Visit the Archives for U.S. Politics Online -- U.S. Politics Online . net


Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 92

Thread: Bad News for the Party of NO

  1. #46
    EagleTed Guest

    Re: Bad News for the Party of NO

    Quote Originally Posted by AjaxPress View Post
    So what? Once the value of those homes goes down to an appropriate level they'll be filled and the housing market will stabalize. The problem is that Republicans are trying to keep the prices artificially high so that the government can buy these overpriced "toxic assets".
    Exactly how are the Republicans trying to keep prices high? And btw, you and Knute need to get on the same page, as he's reporting the good things Obama is doing to artificially keep home prices up.

    That is right! See what your inamorato did on his watch! That is when the crash occurred (2007) OBut do not worry , O is fixing that now
    Obama unveils $75B mortgage relief plan - Mortgage Mess- msnbc.com
    And this:
    Forbes.com - Magazine Article

  2. #47
    bg85 is offline Secretary of State
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    3,782
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Bad News for the Party of NO

    Quote Originally Posted by daddio View Post
    the useless spsnding is harming job growth as it subtracts money from the pool of capital out there.
    could you explain this for me? how does government spending REDUCE the pool of capital? what do you mean by this?
    "My country is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine

  3. #48
    redrover's Avatar
    redrover is offline U.S. House Representative
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Greece NY
    Posts
    620
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Bad News for the Party of NO

    If the economy turns around, Republicans will mmake even make more money, which means Oh no higher taxes. I always wished I was paying a million a year in taxes, because that would mean I was pulling in a pretty good income. Repubs don't think that way.

  4. #49
    daddio's Avatar
    daddio is offline Vice President
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    the south
    Posts
    8,177
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Bad News for the Party of NO

    Quote Originally Posted by bg85 View Post
    could you explain this for me? how does government spending REDUCE the pool of capital? what do you mean by this?

    where did they get the money ? as we all know, they borrowed it.

    if the government borrows 3/4 of a trillion dollars from those with money to lend, thats 3/4 of a trillion not available for lending to anyone else.

    now if the government haw its own money to lend then it might be q different story. even then, it would have been better to simply give back that money that it took via taxation and return it. then the consumer portion of the economy, you know the part that represents 70 %, wel it could get back to doing what it does.

    see, wasnt that easy to understand ?
    Last edited by daddio; 10-29-2009 at 06:37 PM.
    "Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

    Ayn Rand

  5. #50
    bg85 is offline Secretary of State
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    3,782
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Bad News for the Party of NO

    Quote Originally Posted by daddio View Post
    where did they get the money ? as we all know, they borrowed it.

    if the government borrows 3/4 of a rillion dollars from those with money to lend, thats 3/4 of a trillion not available for lending to anyone else.
    well that's the thing, daddio, no one was lending it out to anyone else.
    "My country is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine

  6. #51
    EagleTed Guest

    Re: Bad News for the Party of NO

    There is amble evidence that government spending has a detrimental effect on the GDP.

    http://www.uspoliticsonline.com/economic-issues/56775-government-stimulus-spending-effect-less-than-1-a.html

    Besides drying up capital, it makes poor investments, and inefficient investments.

  7. #52
    AkDiesel's Avatar
    AkDiesel is offline Speaker of the House
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    USA-Alaska
    Posts
    849
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Bad News for the Party of NO

    Who is this turn around working for?
    Wall Street Boys and Girls?
    The Rich that did not lose much?

    When the average person is asked on the street they are telling a totally different story, or is it they are just to stupid to know better?
    Government Should Fear the People That Voted Them In!!

    New Government=one that the President likes a GOP idea but then the Staff puts that Idea in a very DEEP HOLE.

    Read HR143 get enlightment.

    The Revolution Will not be Televised

    [SIGPIC]off.gif[/SIGPIC]

  8. #53
    daddio's Avatar
    daddio is offline Vice President
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    the south
    Posts
    8,177
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Bad News for the Party of NO

    Quote Originally Posted by bg85 View Post
    well that's the thing, daddio, no one was lending it out to anyone else.

    and why ? because t-bills are safer as a risk.

    moreover, DC made it clear that they would come a-callin.

    so US banks were screwed up and unable to obtain access to this money. but others were not. it was just a matter of time before they started looking elsewhere and not long as those with money cannot just sit on the cash.

    we rather predictably, made life easy for them and dramatically increased our dependence.
    "Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

    Ayn Rand

  9. #54
    daddio's Avatar
    daddio is offline Vice President
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    the south
    Posts
    8,177
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Bad News for the Party of NO

    Quote Originally Posted by AkDiesel View Post
    Who is this turn around working for?
    Wall Street Boys and Girls?
    The Rich that did not lose much?

    When the average person is asked on the street they are telling a totally different story, or is it they are just to stupid to know better?

    what turn around ?
    "Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

    Ayn Rand

  10. #55
    fishjoel's Avatar
    fishjoel is offline Vice President
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Camp Buehring, Kuwait
    Posts
    8,483
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Bad News for the Party of NO

    Quote Originally Posted by AjaxPress View Post
    So what? Once the value of those homes goes down to an appropriate level they'll be filled and the housing market will stabalize. The problem is that Republicans are trying to keep the prices artificially high so that the government can buy these overpriced "toxic assets".
    You could be a little slow. You think it's the Republicans that are trying to keep the prices artificially high? Seriously, do you even know what's going on in this country? The Dems pushed out a bill that gave first time home buyers $8k. That caused more people to buy houses and the influx added to the free $8k down payment causes artificial pricing on the houses.

