An Al Gore Nobel counterpart (UN Scientist)refuses award and denounces alarmism - Page 2 - U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum

tiny tim · #16 (**permalink**) 11-08-2007

Is the Wall Street Journal no longer part of the "MSM"? Quick, without googling, name a pro global warming scientist. NO GOOGLING!!!

Andrewl · #17 (**permalink**) 11-08-2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by kramer

My sources (and they are credible science sites) say that the energy output of the sun has been increasing by 0.05%/decade since the 1970's AND that the last 70 years of the sun has seen more sunspot activity than at any other period that goes back 8000 years. I don't know where you got your information from.

http://www.mps.mpg.de/dokumente/publ...lanki/c153.pdf
http://www.aimes.ucar.edu/MEETINGS/2...mel%20copy.pdf
http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk/media...pa20071880.pdf
http://skepticalscience.com/solar-ac...al-warming.htm

Quote:

By the way, you often write detailed and lengthy responses. Are you a professor or expert in this subject (environment)?

Kramer

Im just a concerned citizen.

Andrew

Mr Toastrack · #18 (**permalink**) 11-12-2007

Quote:

Yah, uh huh. I put a lot of "words and characters". Here's what you seem to have really wanted:

drivel drivel

drivel drivel

There are your characters. That you must have been imagining in my previous post # 9.

Oh yeah. Here's some words:

You are hardly worth the effort of this reply

What ? Have you decided it's time to turn this into a contest of who can make a bigger ass of themselves ?

I guess that's easier than admitting I'm right when I say:

This issue is still under much study and scrutiny. To draw conclusions this early is meaningless.

and

Al Gores foolish little propaganda film might have had ONE good effect at least. That is to encourage more study and REAL scientific application towards the study of climate, climate change and whether or not, and how LARGE the effects humans actually HAVE on the planets climate. If this study can be done without humans silly EGOS bending the results (as we see a lot of in this particular one) we'll get closer to the realities of what is going on. It won't be quick and simple to explain or understand either. You cannot solve a three variable equation if you choose to completely ignore two variables. By choice OR by ignorance.

Mr Tripps, can I point out, in the spirit of constructive criticism, that you need to start disproving rather than disapproving?

Also, please stop going on about Al Gore. Try to move on.

I've tried to make this as concise as possibly, as I am acutely aware that you only read and digest around 5% of what other people say......

Thanks,
Alfonso Toastrack

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode