Happy Feet (Movie.) my foot - Page 3 - U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum

doniston · #31 (**permalink**) 11-21-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank

I saw no reference to Muslims, but I appreciate the courtesy of rebuttal argument.
The conditioning placed in this children’s film is only as accurate as the environmental movement which inspired it’s filming. The size of the oceans dictates in there common existence that over fishing is something you say when your walking off the pier because your tired. Sea world presented in the same manner the L.A. Times portrays Guantanamo Bay detainees “again” is only as accurate as animal rights activists movements trying to program children into thinking zoo’s are bad and you should never go to one.
With just as much accuracy I’m certain.
Ask JHC… He holds the copyrights to movie reference replies…

I have a hunch ('course I may be wrong) that you heard of this originally from Glenn Beck on CNN Headline news. IMHO he shouldn't be on the program, and I never watch him any more.He is too radical even for me. but I did see a teaser about it before I changed channels.

Benjamin · #32 (**permalink**) 11-21-2006

So, what's wrong with kids knowing about global warming? Why must the right-wing version of the story be the only story?

~Ben

proUSA · #33 (**permalink**) 11-21-2006

Damn, I will not bother seeing this one….I mean environmental theories, religious bigots…..I see enough of this crap on TV and on the Web, I sure as hell won’t waste my money for a cartoon of it.

doniston · #34 (**permalink**) 11-21-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benjamin

So, what's wrong with kids knowing about global warming? Why must the right-wing version of the story be the only story?

~Ben

Perhaps the deniors want to brainwash the kids early--- before they learn the truth for themselves.

doniston · #35 (**permalink**) 11-21-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by proUSA

Damn, I will not bother seeing this one….I mean environmental theories, religious bigots…..I see enough of this crap on TV and on the Web, I sure as hell won’t waste my money for a cartoon of it.

HEH HEH, and I didn't see your offering to this issue until I had posted, or I would have been more forceful in opposition to the Disengenousness and biggotry of the OP's (and your) position regarding the matter.

I don't like Gore either, But I give credit where credit is due.

JHC · #36 (**permalink**) 11-21-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by proUSA

Damn, I will not bother seeing this one….I mean environmental theories, religious bigots…..I see enough of this crap on TV and on the Web, I sure as hell won’t waste my money for a cartoon of it.

tee hee...it just occured to me that you pay for TV and internet service and hang out at USPO discussing environmental theories and religious bigots all day.

Maybe your objection is that you don't want to "see" it but you're happy to give your two cents worth OF it. Fair enough.

If your argument is against seeing the perceived "liberal" bent without being allowed to stand up in the theater and give your opinon, you could as easily say so.

proUSA · #37 (**permalink**) 11-21-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by doniston

HEH HEH, and I didn't see your offering to this issue until I had posted, or I would have been more forceful in opposition to the Disengenousness and biggotry of the OP's (and your) position regarding the matter.

I don't like Gore either, But I give credit where credit is due.

My post had nothing to do you your's, I posted after reading some of the other members comments....IE: Mare's bigot statement.

proUSA · #38 (**permalink**) 11-21-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by JHC

tee hee...it just occured to me that you pay for TV and internet service and hang out at USPO discussing environmental theories and religious bigots all day.

Maybe your objection is that you don't want to "see" it but you're happy to give your two cents worth OF it. Fair enough.

If your argument is against seeing the perceived "liberal" bent without being allowed to stand up in the theater and give your opinon, you could as easily say so.

Nope, I go to see movies (cartoons) to be entertained and laugh a little...Nothing more, nothing less.

JHC · #39 (**permalink**) 11-21-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by proUSA

Nope, I go to see movies (cartoons) to be entertained and laugh a little...Nothing more, nothing less.

