Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Economic Issues

Economic Issues Business, Commerce, Consumer Affairs, Economics, Public Finance, Trade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-28-2008
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,660

United_States    
A Unique Idea on Controlling Gas Prices

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/28/op...hp&oref=slogin

Quote:
No, our mythical candidate would say the long-term answer is to go exactly the other way: guarantee people a high price of gasoline — forever.

This candidate would note that $4-a-gallon gasoline is really starting to impact driving behavior and buying behavior in way that $3-a-gallon gas did not. The first time we got such a strong price signal, after the 1973 oil shock, we responded as a country by demanding and producing more fuel-efficient cars. But as soon as oil prices started falling in the late 1980s and early 1990s, we let Detroit get us readdicted to gas guzzlers, and the price steadily crept back up to where it is today.

We must not make that mistake again. Therefore, what our mythical candidate would be proposing, argues the energy economist Philip Verleger Jr., is a “price floor” for gasoline: $4 a gallon for regular unleaded, which is still half the going rate in Europe today. Washington would declare that it would never let the price fall below that level. If it does, it would increase the federal gasoline tax on a monthly basis to make up the difference between the pump price and the market price.

To ease the burden on the less well-off, “anyone earning under $80,000 a year would be compensated with a reduction in the payroll taxes,” said Verleger. Or, he suggested, the government could use the gasoline tax to buy back gas guzzlers from the public and “crush them.”
The flaws are of course obvious. Federal Govt is not responsible for controlling gas prices or setting energy policy. There is nothing wrong with car makers making money, nor with people driving gas guzzlers. And of course he threw in the class warfare, exempting low income earners from govt policies that hurt everyone. Basically, they guy drives a hybrid, and trades it in every few years. That should be enough to see where he is coming from. Smelling his own farts.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-28-2008
sbskeeper sbskeeper is offline
Citizen

 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: Gainesville, Ga
Posts: 1

United_States     Germany

Re: A Unique Idea on Controlling Gas Prices

I agree. It sounds pretty ridiculous.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-28-2008
stiffy stiffy is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Gresham, Oregon
Posts: 2,829

United_States     Oregon

Re: A Unique Idea on Controlling Gas Prices

Or, how about we get rid of some of the laws that prevent the expansion of refining capacity? Just throwing it out there.
__________________
Weiner.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2008
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,638

United_States    
Re: A Unique Idea on Controlling Gas Prices

I am watching cavuto argue with a democratic operative- she says congress will artificially cap the oil prices at approx. $2.50, and says they are going to bring it to the floor...Nixon tried this shit, and wham.....they never learn, ever.
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online