Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Economic Issues

Economic Issues Business, Commerce, Consumer Affairs, Economics, Public Finance, Trade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,637

United_States    
Re: Putting Sales Tax VS Income Tax argument to bed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgerufus View Post
What I don't understand is why a lower tax has to create more jobs.

I can see how it could but I don't think it really has to work that way at all. Where is all this growth coming from ? Who is financing it ? What demand will it satisfy, all because existing business is paying less tax - maybe they just take more profit and invest it in china ? I am sceptical.
The cost of doing business is lower, investment is no longer taxed, and businesses can compete with foreign products better. Its not neccesarily a lower tax, but a removal of tax on production. Its cheaper to order products overseas and sell here, than it is to produce here and sell here. That changes under the fair tax.

http://www.fairtax.org/PDF/FairTax_o...ufacturing.pdf
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #77 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,637

United_States    
Re: Putting Sales Tax VS Income Tax argument to bed

Quote:
Originally Posted by lostinacause View Post
Lower tax means that people keep a higher portion of additional income. The marginal benefit of working increases hence the demand for labour increases. This causes employment to increase. By the same token it would hamper employment of low income individuals because they are taxed at a nonzero rate under the "Fair Tax".
Just the opposite it would empower low income individuals as they now have an removal of the penatly to work, save, and invest.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #78 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008
lostinacause lostinacause is offline
Governor

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: In transition
Posts: 499

Canada    
Re: Putting Sales Tax VS Income Tax argument to bed

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Just the opposite it would empower low income individuals as they now have an removal of the penatly to work, save, and invest.
If the marginal tax rate is lower then 23% there incentive to work would go down. Investments would also be less attractive because they too would be taxed at a non-trivial rate.
Reply With Quote
  #79 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2008
Marcus1124 Marcus1124 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 5,116

   
Re: Putting Sales Tax VS Income Tax argument to bed

Most conservatives and sensible economists recognize that either the flat tax or the fair tax would be vastly better for our economy than the current idiotic tax code. And most even recognize that consuption-based taxes such as the fair tax are superior to taxes on income and investment.

The objections and opposition are largely based on logistical and practical implementation concerns and (such as the aforementioned threat of the income tax creeping back over the years in ADDITION to the national sales tax).

I think what we need is an intermediate step to demonstrate the economic power that would be unleashed by shifting to a consumption based taxation system. We need to have a five year plan which steadily reduces income tax rates with steadily inceasing national sales tax rates until we have a relatively low flat income tax rate, and a relatively low national sales tax on all retail goods and services.

It is not is not ideal, but it is far superior to the current mess.
__________________
"It's a good feeling to shoot a bad guy. Something you democrats would never understand. Americans are homesteaders, we want a safe home, keep the money we make, and shoot bad guys!"

----Denny Crane

Reply With Quote
  #80 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2008
skeptic1 skeptic1 is offline
U.S. Senator
Incrementally from Smiley to Big Bad Bill to Sweet William :)

 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: south west usa
Posts: 736
Blog Entries: 34

United_States     Texas

Re: Putting Sales Tax VS Income Tax argument to bed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus1124 View Post
Most conservatives and sensible economists recognize that either the flat tax or the fair tax would be vastly better for our economy than the current idiotic tax code. And most even recognize that consuption-based taxes such as the fair tax are superior to taxes on income and investment.
Most conservatives ?

Most "sensible" economists ?

Vastly better ?

Could you please present facts that support your suppositions.

No wonder I am "Skepical"

IMO our economic problems are not caused by taxation but by the inability to control inflation and provide adequate life sustaining jobs (in our country) for a growing population VS diminishing resources and the transfer of transforming raw mateials into finished goods to far away places by workers paid minuscule wages.
Reply With Quote
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2008
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,637

United_States    
Re: Putting Sales Tax VS Income Tax argument to bed

Quote:
Originally Posted by skeptic1 View Post
Most conservatives ?

Most "sensible" economists ?

Vastly better ?

Could you please present facts that support your suppositions.

No wonder I am "Skepical"

IMO our economic problems are not caused by taxation but by the inability to control inflation and provide adequate life sustaining jobs (in our country) for a growing population VS diminishing resources and the transfer of transforming raw mateials into finished goods to far away places by workers paid minuscule wages.
You can read the latest economic research paper here:

http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServ...about_BHI_0607


Quote:
GDP is estimated to be 7.9 percent higher in the first year, 10.9% higher in year 10 and 10.3% higher in year 25 after enactment of the FairTax than what would otherwise be the case if the current system remained in place.
Domestic investment is 74.5% higher, 75.9% higher, and 65.2% higher in years 1, 10, and 25, respectively.
The capital stock is 9.3% higher in year 5, 14.1% higher in year 10, and 17.3% higher in year 25.
Real wages are 10.3%, 9.5%, and 9.2% higher in years 1, 10, and 25, respectively than would otherwise be the case.
Consumption drops slightly in the first two years (0.6% and 0.8%), and then be 1.8% higher in year 5, 4.3% higher in year 10, and 6.0% higher in year 25.
Quote:
BEACON HILL INSTITUTE
BHI is the research arm of the Department of Economics at Suffolk University in Boston. It specializes in the development of state-of-the-art economic and statistical models for the analysis of federal, state, and local economic policies and how they affect citizens and businesses. Dr. David G. Tuerck, director of the research team, serves as the Director of Beacon Hill Institute and as professor and chairman of the Suffolk University Department of Economics. Formerly, he directed the Economic Analysis Group at Coopers & Lybrand, Washington, D.C. and the Center for Research and Advertising at the American Enterprise Institute.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #82 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2008
Marcus1124 Marcus1124 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 5,116

   
Re: Putting Sales Tax VS Income Tax argument to bed

Quote:
skeptic1
IMO our economic problems are not caused by taxation but by the inability to control inflation and provide adequate life sustaining jobs (in our country) for a growing population VS diminishing resources and the transfer of transforming raw mateials into finished goods to far away places by workers paid minuscule wages.
Inability to control inflation? Inability to provide life sustaining jobs? Talk about utter nonesense with NO basis in reality.

In terms of REAL inflation (monetary rather than changes in certain prices as a result of supply and demand pressures) inflation, while having mildly upticked over the last three years) is still rather mild by any and all historic measures.

Unemployment is near historic lows, below the 30 year average, and at a level which 15 years ago was considered "full".

People who are living in poverty are doing so because of THEIR OWN choices in life which has left them ill-prepared to take advantage of the abundance of opportunity this country provides. It is a simple matter of fact that (as George Will continuously points out), there are three things that every single person in this country has direct control over in their lives that all but guarantees they will not live in sustained poverty:

1. Don't have children until you are married
2. Don't get married until you have a high school education
3. Get a highschool education

Add to that, don't become a substance abuser and you have basically accounted for 99.9% over those living in chronic poverty.

So, stop bitching and whinning about this or that not being "provided". This country provides the single best and most important thing that an economy can and should "provide" to people...opportunity. It is the indidual's responsibility to take advantage of that undeniable abundance of opportunity.
__________________
"It's a good feeling to shoot a bad guy. Something you democrats would never understand. Americans are homesteaders, we want a safe home, keep the money we make, and shoot bad guys!"

----Denny Crane

Reply With Quote
  #83 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2008
skeptic1 skeptic1 is offline
U.S. Senator
Incrementally from Smiley to Big Bad Bill to Sweet William :)

 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: south west usa
Posts: 736
Blog Entries: 34

United_States     Texas

Re: Putting Sales Tax VS Income Tax argument to bed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus1124 View Post
Inability to control inflation? Inability to provide life sustaining jobs? Talk about utter nonesense with NO basis in reality.Inability to control inflation? Inability to provide life sustaining jobs? Talk about utter nonesense with NO basis in reality.

[quote=Marcus1124;1143299]"Unemployment is near historic lows, below the 30 year average, and at a level which 15 years ago was considered "full".

The answer: ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus1124 View Post
1. Don't have children until you are married
2. Don't get married until you have a high school education
3. Get a highschool education
Rome burns and Nwero fiddles !
Reply With Quote
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2008
Marcus1124 Marcus1124 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 5,116

   
Re: Putting Sales Tax VS Income Tax argument to bed

[quote]skeptic1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus1124 View Post
"Unemployment is near historic lows, below the 30 year average, and at a level which 15 years ago was considered "full".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus1124 View Post

The answer: ?