    *sigh* kids these days.
    "The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." - John Maynard Keynes (admits his philosophy is not viable)

  11. #56
    fishjoel's Avatar
    fishjoel is offline Vice President
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Camp Buehring, Kuwait
    Posts
    8,483
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Bad News for the Party of NO

    Quote Originally Posted by Knute View Post
    I maintain that I am not the gullible one. When I say something I usually source it and try to put it into context while the right just regurgitates the line of shit that Beck and Limbaugh feed them and do not even attribute THAT nonsense to them.
    The irony.
    "The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." - John Maynard Keynes (admits his philosophy is not viable)

  12. #57
    Ernie S.'s Avatar
    Ernie S. is offline Secretary of Defense
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Posts
    2,588
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Bad News for the Party of NO

    Quote Originally Posted by Knute View Post
    I maintain that I am not the gullible one. When I say something I usually source it and try to put it into context while the right just regurgitates the line of shit that Beck and Limbaugh feed them and do not even attribute THAT nonsense to them.

  13. #58
    proUSA Guest

    Re: Bad News for the Party of NO

    Quote Originally Posted by redrover View Post
    If the economy turns around, Republicans will mmake even make more money, which means Oh no higher taxes. I always wished I was paying a million a year in taxes, because that would mean I was pulling in a pretty good income. Repubs don't think that way.
    How about reducing government waste which would reduce taxes also....I see you live in NY as I do.....the taxes we working class pay out is BS, all freaking government waste.

    Poor people forget one important thing....The rich keep the nation going, they invest their money.....Money that gets used for new job growth and etc.

    The more taxes they have to pay in, the less that get invested....it not like they wipe their ass's or smoking all that money....

    so while you may have a chip on your shoulder over rich people, you better think again about how they contribute to this country.

  14. #59
    mabus's Avatar
    mabus is offline Secretary of Defense
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    fawning germany
    Posts
    3,428
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Bad News for the Party of NO

    Quote Originally Posted by daddio View Post
    if the government borrows 3/4 of a trillion dollars from those with money to lend, thats 3/4 of a trillion not available for lending to anyone else.
    Sorry, but you are wrong. For each buck on their accounts, who ever it owns, a bank can borrow nine bucks form the fed - but it hs to give give it away as a loan. Who ever buys this loan after someone else signed that he will repay it, can borrow 8.1 bucks from the fed and give it away as a loan, too. That loan can be sold and the fed will grant a fresh loan of 90% of the previous loans size, as well. If you take this effect to an extreme, with it's .75 trillion loan, the government might actually have enabled loans in dimensions a common handheld calculator might not be able to calculate.

    It's important to know that ALL money circulating was created by debt, that the system needs fresh money or it will collapse horribly, and that debt is the only source of new fresh money. And due to the fact that there is interest on the loans and that the banks have to repay the fed, there is always more debt than money circulating in the system.

    The problem is that with each and every new dollar bill, all dollar bills are worth less. And in every monetary system, there is that amount of X dollar bills which marks the point of no return, the moment when "worth less" becomes "worthless".
    "I'm not pissing on you, dork, I'm just trickling down my wealth on you!"
    -Reagonomics, 101

  15. #60
    AkDiesel's Avatar
    AkDiesel is offline Speaker of the House
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    USA-Alaska
    Posts
    849
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Bad News for the Party of NO

    Quote Originally Posted by Knute View Post
    I maintain that I am not the gullible one. When I say something I usually source it and try to put it into context while the right just regurgitates the line of shit that Beck and Limbaugh feed them and do not even attribute THAT nonsense to them.
    So the question that I must ask, Do you know that Beck and Limbaugh are regurgitating the so called right wing from Listening, Watching? Or are you just regurgitating from the other side what has been said?

    Yes at the start Limbaugh did have some points, but today?

    I have watched a few of the Beck's show and from the ones that I have seen, He has no Love for either the GOP or the DNC.

    I know that I have for the last 15 years really started questioned Both Sides..

    The DNC bought the items for the cake, Then the GOP mixed and baked the Cake , Then the DNC iced the cake,

    To believe that Just one party is to blame for the mess... is to be blind.
    Government Should Fear the People That Voted Them In!!

    New Government=one that the President likes a GOP idea but then the Staff puts that Idea in a very DEEP HOLE.

    Read HR143 get enlightment.

    The Revolution Will not be Televised

    [SIGPIC]off.gif[/SIGPIC]

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Tea Party? Ohh no its the Juice party!
    By CSA in forum The White House
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 05-05-2011, 08:38 AM
  2. Grand Old Party vs. "Tea Party"
    By Steerpike in forum Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections
    Replies: 121
    Last Post: 09-25-2010, 02:39 PM
  3. NBC poll--Tea Party more popular that the Democrat or Republican party.
    By Oreo in forum Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections
    Replies: 374
    Last Post: 02-20-2010, 10:02 AM
  4. Fox news most trusted news channel, says poll
    By bg85 in forum Culture & Media Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-27-2010, 11:05 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •