Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Economic Issues

Economic Issues Business, Commerce, Consumer Affairs, Economics, Public Finance, Trade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2007
Little-Acorn's Avatar
Little-Acorn Little-Acorn is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,422

United_States    
The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply

This has been going on since the 1960s. If the vaunted Democrat-majority congress wants to "make real changes" as they kept claiming during their campaigns, here's a good place to start. But are they trying?

So far, I've seen nothing from them in this area, except for attempts to make us drive less, and/or drive smaller, lighter, more dangerous cars.

Even that cloud has a silver lining, though. If they keep this up, gas prices will rise so high that it will become economically practical to start developing alternate technology that has bee priced out of the market so far.

-------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL CRITICISM MISSES MARK ON GAS PRICES

As gas prices pass $3.00 a gallon, several members of Congress have taken aim once again at oil companies, promoting everything from a windfall profits tax to breaking the companies up. Yet rather than attacking "big oil," Congress should look in the mirror, says H. Sterling Burnett, senior fellow with the National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA).

The real problem is that while energy prices are subject to the basic economic laws of supply and demand, Congress continually restricts supply, says Burnett. For instance:

* Congress chose not to lift the moratorium on new oil and gas
production on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf, putting more
than 85 billion barrels of oil (quadruple current U.S.
reserves) off limits.

* Congress has repeatedly refused to allow oil development in
the coastal plains of Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR),
putting 16 billion barrels of oil off limits.

* Congress dictates the types of gasoline that Americans burn,
mandating 57 different gas blends that must be refined with
seasonal changeovers.

"The rhetoric coming from Congress shows a naïveté about energy markets and a blatant disregard for their own role in causing high prices," says Burnett. Further, by limiting domestic supply opportunities, Congress has required that oil companies, and therefore pump prices, are reliant on oil from foreign countries sold on the world market, rather than their own domestic reserves.

Source: "Congressional Criticism Misses Mark on Gas Prices," Earthtimes.org, May 11, 2007.

For text:

Congressional Criticism Misses Mark on Gas Prices
__________________
The Constitution isn't perfect, but it's better than the system we're using now.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2007
pramjockey's Avatar
pramjockey pramjockey is offline
OMG!
Scruffy-looking nerf herder

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 14,157

Scotland     Colorado

Re: The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply

Except, of course, that the problem isn't oil supply, but refining capacity.
__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2007
TheLastBoyScout's Avatar
TheLastBoyScout TheLastBoyScout is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 4,505

United_States    
Re: The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply

Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
This has been going on since the 1960s. If the vaunted Democrat-majority congress wants to "make real changes" as they kept claiming during their campaigns, here's a good place to start. But are they trying?
Isn't refining capacity the main variable in the current gas price jumps? I thought that was the bottleneck and that was purely in the hands of the oil companies and not our government. Perhaps the government needs to mandate a certain level of refining capacity so that there won't be false shortages.

Oh those damn Democrats.... Wait, hasn't the per gallon price of gas just gone up about $2.00 under the current Republican administration?

If we could just get the price of gas down to pre-Bush figures, we would be doing terriffic.

I was unaware that the Democratic-Majority was "vaunted". Haven't you seen the polls?
__________________

Congratulations President-Elect Obama
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2007
steveox steveox is offline
Permanently Banned

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Way Way Down South
Posts: 2,621

United_States     Mississippi

Re: The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply

Stephen Colbert says the Chinese have been charging us too much even like a pair of socks for example.So We should stop trading with china and look elsewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2007
ViolaLee ViolaLee is offline
County Executive
We are the ones we've been waiting for.

 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 382

United_States     California

Re: The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply

Quote:
Originally Posted by steveox View Post
Stephen Colbert says the Chinese have been charging us too much even like a pair of socks for example.So We should stop trading with china and look elsewhere.
steveox please get a clue. Colbert is satire. He says the opposite of the truth.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2007
AjaxPress's Avatar
AjaxPress AjaxPress is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 4,470

United_States     Ethiopia

Re: The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply

States with access to oil reserves: California, Alaska, Texas, Florida. 3/4 of those states have been under the control of Republicans for quite some time. Republicans have had control of Congress for from 1994-2006. So who's fault is it that the Republicans did nothing to ease restrictions on the enviornment controls? It's the enviornmentalists fault of course
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2007
Americano Americano is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 5,661

   
Re: The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply

Quote:
Originally Posted by AjaxPress View Post
States with access to oil reserves: California, Alaska, Texas, Florida. 3/4 of those states have been under the control of Republicans for quite some time. Republicans have had control of Congress for from 1994-2006. So who's fault is it that the Republicans did nothing to ease restrictions on the enviornment controls? It's the enviornmentalists fault of course
There aren't enough US oil reserves to make even a small dent in imported oil. Refining issues aside, the US produces about 8.7mb/day from 10,000 oil wells at high production costs for around 40% of our consumption requirements. In contrast, the Sauds produce about 10.4mb/day from 1,000 oil wells for about $5/barrel.

If the US did have reserves in enough quantity it could produce at market competitive rates to substantially reduce imported oil dependency, environmental concerns would be no more than a minor irritant to oil companies regardless of which segment of our one-party political system was in office.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2007
EricOKC's Avatar
EricOKC EricOKC is offline
Vice President
The one your parents warned you about

 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,618

Texas     United_States

Re: The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply

Quote:
Originally Posted by Americano View Post
There aren't enough US oil reserves to make even a small dent in imported oil. Refining issues aside, the US produces about 8.7mb/day from 10,000 oil wells at high production costs for around 40% of our consumption requirements. In contrast, the Sauds produce about 10.4mb/day from 1,000 oil wells for about $5/barrel.

If the US did have reserves in enough quantity it could produce at market competitive rates to substantially reduce imported oil dependency, environmental concerns would be no more than a minor irritant to oil companies regardless of which segment of our one-party political system was in office.
Question: Why are our production costs so high? Could it perhaps be related to environmental regulatory compliance? Nah - that couldn't POSSIBLY be it....
__________________
In case you were wondering, yes, there really ARE more idiots these days....technology has made natural selection obsolete.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2007
Mrs. M's Avatar
Mrs. M Mrs. M is offline
Parrothead
What if the hokey-pokey is all it really is about?

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,991

United_States     Louisiana

Re: The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply

Someone recently sent this to me via email.

Quote:
Getting Hosed
By Bill O'Reilly for BillOReilly.com
Thursday, May 10, 2007

Every time you gas up your vehicle and that hose locks into the tank, you,
American person, are getting hosed. The energy scam we are presently
experiencing is one smooth operation. This time the Arabs aren't raising
prices on barrels of oil. This time it's not saber-rattling from Iran that is
driving up the price of gas. No, this time the problems are in Whiting,
Indiana and Norco, Louisiana.

There are oil refineries in both those towns, and they've had a few annoying
problems. A little power outage here, a small fire there. And whenever the
speculators hear of any problem in an American refinery, they bid the price of
oil up. The oil companies see that and immediately tell your gas station guy
to charge more.

There has not been a new oil refinery built in the United States since 1976.
Conservatives say the environmental people are blocking construction. There is some truth to that, but the biggest problem in building more refineries is
money. Big oil doesn't want to spend billions on a new facility because they
are making record profits now, and alternative energies may be coming. The oil barons love the slow-downs in Whiting and Norco, especially when they occur at the start of the summer driving season. Let the profit party begin.

The free marketers hate me for telling you all this. They say it's a "supply
and demand" issue. Sure. If you stifle the amount of gasoline refined when
everybody wants to drive, yeah, that price is gonna go up. But is that a "free
market?"

You, yourself, cannot get into the oil "bidness." It takes all kinds of
government approvals every step of the way to market gas and oil. Believe
me, "Lenny's One Stop Energy Emporium" is not going to happen. Subway is not going to be franchising oil refineries anytime soon.

It is beyond frightening that both Democratic and Republican administrations
have not insisted more oil refineries be built. We, as a country, are totally
dependent on gas and oil, and the economy will collapse if America doesn't
have enough of these commodities. But the government has good reason not to impede oil prices: Taxes. The more you pay at the pump, the more money rolls into DC.

But, again, no refineries have been built in 31 years, while demand has
increased about 31%, one percent a year.

Appeals for Americans to conserve energy are swell, but they won't work. We
are an immediate gratification society. We want what we want, and if it's a
Hummer, blank you if you don't like it.

The only way a catastrophe can be headed off is for Congress to get serious
with the oil companies and demand they upgrade and expand refining capacity, and play fair on prices. If Congress does not do that, major pain is coming for America.

Besides terrorism, the energy squeeze is the story of our times. Remember, you read it here.
Louisiana produces about 30% of the nation's crude (see, we ARE important to the nation!). Last May, Valero St. Charles Refinery in Norco had a fire, Murphy Oil had to pay out mega bucks in lawsuits after Katrina and who knows what other excuses they use to raise gas prices. I'm still paying about $2.76/gallon, though it's been as high as $2.89 in recent months and I think it's disgusting that we're getting raped at the pumps.
__________________


"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Chardonnay in one hand - chocolate in the other - body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, What a Ride!"
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2007
goober's Avatar
goober goober is offline
President

 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 10,329

   
Re: The problem with gas prices: Congress restricts supply

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricOKC View Post
Question: Why are our production costs so high? Could it perhaps be related to environmental regulatory compliance? Nah - that couldn't POSSIBLY be it....
We had substantially more refining capacity in 1980 than we do today.

Since then, no new refineries have been built, but existing refineries have been razed.

No one has even applied to build a new refinery.

Question: Why would a monopoly spend the money to build a new refinery, only to have it bring down the refining margin?

The free market only works when it exists, there is no free market in oil, it's an oligopoly that is extracting huge profits by virtue of it's stranglehold on the market.

BTW, what are the oil companies doing with the huge profits that they have been making lately, investing in new refineries, searching for more oil? NO
They are doing stock buybacks, to drive up the stock and create huge profits for the executives with stock options.

I hope that despite the huge contributions the industry makes to politicians, congress does something to reign this in.
__________________
“ The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state.”

Adam Smith , The Wealth of Nations 1776

"We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics"
FDR's second Inaugural Address
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online