Quote:
Skeptic1
Rome burns and Nwero fiddles !
Wow, such thoughtful and intelligent answers, totally devoid of any substance or facts.

Well, the FACT is that unemployment IS below the thirty year average (a thirty year period which has seen unparalled growth, wealth, and prosperity in this country), and stands at a level that used to be roundly considered "full" employment. True monetary inflation is at a rather reasonable rate (below 2%).

And as for Nero fiddling, would you care to show some data supporting your dismisal of my analysis? What percentage of married highschool graduates with children live in poverty in this country? If you don't know, then you have no rational basis to dismiss the observation.
__________________
"It's a good feeling to shoot a bad guy. Something you democrats would never understand. Americans are homesteaders, we want a safe home, keep the money we make, and shoot bad guys!"

----Denny Crane

Reply With Quote
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2008
AkDiesel's Avatar
AkDiesel AkDiesel is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: USA-Alaska
Posts: 2,282

United_States     Alaska

Re: Putting Sales Tax VS Income Tax argument to bed

Let us not forget the other reason that the Fair Tax or Flat Tax will not be put in place with in this country is "The end of Class warfare."
As it is now the political machine can tell the people of the country that they and only they will go after the very rich and make them pay not only their share but more. And then make deals with the very rich to make sure that they(rich) get the breaks with in the tax codes.
As it is today each and every one of us can use the codes , that is if we have the time or money to pay some one to find them , to put them to work for us.
What is fair about the system today? not one thing.
What is wrong with each and every one of us paying the same %rate on a sales tax? The more that you spend on new items the more you pay, but each is paying the same %.

The line that the rich need to pay is just wrong with this country when we say with the other side of the mouth that if you work hard and save you too could be rich.

I like people that have money, as they have the money to spend.
__________________
Fear the Government
Reply With Quote
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2008
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,637

United_States    
Re: Putting Sales Tax VS Income Tax argument to bed

Quote:
Originally Posted by AkDiesel View Post
Let us not forget the other reason that the Fair Tax or Flat Tax will not be put in place with in this country is "The end of Class warfare."
As it is now the political machine can tell the people of the country that they and only they will go after the very rich and make them pay not only their share but more. And then make deals with the very rich to make sure that they(rich) get the breaks with in the tax codes.
As it is today each and every one of us can use the codes , that is if we have the time or money to pay some one to find them , to put them to work for us.
What is fair about the system today? not one thing.
What is wrong with each and every one of us paying the same %rate on a sales tax? The more that you spend on new items the more you pay, but each is paying the same %.

The line that the rich need to pay is just wrong with this country when we say with the other side of the mouth that if you work hard and save you too could be rich.

I like people that have money, as they have the money to spend.
Quite right, which is why we have to educate people and remove polticians. We are getting there. We have never had as many congressman supporting the Fair Tax, or so many candidates for all offices supporting it. Books on it are bestsellers, books on Taxes!
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2008
lostinacause lostinacause is offline
Governor

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: In transition
Posts: 499

Canada    
Re: Putting Sales Tax VS Income Tax argument to bed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus1124 View Post
Most conservatives and sensible economists recognize that either the flat tax or the fair tax would be vastly better for our economy than the current idiotic tax code. And most even recognize that consuption-based taxes such as the fair tax are superior to taxes on income and investment.
Actually consumption-based taxes have similar properties to income based taxes when they are paired accordingly. For example it is easy to consider a income tax that would cause individuals to face the same incentives as a they would under the "fair tax". Income would be taxed at an identical rate and then there would have to be an investment subsidy. In fact, though it would be a difficult task, you could mimic the current tax system using a consumption tax and a series of subsidies.

Quote:
I think what we need is an intermediate step to demonstrate the economic power that would be unleashed by shifting to a consumption based taxation system. We need to have a five year plan which steadily reduces income tax rates with steadily inceasing national sales tax rates until we have a relatively low flat income tax rate, and a relatively low national sales tax on all retail goods and services.
If it is to be done, staging it is the best way to do it. It gives people a chance to see whether it actually works and allows for implementation problems to be addressed without serious consequences..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online