Congress continually restricts supply, says Burnett. For instance: * Congress chose not to lift the moratorium on new oil and gas production on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf, putting more than 85 billion barrels of oil (quadruple current U.S. reserves) off limits. * Congress has repeatedly refused to allow oil development in the coastal plains of Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), putting 16 billion barrels of oil off limits. * Congress dictates the types of gasoline that Americans burn, mandating 57 different gas blends that must be refined with seasonal changeovers. "The rhetoric coming from Congress shows a naïveté about energy markets and a blatant disregard for their own role in causing high prices," says Burnett. Further, by limiting domestic supply opportunities, Congress has required that oil companies, and therefore pump prices, are reliant on oil from foreign countries sold on the world market, rather than their own domestic reserves. Source: "Congressional Criticism Misses Mark on Gas Prices," Earthtimes.org, May 11, 2007. For text: Congressional Criticism Misses Mark on Gas Prices
__________________
The Constitution isn't perfect, but it's better than the system we're using now. |
|
||||
|
Re: The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply
Quote:
Oh those damn Democrats.... Wait, hasn't the per gallon price of gas just gone up about $2.00 under the current Republican administration? If we could just get the price of gas down to pre-Bush figures, we would be doing terriffic. I was unaware that the Democratic-Majority was "vaunted". Haven't you seen the polls?
__________________
![]() Congratulations President-Elect Obama |
|
|||
|
Re: The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply
Stephen Colbert says the Chinese have been charging us too much even like a pair of socks for example.So We should stop trading with china and look elsewhere.
|
|
|||
|
Re: The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply
steveox please get a clue. Colbert is satire. He says the opposite of the truth.
|
|
||||
|
Re: The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply
States with access to oil reserves: California, Alaska, Texas, Florida. 3/4 of those states have been under the control of Republicans for quite some time. Republicans have had control of Congress for from 1994-2006. So who's fault is it that the Republicans did nothing to ease restrictions on the enviornment controls? It's the enviornmentalists fault of course
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush "I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006 "[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004 |
|
|||
|
Re: The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply
Quote:
If the US did have reserves in enough quantity it could produce at market competitive rates to substantially reduce imported oil dependency, environmental concerns would be no more than a minor irritant to oil companies regardless of which segment of our one-party political system was in office. |
|
||||
|
Re: The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply
Quote:
__________________
In case you were wondering, yes, there really ARE more idiots these days....technology has made natural selection obsolete. |
|
||||
|
Re: The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply
Someone recently sent this to me via email.
Quote:
__________________
![]() "Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Chardonnay in one hand - chocolate in the other - body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, What a Ride!" |
|
||||
|
Re: The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply
Quote:
Since then, no new refineries have been built, but existing refineries have been razed. No one has even applied to build a new refinery. Question: Why would a monopoly spend the money to build a new refinery, only to have it bring down the refining margin? The free market only works when it exists, there is no free market in oil, it's an oligopoly that is extracting huge profits by virtue of it's stranglehold on the market. BTW, what are the oil companies doing with the huge profits that they have been making lately, investing in new refineries, searching for more oil? NO They are doing stock buybacks, to drive up the stock and create huge profits for the executives with stock options. I hope that despite the huge contributions the industry makes to politicians, congress does something to reign this in.
__________________
“ The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state.” Adam Smith , The Wealth of Nations 1776 "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics" FDR's second Inaugural Address |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|