283Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With QuoteOh, that's cold...Originally Posted by goober
Project much there goober?
Visit the Archives for U.S. Politics Online -- U.S. Politics Online . net
President
Another post completely devoid of intellectual content.That was done peanut and you ignored it. Unlike leftists diatribes which lend themselves to drive-by insults and emotional manipulation, conservative fiscal policy requires a reasoned argument presented with facts, neither of which are the lefts strong points.
Lame peanut, like so much you present to the forum this is just another rationalization for your own inadequacies and your inability to respond in a reasoned an cogent manner.
Okay peanut, so I am talking over your head and you are unable to rebut anything. All you are capable of doing is making arrogant snide insulting comments, creating straw man arguments, and ridicule anything that does not agree with your ideological ranting. When you got nothing, what else can you fall back on? Bullshit. Big piles of bullshit.
tashi deleks,
M
At least you are consistent.
Last edited by goober; 04-29-2012 at 12:34 PM.
Moderator
Oh, that's cold...
Project much there goober?
President
LOL, the king of intellectual vacuity makes his appearance, in defense of mindless drivel....Oh, that's cold...
Project much there goober?
Tell us, oh you who's avatar is the largest ass on the face of the planet, where is the content in Maha's post?
Moderator
Once again... and only for the record... my avatar is NOT a portrait of goober.
Thanks!
Vice President
If there was content ... it could be defended. All who come to the defense of the practice merely empathize with the drivel. Yet they manage themselves to provide content, wit, and succinctness. They don't use the practice of making posts devoid of substance, but empathize with the fluffed up dogma.
If that was the rational for debate ... we could survive with one liners and intellectual jabs ... never mind an enormous page of one liners and jabs.
Last edited by michael h; 04-29-2012 at 01:13 PM.
“If we open up our borders … we could suppress wages of middle class jobs” – Alan GreenspanWe need to suppress the wage levels of the skilled. We need to suppress wages in comparison to the “lesser skilled ” - Alan Greenspan
Vice President
Open a word document, make a long list of intellectual insults and one line responses. Copy and paste at the appropriate time in debate. For more effect ... copy and paste the whole list, with smilies, giving the appearance of having said something insightful. Close the post with you best intellectual insult and make an appeal to your dogma.
Yours Truly, Substantive Deeebate
“If we open up our borders … we could suppress wages of middle class jobs” – Alan GreenspanWe need to suppress the wage levels of the skilled. We need to suppress wages in comparison to the “lesser skilled ” - Alan Greenspan
Vice President
The great thing about one liners and intellectual jabs in debate ... is they are brief. Everybody needs an outlet for frustration during debate ... and most times this expression is entertaining, given its generally brief ... I appreciate it's entertainment value.
“If we open up our borders … we could suppress wages of middle class jobs” – Alan GreenspanWe need to suppress the wage levels of the skilled. We need to suppress wages in comparison to the “lesser skilled ” - Alan Greenspan
Vice President
Keyword
You should always have an informed opinion, so after I inform you, please feel free to express my opinion...USCitizen
Vice President
I don't care if one liners are unintellectual as long as they are brief. 20 of them in one post is daunting.
“If we open up our borders … we could suppress wages of middle class jobs” – Alan GreenspanWe need to suppress the wage levels of the skilled. We need to suppress wages in comparison to the “lesser skilled ” - Alan Greenspan
Vice President
20 of them in one post deserves a bitch slap.
You should always have an informed opinion, so after I inform you, please feel free to express my opinion...USCitizen
Secretary of Defense
Then as I said before, you miss out on a lot of good information. Your problem is, you are narrow minded on the subject and you don't want to accept that your opinion is not the only one there is. M maybe long winded but he has a better grasp of the situation than you do.
Secretary of Defense
What you call "fluff" is little more than the writer qualifying what he expresses. Sure, if M were more brief it would be easier to read, but his opinions tend to be very good.
Secretary of Defense
Yes (former) and no (latter). MC and SS are PAID for by the individuals getting the benefits. Those benefits are owed.
Secretary of Defense
With this I totally agree.
Secretary of Defense
Over all, liberalization of Free Trade has done a lot of good for the US, and will continue to do so.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks