Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Environmental Issues
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Environmental Issues Environment, Global Warming, Pollution, Natural Resources, Alternative Energy

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2007
pramjockey's Avatar
President
Scruffy-looking nerf herder

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 15,007

Scotland     Colorado

Re: Ski resorts affected by climate change

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigTlilODD View Post
In New Mexico, the season started late. But we have had record snowfalls.

2 weeks ago, we had more snowfall in Albuquerque than ever recorded.
It's been a pretty shitty winter here in CO, too. I'm used to snow melting/subliming within a few days; I've got a 5' pile of snow next to my driveway that's been there for a month and I suspect will be there until April.



I wouldn't say this disproves any kind of global warming theory, though.
__________________
Whan they come, Ah sall staun mah grun
Staun mah grun, an be na afraid.
Thochts ae hame tak awa mah fear
Sweat an bluid hide mah veil o tears.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2007
kinetic's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Midwest US
Posts: 11,409

United_States     United_States

Re: Ski resorts affected by climate change

Quote:
Originally Posted by onon View Post
But if natural phenomenon are emitting 550 billion tons of co2 per year into the atmosphere (95%), why is co2 in the atmosphere only accumulating at 15 billion tons per year?
I only know what I have read about the minimal amount of human vs natural co2 production from Nasa. You can work the math however and ask NASA for a further clarification. I have no reason to doubt their claims of 3.5% - 5% of all co2 are human caused.

If we stop volcanic eruptions, we would stop most of the co2 being discharged naturally. Just cap the volcanos and end global warming tomorrow.

__________________
United We Stand.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2007
County Council Member

 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 276

   
Re: Ski resorts affected by climate change

Quote:
Originally Posted by kinetic View Post
I only know what I have read about the minimal amount of human vs natural co2 production from Nasa. You can work the math however and ask NASA for a further clarification. I have no reason to doubt their claims of 3.5% - 5% of all co2 are human caused.
The reason co2 is only accumulating at 15 billion tons per year in the atmospehre, despite over 500 billion tons being emitted globally, is that there are processes removing co2 from the atmosphere.

Given that nature adds co2 to the atmosphere and takes it away too, what is the net effect of nature? The net effect is that nature removes more co2 from the atmosphere than it adds.

Without human co2 emissions the co2 levels in the atmosphere would start falling.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2007
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: US
Posts: 3,365

United_States    
Re: Ski resorts affected by climate change

Quote:
Originally Posted by onon View Post
Given that nature adds co2 to the atmosphere and takes it away too, what is the net effect of nature? The net effect is that nature removes more co2 from the atmosphere than it adds.
Then wouldn't we have reached zero billions of years ago?
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2007
County Council Member

 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 276

   
Re: Ski resorts affected by climate change

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cato View Post
Then wouldn't we have reached zero billions of years ago?
Nature's rate of co2 absorption has increased as co2 levels have increased. 300 years ago nature was emitting as much as it absorbed.

As human activity started emitting more co2, nature started absorbing more in response. Although currently it's only absorbing about half our emissions each year - which is why co2 levels are rising at about half the rate of human emissions.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2007
Citizen

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 8

Australia    
Re: Ski resorts affected by climate change

Volcanic erruptions emit only around 150 million tonnes of CO2 annually. In comparison the US emits some 5.7 billion tonnes. That's much more.

And volcanic activity is associated with cooling, not warming. That's because volcanoes spew sulphates and aerosols into the atmosphere cooling the planet.
__________________
Vote about it on www.wikimocracy.com
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2007
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: US
Posts: 3,365

United_States    
Re: Ski resorts affected by climate change

Quote:
Originally Posted by onon View Post
Nature's rate of co2 absorption has increased as co2 levels have increased. 300 years ago nature was emitting as much as it absorbed.
Ahhh, I see. So, 300 years ago there was as much CO2 as there was at the birth of the planet?
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2007
County Council Member

 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 276

   
Re: Ski resorts affected by climate change

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cato View Post
Ahhh, I see. So, 300 years ago there was as much CO2 as there was at the birth of the planet?
No, but for at least 1000 years prior to 300 years ago co2 trends were pretty flat at around 280ppm throughout.

http://www.ecoinfo.org/env_ind/regio...lobalco2_e.gif

So for that time period the earth was absorbing as much co2 as it was emitting. Only with the addition of human co2 emissions did emissions start outweighing absorption, and co2 levels in the atmosphere started to rise, following the exponential curve of co2 emissions.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2007
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: US
Posts: 3,365

United_States    
Re: Ski resorts affected by climate change

Quote:
Originally Posted by onon View Post
No, but for at least 1000 years prior to 300 years ago co2 trends were pretty flat at around 280ppm throughout.

http://www.ecoinfo.org/env_ind/regio...lobalco2_e.gif

So for that time period the earth was absorbing as much co2 as it was emitting. Only with the addition of human co2 emissions did emissions start outweighing absorption, and co2 levels in the atmosphere started to rise, following the exponential curve of co2 emissions.
So, CO2 concentrations naturally stay constant?
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2007
County Council Member

 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 276

   
Re: Ski resorts affected by climate change

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cato View Post
So, CO2 concentrations naturally stay constant?
No, they can change
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2007
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: US
Posts: 3,365

United_States    
Re: Ski resorts affected by climate change

Quote:
Originally Posted by onon View Post
No, they can change
Naturally? Oh, so these statements...

Quote:
Originally Posted by onon
The net effect is that nature removes more co2 from the atmosphere than it adds.

Without human co2 emissions the co2 levels in the atmosphere would start falling.
aren't necessarily true?
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2007
kinetic's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Midwest US
Posts: 11,409

United_States     United_States

Re: Ski resorts affected by climate change

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cato View Post
Naturally? Oh, so these statements...



aren't necessarily true?
Cato, you are still not getting it. The eath has a thermostat and the entire human population has it's hand on it turning it up higher and hotter everyday. Don't you see it?



There must be some way to make you believe that humans are turning the heat on and off like a switch. Please start ignoring the hotter burning sun. That was caused by Bush when he made Katrina into a storm to detroy the gulf for Cheney's oil futures.

The Sun isn't really burning hotter, it just 'seems' that way.
__________________
United We Stand.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2007
County Council Member

 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 276

   
Re: Ski resorts affected by climate change

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cato View Post
Naturally? Oh, so these statements...

aren't necessarily true?
They are true for the current situation, which was their context. Currently nature is removing more co2 from the atmosphere than it adds. And without human emissions co2 levels would start falling.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2007
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: US
Posts: 3,365

United_States    
Re: Ski resorts affected by climate change

Quote:
Originally Posted by onon View Post
They are true for the current situation, which was their context. Currently nature is removing more co2 from the atmosphere than it adds. And without human emissions co2 levels would start falling.
What is "current"? And how do you know that "without human emissions CO2 levels would start falling?"
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2007
County Council Member

 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 276

   
Re: Ski resorts affected by climate change

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cato View Post
What is "current"?
The last decade is the best example - co2 levels are rising at only about half of human emission rate. Without human emissions co2 levels couldn't be rising.

Quote:
And how do you know that "without human emissions CO2 levels would start falling?"
Because nature is absorbing more co2 from the atmosphere than it is emitting into it. Therefore left alone co2 levels in the atmosphere would start falling. They only rise because human co2 emissions (~28 billion tons per year) are double the net rate of natural absorption (~15 billion tons per year)

The reason nature is absorbing more co2 than it is emitting is because there is an abundance of co2 in the atmosphere at this time.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online