I understand.

iamwhatiseem · #40 (**permalink**) 11-21-2006

HAHAHA...geez only on USPOL can a guy make a thread about a cartoon movie and the subject gets serious...shouting matches start..and then the Bible is introduced...lol

MareTranquility · #41 (**permalink**) 11-21-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank

I saw no reference to Muslims, I made no reference to any specific religious group since all religious bigots are essentially the same whatever their particular religous myth. but I appreciate the courtesy of rebuttal argument.
The conditioning placed in this children’s film is only as accurate as the environmental movement which inspired it’s filming. The size of the oceans dictates in there common existence that over fishing is something you say when your walking off the pier because your tired. Sea world presented in the same manner the L.A. Times portrays Guantanamo Bay detainees “again” is only as accurate as animal rights activists movements trying to program children into thinking zoo’s are bad and you should never go to one. This whole paragraph is vague to the point of obscurity.
With just as much accuracy I’m certain.
Ask JHC… He holds the copyrights to movie reference replies…

You can't admit to enjoying the popcorn because JHC holds copyrights to movie references? Hello? Is there anybody in there?

Hank · #42 (**permalink**) 11-22-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by JHC

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank

The movie is nothing but liberal propaganda doom and gloom and should be avoided at all cost.

Perhaps you'd like to give us an example of a childrens story that isn't attempting to impart some value judgement.

Let me see. Huckleberry fin? Nope, that’s banned, little black Sambo? Nope, banned, Tar baby? Nope banned! Nothing comes to mind. But I must point out the difference between story morals and Stalinism. The movements promoted in this children’s film attack the American way of life. You can try any angle you wish, but I was a part of these movements in the late 60’s and early 70’s. I know they were manufactured for a revolution against the established United States (Establishment.). They simply have been normalized to your generation in sheep’s clothing. None of it has ever been real, not evolution, feminism, the homo movement, environmentism nothing. You guys are living a lie, we’ll advance above our industrial period without any doom and gloom.

Hank · #43 (**permalink**) 11-22-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benjamin

Looks great.. I hope to see it soon.

Looking forward to some well-versed commentary on it. I remember our discussion on the “Passion” being 99% search engines and reviews and when I finally saw it, It sucked…

Hank · #44 (**permalink**) 11-22-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by MattLarson

Hey, the Ice Age movies rocked.

Scrat is my under-hero, just below Foamy.

Matt

Fantastic…
The squirrel was the best character. The guys that put that animation together are real artists. There inspiration was sincere, not contracted out animation for an everyday P.B.S. injection.

Hank · #45 (**permalink**) 11-22-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tor

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank

I suppose most of you have heard about the newly released movie “Happy Feet” ( http://movies.aol.com/movie/happy-feet/21862/main ) being an animated version of Al Gores- *Cough* -documentary “An Inconvenient Truth”…
Review: http://www.cinemablend.com/reviews/Happy-Feet-1917.html

Children’s films should be written for children. I mean It’s worse then watching a PBS special advertised as nature and turning out to be mind conditioning on left claims of environmentalism.
The ice caps are melting, breaking apart due to mans global warming , there food supply is gone because of mans pollution and over fishing. They message religious intolerance by the elders portrayed as religiously bigots hating anything different and banishing the little shit because he’s not like them. It’s a freaking joke.

The movie is nothing but liberal propaganda doom and gloom and should be avoided at all cost.

Gee, wonder what you would make of the message in Flushed Away? A rat flushing a socialite down the drain... certainly can put a spin on that wherein the bad democrats are out to take the lazy rich people down. So what if the movie is presenting a pressing social issue in palatable form for a child? It's also portraying the age old problem of being persecuted because you're different. Face it, the movie is funny.

Actually the rich are all democrats. (This is the kind of mind conditioning I’m talking about.) Americas billionaires ect.
Opera makes $140,000,000.oo a year. The ones liberals propagate about, 4-7,000,000 tops (Tom Cruse makes 10 in a month…). It’s business and industry that are the liberal targets, not the just barley millionaires.

Quote:

Maybe people don't like it because it's pushing the global warming issue in their face, and they don't want to admit any responsibility? because doing that would mean they would have to change their ingrained lazy habits and actually do something for the greater good, like cut back on the consumption of fossil fuels, recycle, and stop blaming the government for all the social ills in the world? Ahh, no. silly me.

There being a problem is a presentation to you. This is what Stalinism is all about. A news crew filming for hours to present you 5 or 6 fat people in a 30 second clip, C.B.S. filming for 2 days to show 4 women firefighters and 2 men at the WTC bombing among 13,000 men and 23 women, second hand smoke causing health problems when one in actuality would need to chain smoke for 40 years to increase there chances to 1 in 1000 ect.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode