Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Environmental Issues Environment, Global Warming, Pollution, Natural Resources, Alternative Energy |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush v. Gore re:energy consumption
Is Jeebus comin' Bob?
__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon Staun ma groon al nae be afraid Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush v. Gore re:energy consumption
If he is, he's gonna be pissed.
As the late Sam Kinison once opined, discussing televangelists: "You Jesus is up in Heaven freaking out over all the shit they say he said. He's flipping through the Bible, going 'Where the fuck did I say build a water slide? I never said build an old folks' home and use it as a tax write off!'" Matt
__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush v. Gore re:energy consumption
Quote:
(Do you like the Bloody hell in place of a closing antidote?)
__________________
Only a liberal would know how hard it is to get a nicotine patch to stick to a monkey. |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush v. Gore re:energy consumption
Personally, I'm waiting for Hale-Bopp to swing back around & pick me up.
__________________
"The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no God. It neither breaks my leg, nor picks my pocket." Thomas Jefferson |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush v. Gore re:energy consumption
I think NASA blew it up our something. Probably a rightwing Christian conspiracy of sorts…
__________________
Only a liberal would know how hard it is to get a nicotine patch to stick to a monkey. |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush v. Gore re:energy consumption
I never really liked Gore, but since his movie I changed my oppinion. It's nice to see someone with a good cause. It's good to see someone working hard for a change. bush could learn a few things from this man.
|
|
||||
|
Re: Bush v. Gore re:energy consumption
Well, this thread kind of points out what a flaming hypocrite he is. It may be a good cause, but he certainly isn't committed to it and is parading it around for attention.
__________________
|
|
||||
|
Re: Bush v. Gore re:energy consumption
Quote:
I argue he is parading it around because it demands attention. |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush v. Gore re:energy consumption
Do not eat the pudding at this time. Repeat, do not eat the pudding at this time.
__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush v. Gore re:energy consumption
Quote:
If you watched live earth you would know he drives a hybrid vehicle (as do i) and is fully equipping his house with all the latest doodads that im not looking up, but I know hes exceeding my own efforts, and I try to do my part so I am afraid I am not ignorant enough about the man to agree with you. |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush v. Gore re:energy consumption
Quote:
Plus, not all profit is monetary.
__________________
|
|
||||
|
Re: Bush v. Gore re:energy consumption
The article is titled "Urban Legends" and is someone own blog. I could post a similiar blog that says that one was posted by bush. That wouldn't make it true.
|
|
||||
|
Re: Bush v. Gore re:energy consumption
Er, no, it's not a blog.
Snopes is a fact-checking site, and quite diligent. Matt
__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.uspoliticsonline.com/environmental-issues/39601-bush-v-gore-re-energy-consumption.html
|
|||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date |
| Bush v. Gore re:energy consumption - U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum | This thread | Refback | 07-20-2007 06:45 AM |