Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Economic Issues

Economic Issues Business, Commerce, Consumer Affairs, Economics, Public Finance, Trade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2008
iamwhatiseem's Avatar
iamwhatiseem iamwhatiseem is offline
Moderator
Pays too much in taxes

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 12,588

United_States     Indiana

Re: US Govt takes over two largest financial giants

Quote:
Originally Posted by WharfedaleTiger View Post
Had to be done, sadly shows what happens if a single (okay, two) companys become too powerful. If only somebody had, you know, kept an eye on them and stopped them from becoming this dominant, had realised that free market capitalism dosn't work without strong regulation. This has been building for 15 years through greed and lack of oversight.
There WAS someone supposed to be watching over them..FED, SEC, White House, Congress....however when these two combined made for some of the highest paying lobbyist for BOTH parties...you can do pretty much whatever the frig you want to....as I said our founding fathers just over turned in their graves.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2008
Stapo's Avatar
Stapo Stapo is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 950

Germany     European_Union

Re: US Govt takes over two largest financial giants

Quote:
Originally Posted by WharfedaleTiger View Post
Had to be done, sadly shows what happens if a single (okay, two) companys become too powerful. If only somebody had, you know, kept an eye on them and stopped them from becoming this dominant, had realised that free market capitalism dosn't work without strong regulation. This has been building for 15 years through greed and lack of oversight.
Honestly both "companies" are also prime examples for "social democrats" ideas of helping ordinary folks run havok and become the giant /political/economic failure, which they always will.

In this case it all started with good intentions by politicans decades ago and not with an entrepreneur acting according to the free market.
__________________
"bellum omnium contra omnes; atque in eo bello jus esse omnibus in omnia."
Thomas Hobbes

"Homo Homini Lupus"
Thomas Hobbes
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2008
WharfedaleTiger's Avatar
WharfedaleTiger WharfedaleTiger is online now
U.S. Senator
Social Democrat

 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: Wharfedale/Yorkshire/England
Posts: 796

England     European_Union

Re: US Govt takes over two largest financial giants

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stapo View Post
Honestly both "companies" are also prime examples for "social democrats" ideas of helping ordinary folks run havok and become the giant /political/economic failure, which they always will.

In this case it all started with good intentions by politicans decades ago and not with an entrepreneur acting according to the free market.
Indeed, but did they continue to be owned by the government? When did they go out of control? It may have been started by the government but it hasn't been run by them.

Its no coincidence that since free market ideology took hold, especally monterism, we've had the 3 worst recessions/depressions since the Great Depression. (1978-1983, worsened due to Thatchers 'free market' policies, 1988-1994 and this one if it meets predictions). Keynes wasn't always right and his policies where too statist but he did manage to combat boom and bust, which is what we're back too.
__________________
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. - Voltaire

There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare. - Art of War, Sun-Tzu, Chapter 2, Paragraph 6

"An eye for an eye makes everyone blind"-Gandi
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2008
WharfedaleTiger's Avatar
WharfedaleTiger WharfedaleTiger is online now
U.S. Senator
Social Democrat

 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: Wharfedale/Yorkshire/England
Posts: 796

England     European_Union

Re: US Govt takes over two largest financial giants

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamwhatiseem View Post
There WAS someone supposed to be watching over them..FED, SEC, White House, Congress....however when these two combined made for some of the highest paying lobbyist for BOTH parties...you can do pretty much whatever the frig you want to....as I said our founding fathers just over turned in their graves.
Agreed, the whole system of supervision needs looking at. Theres been a lot of very irresponsable moves by various companys in the last 15 years leading to this that just wern't picked up on... But stronger regulation is also needed.
__________________
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. - Voltaire

There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare. - Art of War, Sun-Tzu, Chapter 2, Paragraph 6

"An eye for an eye makes everyone blind"-Gandi
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2008
pramjockey's Avatar
pramjockey pramjockey is online now
OMG!
Scruffy-looking nerf herder

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 14,188

Scotland     Colorado

Re: US Govt takes over two largest financial giants

My favorite part: the two CEOs walk away with $15M apiece. Fucking brilliant.

I need to become a CEO. I'll just run the company into the ground and walk away with my golden parachute.
__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2008
Michael's Avatar
Michael Michael is offline
City Mayor

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 213

United_States     Indiana

Re: US Govt takes over two largest financial giants

Quote:
Originally Posted by pramjockey View Post
My favorite part: the two CEOs walk away with $15M apiece. Fucking brilliant.

I need to become a CEO. I'll just run the company into the ground and walk away with my golden parachute.
Can you hire me as a lobbyist for your corporation so I can embroil the company in some scandal and get us both rich?
__________________


Cultural insecurities are the foundation of American conservatism.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 09-09-2008
AjaxPress's Avatar
AjaxPress AjaxPress is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 4,485

United_States     Ethiopia

Re: US Govt takes over two largest financial giants

Quote:
Originally Posted by AjaxPress
Small Republican government at it's finest. I think the next step in this giant clusterfuck will be to give the executives of these companies huge retirement packages and replace them with cronies. Let's watch.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pramjockey View Post
My favorite part: the two CEOs walk away with $15M apiece. Fucking brilliant.

I need to become a CEO. I'll just run the company into the ground and walk away with my golden parachute.
Hehehe. I was right in my earlier post with the executives getting a nice retirement package. Stay tuned as the crony appointments come next.


Oh wait they're already here...

From wiki...
Herbert M. Allison.
He served as national finance chairman for U.S. Senator John McCain's 2000 presidential campaign.
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 09-09-2008
John Drake's Avatar
John Drake John Drake is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
My Joint exceeds your Staff

 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: America
Posts: 1,705

   
Re: US Govt takes over two largest financial giants

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard J View Post
Tell me if you agree:
The Federal Reserve lowered interest rates in response to the weakening economy. This made money easy to come by as was the intent. But low interest rates caused home prices to increase which brought in speculators. It also increased bank revenues because banks made fees from loans they made. In order to keep those loan fees coming in, banks lowered standards. They were going to sell the loans to places like FNMA anyway. They also bundled them into collateralized debt obligations (CDO's), and sold them to international banks and money lenders.

Once places like FNMA stopped accepting risky loans, the banks kept them in their own inventory. That is what happened to Indymac Bank. And thanks to Chuck Schumer, they had a run just like the one in the movie I mentioned above.

Now, we have to prop up these large quasi-government lending agencies because they are too big to fail. If they did fail, it would bring on a depression like the 1930's.

RJ
Quote:
Forcibly broken up?

That seems a bit severe, especially since there are people in this world who build corporations up from absolutely nothing. The size and success of their corporations are part of their reward.

The blame for this lies squarely on the shoulders of two entities: The financial institutions which extended mortgages when they knew the people they were lending money to wouldn't be able to pay it back, and the absolute fucking idiots who took out mortgages they wouldn't be able to pay.

I don't agree with the bailout, but blaming Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for this problem is stupid. If the idiots who took out mortgages had actually analyzed their ability to replay the loans, and not taken them, we wouldn't be in this situation...__________________
So lets blame the people who were swindled for being swindled? And this when the swindlers were not only the people entrusted by law with being the ones who tell people whether they were qualified or not but were also the same people who were flat out defrauding them as to the value of their homes and/or the value/nature of their assets.

Goddam. You will do or say ANYTHING to excuse your little tin god, won't you? and please stop trying to say you don't support him when everything you do is aimed at his benefit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Get govt out of it altogether, problem solved. First govt tries to create a program, it fails, then they fix it, that fails. HOw many times do we have to see govt fail at something to stop giving them power?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stapo View Post
Honestly both "companies" are also prime examples for "social democrats" ideas of helping ordinary folks run havok and become the giant /political/economic failure, which they always will.

In this case it all started with good intentions by politicans decades ago and not with an entrepreneur acting according to the free market.
Bullshit, since when are banks able to just pick and choose more or less risky investments without engaging in massive fraud and lawbreaking? Which is exactly what they were doing and the real reason for this crisis. It's not an institutional failure but the consequence of a few of Bush's cronies doing actual big time criminal activities, which I doubt any of them will even get accused of.

Fannie and Freddie were doing fine. It took this passel of crooks less than a decade to ruin our economy utterly and now they're going to lay off the entire thing on the victims

Last edited by John Drake; 09-09-2008 at 10:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 09-09-2008
Norrin Radd Norrin Radd is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: AKRON
Posts: 3,676

   
Re: It was a wonderful life, wasn't it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Drake View Post
Why, because he's right?

Remember the Sopranos? Remember the scheme they did with flipping houses? That's pretty much what happened, only it was the whole subPrime mortgage market, it was done right out in the open, the scammers made billions and they were highly connected Republicans instead of Mafia dons but who can tell the difference anymore?

And now they've been found out you guys want to lay the whole thing off on the victims, letting all the people who were defraunded and swindled get foreclosed on while the con men get off scot free.

And why are you bringing up IAWL? You guys all want to be the bank examiner who's going to arrest Jimmy Stewart, while the Fed is the people who come to bail him out in the end, who you all want to see forbidden to help

(Ive been working on a comedy remake of this for years, one version had Janeane Garofolo as Clarence and Ah-nold as Jimmy Stewart
The people who are getting foreclosed on didn't get scammed, the screwed themselves.

The people who got scammed are those who lost their asses in these stocks.

From 65 dollars LESS than a year ago to .73 cents?

Someone should be going to jail. Actually numerous people should go to jail, but all that would happen is that another well connected person would die from heart failure in prison just like Ken Lay and Jim McDougal did.

Where did all that money go?

IT HAD TO GO SOMEWHERE.

Well I hope the American sheeple continue to support republicans and democrats because this will just continue to happen.

The US economy is being purposely destroyed and the sheeple are too busy arguing over which party is worse to notice.

baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

Go ahead and keep supporting the two traitor parties.

When we hit rock bottom you can look in the mirror and know WHY WE HIT BOTTOM.

Pathetic fucking sheep.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 09-09-2008
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,667

United_States    
Re: US Govt takes over two largest financial giants

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Drake View Post
Bullshit, since when are banks able to just pick and choose more or less risky investments without engaging in massive fraud and lawbreaking? Which is exactly what they were doing and the real reason for this crisis. It's not an institutional failure but the consequence of a few of Bush's cronies doing actual big time criminal activities, which I doubt any of them will even get accused of.

Fannie and Freddie were doing fine. It took this passel of crooks less than a decade to ruin our economy utterly and now they're going to lay off the entire thing on the victims
Where did you get the idea they were Bush's cronies?
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 09-09-2008
iamwhatiseem's Avatar
iamwhatiseem iamwhatiseem is offline
Moderator
Pays too much in taxes

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 12,588

United_States     Indiana

Re: US Govt takes over two largest financial giants

Looks like Lehman Brothers is next...so far today they have lost 43% of their value.
Their books are equally as ugly as F&F........is this the next multi-billion bailout??

I am beside myself this discussion has so few participants...does everyone not realize the magnitude of this?
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 09-09-2008
Marcus1124 Marcus1124 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 5,122

   
Re: US Govt takes over two largest financial giants

Quote:
WharfedaleTiger
Its no coincidence that since free market ideology took hold, especally monterism, we've had the 3 worst recessions/depressions since the Great Depression. (1978-1983, worsened due to Thatchers 'free market' policies, 1988-1994 and this one if it meets predictions). Keynes wasn't always right and his policies where too statist but he did manage to combat boom and bust, which is what we're back too.
Wow, it takes alot to be that completely wrong. Assuming you are talking about the U.K., you STILL don't really have anything near "free markets" compared to the U.S.
__________________
"It's a good feeling to shoot a bad guy. Something you democrats would never understand. Americans are homesteaders, we want a safe home, keep the money we make, and shoot bad guys!"

