Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Environmental Issues

Environmental Issues Environment, Global Warming, Pollution, Natural Resources, Alternative Energy

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2007
Meridious's Avatar
Meridious Meridious is offline
Ron Paul is a Nutwackaroo

 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: USA - Beacon of Freedom and Democracy
Posts: 2,899

Alaska     Scotland

Re: Pollution Credits

I think it is a great thing to invest in. Companies that the rich PAY to keep from having to be responsible will probably be a big hit.

If I see any go public, I will probably invest.

There is no limit what the elite will do to keep themselves from doing as they say.

And Al Gore is smart to have started the carbon credit company (to which he consistently pays himself) so that he can sidestep his own "carbon bigfoot-print"
__________________

"War is nothing but a continuation of politics with the admixture of other means"
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2007
AjaxPress's Avatar
AjaxPress AjaxPress is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 4,470

United_States     Ethiopia

Re: Pollution Credits

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Conservatives are hostile to any effort BY GOVT to control human lives is more accurate.
I could have sworn I saw a bunch of conservatives in Congress trying to pass laws to prevent gay marriage, but that's off-topic. I could have there are conservatives all over the placed trying to dictate what a woman can do with her own body, but that's off-topic too, sorry.

Conservatives are even hostile to the pollution credits idea because it's a good idea. Just like their opposition to the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993. Whoops off-topic again. I guess the point of this thread is that conservative politicians are hypocrites who constantly oppose excellent ideas.
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2007
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,642

United_States    
Re: Pollution Credits

Quote:
Originally Posted by AjaxPress View Post
I could have sworn I saw a bunch of conservatives in Congress trying to pass laws to prevent gay marriage, but that's off-topic. I could have there are conservatives all over the placed trying to dictate what a woman can do with her own body, but that's off-topic too, sorry.

Conservatives are even hostile to the pollution credits idea because it's a good idea. Just like their opposition to the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993. Whoops off-topic again. I guess the point of this thread is that conservative politicians are hypocrites who constantly oppose excellent ideas.
Youre confusing republicans with conservatives. I dont think anyone has a problem with private citizens paying for environmentally friendly programs. What we are upset about is the hypocrasy that doing so absolves you from excessive pollution.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2007
DGG's Avatar
DGG DGG is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,820

Sweden    
Re: Pollution Credits

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malvolio View Post
You are not forced to buy emission rights for pollution in past years. The theory behind is that private corporations have to pay for the use of public resources and so to internalize social costs (in this case pollution) into the production costs of those entities that produce pollution and to give them an economically efficient incentive to cut down pollution.

I know I would not have to pay for past years. The thing is, though, that if I am emitting x tonnes of gas into the air every year, and then suddenly the Government wants me to start paying for it, they seize a right that has previously been mine, i.e. the right to make those emissions.
__________________
President Josiah Bartlet: Sweden has a 100% literacy rate. 100%! How do they do that?
Leo McGarry: Maybe they don't and they can't add.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online