Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Economic Issues

Economic Issues Business, Commerce, Consumer Affairs, Economics, Public Finance, Trade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,970

   
Re: minimum conditions for workers in the US?

Quote:
Originally Posted by danielpalos View Post
I don't think anyone should not be rewarded for working hard either. However, if we are going to maintain a safety net, why not reward couch potatoes, at rock bottom cost; a hypothetical minimum wage, that pays people to not produce labor input to the economy; as a form of competition between the public and private sectors?

I don't think of it as rewarding lazy people, but as promoting and providing for the general Welfare, in a manner that can also provide and promote efficiency gains in our economy.
This is actually pretty fucking simple:

Work hard, and you might be rewarded. Reward is never, and should never, be guaranteed.

Be a lazy fuck, and you get nothing.

That pretty much sums it up...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2007
JHC's Avatar
JHC JHC is offline
President
a cold, cold woman... and junebug sympathizer

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Florida US
Posts: 10,538

United_States     Wyoming

Re: minimum conditions for workers in the US?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
This is actually pretty fucking simple:

Work hard, and you might be rewarded. Reward is never, and should never, be guaranteed.

Be a lazy fuck, and you get nothing.

That pretty much sums it up...
Are you sure?
When you interview for a job, do you not discuss reward for your services before you accept an offer?

I thought you'd probably applied for at least one job that paid greater than minimum wage but perhaps I'm mistaken.
__________________
...the government...is caving in...with their specious arguments couched in the...language of civil rights law, and that the churches ... likewise crumbling to...rhetoric which is nothing but heretical sophistry -- ~F Phelps
Platitudes like the one you offer are no different - and no less incorrect - than the jackass part-time Christian who says, "I'm going to heaven because I'm nice to people." It so misses the point.~Impugn
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,970

   
Re: minimum conditions for workers in the US?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JHC View Post
Are you sure?
Quite...

Quote:
When you interview for a job, do you not discuss reward for your services before you accept an offer?
No, I do not discuss "reward", I discuss "compensation", which is what I'm paid if I perform to the minimum standards of my employer. My "reward" (in the form of a bonus) is paid as the result of working hard and expending more effort and energy than I have to...

Quote:
I thought you'd probably applied for at least one job that paid greater than minimum wage but perhaps I'm mistaken.
You're quite the "baiter" today, aren't you? You're so good at it. You must be a Master-Bait... nevermind.

And I haven't had a minimum wage job since 1979, when I was 17...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2007
JHC's Avatar
JHC JHC is offline
President
a cold, cold woman... and junebug sympathizer

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Florida US
Posts: 10,538

United_States     Wyoming

Re: minimum conditions for workers in the US?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Quite...



No, I do not discuss "reward", I discuss "compensation", which is what I'm paid if I perform to the minimum standards of my employer.
Ohhhhhhhhhh. I see. This is different from what Daisym was talking about. Wait, no it wasn't.
Quote:
My "reward" (in the form of a bonus) is paid as the result of working hard and expending more effort and energy than I have to...
Well thats not at all what danielpalos was talking about when HE said "reward"! Nor was it part of Daisym's post/position/argument...

Quote:
You're quite the "baiter" today, aren't you? You're so good at it. You must be a Master-Bait... nevermind.
Nay, there is one greater than I. Master Steve taught me everything I know.

Quote:
And I haven't had a minimum wage job since 1979, when I was 17...
Thank you for clearing that up. I'm sure you can see why I thought differently.
__________________
...the government...is caving in...with their specious arguments couched in the...language of civil rights law, and that the churches ... likewise crumbling to...rhetoric which is nothing but heretical sophistry -- ~F Phelps
Platitudes like the one you offer are no different - and no less incorrect - than the jackass part-time Christian who says, "I'm going to heaven because I'm nice to people." It so misses the point.~Impugn
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2007
daisym daisym is offline
Vice President

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,550

   
Re: minimum conditions for workers in the US?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve


Or maybe it means you should get out from behind that menial "would you like fried with that" hourly job, get an education, and get yourself a salaried job which permits you greater latitude to enjoy your free time.

I'm on salary. I do a good deal of my work from home. If I decide not to work at all one day, I can do that. If I decide that I can work 18 hours one day, I can do that, too. My employer has no problem with it one way or the other.

Seriously, you just hit the bottom of the barrel with regards to being pathetic...
AS it was you who introduced totally unfounded accusations of my 'laziness', I hardly think you're in a position to rebut my argument this way.

In addition, if you worked for MY organisation, and you were obviously spending so much of your paid time on non work activities, I would be speaking to your manager about staffing levels in his department.

As far as I'm concerned, when you work in industry you are there to work for your employer, not to entertain yourself. Of course there are social aspects to employment, however the reason your employer pays you is to work for him.

It seems to me like your department needs some rationalization if you have so much free time.

I would ask your manager to raise this at your next performance review, and discuss whether you need further training, so that you can take on more work since you are obviously underemployed at present.

Alternatively, if there are several people in such a position as yourself, there may be a need to reduce staffing levels in your section.

I believe that when people are at work they should be doing what they are paid to do.
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,970

   
Re: minimum conditions for workers in the US?

Quote:
Originally Posted by daisym View Post
AS it was you who introduced totally unfounded accusations of my 'laziness', I hardly think you're in a position to rebut my argument this way.

In addition, if you worked for MY organisation, and you were obviously spending so much of your paid time on non work activities, I would be speaking to your manager about staffing levels in his department.

As far as I'm concerned, when you work in industry you are there to work for your employer, not to entertain yourself. Of course there are social aspects to employment, however the reason your employer pays you is to work for him.

It seems to me like your department needs some rationalization if you have so much free time.

I would ask your manager to raise this at your next performance review, and discuss whether you need further training, so that you can take on more work since you are obviously underemployed at present.

Alternatively, if there are several people in such a position as yourself, there may be a need to reduce staffing levels in your section.

I believe that when people are at work they should be doing what they are paid to do.
As a salaried employee, I'm often been called on to work weekends, nights (in addition to a regular day), and holidays. I don't have a problem with that.

The trade off is that is that I pretty much write my own schedule. If I don't want to go to the office tomorrow, I don't have to. If I want to go to the office for a few hours and then go golfing, I can do that too, with the blessings of my Supervisor.

Don't pretend like you know anything about my job or my industry, or my work situation. You don't. Pretending that you do makes you look stupid...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2007
danielpalos danielpalos is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: US, California
Posts: 2,976

   
Re: minimum conditions for workers in the US?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
This is actually pretty fucking simple:

Work hard, and you might be rewarded. Reward is never, and should never, be guaranteed.

Be a lazy fuck, and you get nothing.

That pretty much sums it up...
What if I am a lazy fuck of a worker, and still make a good living?
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,970

   
Re: minimum conditions for workers in the US?

Quote:
Originally Posted by danielpalos View Post
What if I am a lazy fuck of a worker, and still make a good living?
Well, you'd still be a lazy fuck.

If you're cool with that, more power to ya'...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2007
Americano Americano is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 5,661

   
Re: minimum conditions for workers in the US?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Quite...



No, I do not discuss "reward", I discuss "compensation", which is what I'm paid if I perform to the minimum standards of my employer. My "reward" (in the form of a bonus) is paid as the result of working hard and expending more effort and energy than I have to...



You're quite the "baiter" today, aren't you? You're so good at it. You must be a Master-Bait... nevermind.

And I haven't had a minimum wage job since 1979, when I was 17...
The 20-years of military service you volunteered for at an enlisted level paid more than graduating from college at 22 and pursing a professional career? Could you have afforded private health care for say the first ten years on your income if the government wasn't picking up the tab? With no government insurance and an inability to pay for health care for your daughter would you have cheered the presidential veto?
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,970

   
Re: minimum conditions for workers in the US?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Americano View Post
The 20-years of military service you volunteered for at an enlisted level paid more than graduating from college at 22 and pursing a professional career?
A college degree does not guarantee one a steady job, much less a "professional" one. There are plenty of waiters in this country with degrees.

But, and this just shows how ignorant your view is, I didn't join the military for the money. Had it paid me $500 a month or $5,000, I would have joined all the same...

Quote:
Could you have afforded private health care for say the first ten years on your income if the government wasn't picking up the tab?
I have no idea. I joined the military six months out of high school. Health care wasn't foremost on my mind. I have no idea what it would've cost me to obtain health insurance back in 1980, so I honestly couldn't say if I could've afforded it or not...

Quote:
With no government insurance and an inability to pay for health care for your daughter would you have cheered the presidential veto?
Yep.

I don't believe anyone should get something for nothing when it comes to prgrams like this. I was raised to work hard for what you want. You, clearly, were a spoiled child who was raised to believe that, if you whine long enough and loud enough, someone will come along and give you what you want, if for no other reason than to get you to shut the fuck up.

I can only speak for myself, but I don't care how long or how hard you whine...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2007
danielpalos danielpalos is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: US, California
Posts: 2,976

   
Re: minimum conditions for workers in the US?

I think first world countries can afford to pay people to be couch potatoes. We already know that third world countries cannot afford to pay people to be couch potatoes.

Why isn't it a matter of national pride, to claim first world status, much as the space race was when we were competing with second world economies
Reply With Quote
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2007
JHC's Avatar
JHC JHC is offline
President
a cold, cold woman... and junebug sympathizer

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Florida US
Posts: 10,538

United_States     Wyoming

Re: minimum conditions for workers in the US?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve toward Daisym View Post
Or maybe it means you should get out from behind that menial "would you like fried with that" hourly job, get an education, and get yourself a salaried job which permits you greater latitude to enjoy your free time.

I'm on salary. I do a good deal of my work from home. If I decide not to work at all one day, I can do that. If I decide that I can work 18 hours one day, I can do that, too. My employer has no problem with it one way or the other.

