It seems Mitt has the economics exactly 100% right. He wants to cut liberal government spending to decrease the mal-investments or artificial churning it creates, and, cut taxes so the private sector can create real, sustainable investment and economic growth. In short, liberal spending down and private spending up is the formula for growth.
It's econ 101, but a liberal won't know it.
And I presume you are also very much in favor of Paul's eliminating middle-class subsidized corporate construction in nations other than the US?