----Denny Crane

Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 09-09-2008
iamwhatiseem's Avatar
iamwhatiseem iamwhatiseem is offline
Moderator
Pays too much in taxes

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 12,588

United_States     Indiana

Re: US Govt takes over two largest financial giants

Stay on topic guys....this is about the F&F bailouts...this will not be turned into another partisan jib jab thread.
Posts deleted
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008
WharfedaleTiger's Avatar
WharfedaleTiger WharfedaleTiger is online now
U.S. Senator
Social Democrat

 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: Wharfedale/Yorkshire/England
Posts: 796

England     European_Union

Re: US Govt takes over two largest financial giants

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus1124 View Post
Wow, it takes alot to be that completely wrong. Assuming you are talking about the U.K., you STILL don't really have anything near "free markets" compared to the U.S.
It seems you know very little about UK politics mate, compared to 1979 Thatcher and the Tories deregulated massivly, and attempted to create a free market in government as well. It may not be as 'free' as in the US (if this is even an entirly god thing) but comparitivly it was a huge step towards a free market.
__________________
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. - Voltaire

There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare. - Art of War, Sun-Tzu, Chapter 2, Paragraph 6

"An eye for an eye makes everyone blind"-Gandi
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is online now
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 15,073

   
Re: US Govt takes over two largest financial giants

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Drake View Post
So lets blame the people who were swindled for being swindled? And this when the swindlers were not only the people entrusted by law with being the ones who tell people whether they were qualified or not but were also the same people who were flat out defrauding them as to the value of their homes and/or the value/nature of their assets.
Well, they certainly deserve a good portion of the blame, don't they?

When I bought my house, I knew exactly what my mortgage payment would be every month. Armed with that information, my wife and I then had to decide whether or not to buy the house. If it was too high, or if there was a provision that allowed it to go higher than we were comfortable with, we wouldn't have bought the house.

The point is that I was assuming responsibility; the risk, of paying the mortgage, as did those who found themselves in trouble. Why should they, essentially, be let off the hook when they were the ones who decided to take out the mortgage? As bad as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been, I doubt they forced anyone to take out a mortgage.

A friend of mine works in a print shop and plays in a band. He probably makes $35,000.00 a year at the print shop job, and maybe another $15,000.00 a year with the band. He took out a mortgage for $550,000.00. Almost from the word "go" he was having problem making ends meet. He was doing it, but it was tough. Unfortunately, though, the guy's an idiot, as he didn't get out while real estate prices were up. He could've sold the house at a profit. Instead, he opted to "tough it out" ("But my band's getting signed!") in the hopes that things would get better.

Everyone he talked to about it told him to sell the place. Everyone he talked to told him that he was in a prime position to come out on top and make a profit. Everyone told him that he couldn't keep going the way he was. Everyone recommended that he take the money and run.

He didn't. He was stupid.

The bank foreclosed on his home, and he lost it. He now lives in a two bedroom apartment with his wife and two kids, because it's all he can afford. When he tries to blame the lender for "sugar coating it", his friends laugh at him. One of our friends is a mortgage broker, and he was telling him that there was no way he could afford to keep going the way he was. He could see that things were bad, but ignored the red flags going up all around him.

Why should he be "bailed out"? He assumed the responsibility for the mortgage and, when things got bad, he ignored some pretty fuckin' sound advice. He had every chance to do the best thing for him and his family, and he opted not to. He made that choice, not his lender.

If he was "swindled", the only reason for that is he didn't do his homework. He hadn't a clue what he was getting himself into. The sad part is that he could've educated himself pretty easily about adjustable mortgages. He simply refused to do so.

So, he bought this big beautiful home in San Diego, and he gets to look at it every time he drives by it on his way to work. Sorry, but that's his fault, and no one elses...

Quote:
Goddam. You will do or say ANYTHING to excuse your little tin god, won't you? and please stop trying to say you don't support him when everything you do is aimed at his benefit.
"Tin God"?

"Support him"?

Sorry, but I have no idea what the fuck you're talking about...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"

Last edited by Steve; 09-10-2008 at 07:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On