Seriously, you just hit the bottom of the barrel with regards to being pathetic...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve toward Daisym View Post
As a salaried employee, I'm often been called on to work weekends, nights (in addition to a regular day), and holidays. I don't have a problem with that.

The trade off is that is that I pretty much write my own schedule. If I don't want to go to the office tomorrow, I don't have to. If I want to go to the office for a few hours and then go golfing, I can do that too, with the blessings of my Supervisor.

Don't pretend like you know anything about my job or my industry, or my work situation. You don't. Pretending that you do makes you look stupid...

Such a comedian!
__________________
...the government...is caving in...with their specious arguments couched in the...language of civil rights law, and that the churches ... likewise crumbling to...rhetoric which is nothing but heretical sophistry -- ~F Phelps
Platitudes like the one you offer are no different - and no less incorrect - than the jackass part-time Christian who says, "I'm going to heaven because I'm nice to people." It so misses the point.~Impugn
Reply With Quote
  #73 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2007
JHC's Avatar
JHC JHC is offline
President
a cold, cold woman... and junebug sympathizer

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Florida US
Posts: 10,538

United_States     Wyoming

Re: minimum conditions for workers in the US?

Steve inadvertently brings up a good point and one thats been on my mind for the past decade or so.
The United States GDP has actually been decreasing relative to other nations. All the while, the number of hours worked has been increasing.
Frequently, as I watched this happen - read about it on the internet in books or magazines - I sat at my desk in my employers office building. I could have been home doing this and it would have made no difference. My job is such that I am very, very busy at certain times during the month, and usually very slow at others. On average, I probably really worked about 40 hours but spent a fair bit more time stuck at my desk being non-productive for them or me. It doesn't make sense. I could have done so much more had I been allowed to truly manage my own schedule.
I think this is part of our problem. We still insist on adhering to the 8-5, 40 hr (but really 50 hr) work week, and two weeks vacation. This doesn't fit our globalizing economy where our counterparts may be in Australia or India or Hong Kong, working different hours in a different time zone and different standards.
We're waistful! And it's ludicrous!
__________________
...the government...is caving in...with their specious arguments couched in the...language of civil rights law, and that the churches ... likewise crumbling to...rhetoric which is nothing but heretical sophistry -- ~F Phelps
Platitudes like the one you offer are no different - and no less incorrect - than the jackass part-time Christian who says, "I'm going to heaven because I'm nice to people." It so misses the point.~Impugn
Reply With Quote
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2007
Americano Americano is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 5,661

   
Re: minimum conditions for workers in the US?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JHC View Post
Steve inadvertently brings up a good point and one thats been on my mind for the past decade or so.
The United States GDP has actually been decreasing relative to other nations. All the while, the number of hours worked has been increasing.
Frequently, as I watched this happen - read about it on the internet in books or magazines - I sat at my desk in my employers office building. I could have been home doing this and it would have made no difference. My job is such that I am very, very busy at certain times during the month, and usually very slow at others. On average, I probably really worked about 40 hours but spent a fair bit more time stuck at my desk being non-productive for them or me. It doesn't make sense. I could have done so much more had I been allowed to truly manage my own schedule.
I think this is part of our problem. We still insist on adhering to the 8-5, 40 hr (but really 50 hr) work week, and two weeks vacation. This doesn't fit our globalizing economy where our counterparts may be in Australia or India or Hong Kong, working different hours in a different time zone and different standards.
We're waistful! And it's ludicrous!
While you may be a self-motivated employee capable of managing your own schedule and performing your duties without supervision that's not considered a normal circumstance in the general business world. The majority of workers require a structured environment including line supervision and personal interaction with their co-workers (the worn-out but applicable 'team' aspect of a workplace) to produce their best efforts, even in professional fields.

As to global communication requirements with different time zones, in one form or another that's always been in place. Even before the PC age every financial department of any size with global interests always had a rotation of people providing 24-hour coverage of ticker tape, FAX and telephone monitoring as money has always moved outside normal business hours in the overnight markets. Manufacturing of products requiring raw materials requires 24/7/365 monitoring and communications to ensure on-time delivery of those materials and finished components to facilitate factory scheduling as ships, rail and trucking don't adhere to regular schedules. I could go on and on with 24/7/365 business requirements but my point is that in most cases different time zone requirements have, since electronic communication was developed, always been accommodated as required.

What I fail to understand is how many employees find time to use the Internet for personal purposes such as contributing to this forum during work hours. While it's understood that peddlers, customer service and other such unsupervised employees who travel will always make time for their personal requirements, how do people in an office structure make time to use the net for personal purposes? I'd have to think that's simply poor line supervision derived from lax management.
Reply With Quote
  #75 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,970

   
Re: minimum conditions for workers in the US?

Quote:
Originally Posted by danielpalos View Post
I think first world countries can afford to pay people to be couch potatoes.
Sure, we can afford it. We just don't want to give you free money...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
Reply