Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Environmental Issues
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Environmental Issues Environment, Global Warming, Pollution, Natural Resources, Alternative Energy

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
fishjoel's Avatar
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,255

United_States     Pennsylvania

Re: Brown: 50 Days to Save the World From Global Warming

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewl View Post
The climate right now is changing at a rate unprecedented in any previous global climate change episode. The current climate is changing as a result of industrial civilization.
Hmmm...I don't know...the event that caused the dinosaurs to go extinct was much more extreme than what is occurring now. What's happening now isn't even in the same ballpark of of that event. It's like pee-wee league vs MLB.
__________________
A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: earth
Posts: 1,171

   
Re: Brown: 50 Days to Save the World From Global Warming

Fifty days would be close to the November options expiration for U.S. stocks. I am guessing that Al Gore has some stock options that are out of the money, and he promised to cut Gordy in on some cash if he can help get the green stocks up enough before they expire.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Melanie's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Don't blame me... I voted for Ron Paul

 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Location: Walton, KY
Posts: 1,874

United_States     Kentucky

Re: Brown: 50 Days to Save the World From Global Warming

This is all of the information about this treaty. It is basically redistribution of wealth from the US to 3rd world countries. It also supercedes our Constitution (but who cares about that thing anyway)

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Andrewl's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 12,893

   
Re: Brown: 50 Days to Save the World From Global Warming

Quote:
Originally Posted by fishjoel View Post
Hmmm...I don't know...the event that caused the dinosaurs to go extinct was much more extreme than what is occurring now. What's happening now isn't even in the same ballpark of of that event. It's like pee-wee league vs MLB.
hehe.. yes. But keep in mind that the argument favored by denialists is that GW is natural. My point is that the rate of warming currently being observed and recorded is unprecedented when compared to "natural" global climate change episodes.

I think we can rule out any sudden massive asteroid strikes in the last 30 or so years. We probably would have noticed.

Andrew
__________________
“...corporations and those who run them cannot stop exploiting resources and amassing wealth until they have... .I cannot finish this sentence, because the truth is that can never stop; like cancer, they can only continue to expand until they kill the host.”

-- Derrick Jensen
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
daddio's Avatar
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 8,837

United_States     Virginia

Re: Brown: 50 Days to Save the World From Global Warming

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewl View Post
hehe.. yes. But keep in mind that the argument favored by denialists is that GW is natural. My point is that the rate of warming currently being observed and recorded is unprecedented when compared to "natural" global climate change episodes.

I think we can rule out any sudden massive asteroid strikes in the last 30 or so years. We probably would have noticed.

Andrew
LOOK OUT ! BEHIND YOU !

Say Andy, me being a tree hugger from way back (I've been worried about deforestation for 40 years) do you consider this to be a significant factor in the big old GW picture as well ?
__________________
Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

Jesus loves you, allah wants you dead

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Andrewl's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 12,893

   
Re: Brown: 50 Days to Save the World From Global Warming

Quote:
Originally Posted by daddio View Post
LOOK OUT ! BEHIND YOU !

Say Andy, me being a tree hugger from way back (I've been worried about deforestation for 40 years) do you consider this to be a significant factor in the big old GW picture as well ?
Yes. Deforestation is responsible for about 20% of emissions.

Andrew
__________________
“...corporations and those who run them cannot stop exploiting resources and amassing wealth until they have... .I cannot finish this sentence, because the truth is that can never stop; like cancer, they can only continue to expand until they kill the host.”

-- Derrick Jensen
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
daddio's Avatar
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 8,837

United_States     Virginia

Re: Brown: 50 Days to Save the World From Global Warming

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewl View Post
Yes. Deforestation is responsible for about 20% of emissions.

Andrew


OK, woudl that be because of the CO2 (others?) that they are NOT "eating", CO2 that is being emmited as a result of the deforestation activities, both , other or something else ?
__________________
Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

Jesus loves you, allah wants you dead

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Andrewl's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 12,893

   
Re: Brown: 50 Days to Save the World From Global Warming

Quote:
Originally Posted by daddio View Post
OK, woudl that be because of the CO2 (others?) that they are NOT "eating", CO2 that is being emmited as a result of the deforestation activities, both , other or something else ?
Both, and other things as well.

Cutting down and clearing any old growth forest destroys an extremely important CO2 sink. Also burning is a common way to clear forest, directly emitting CO2.

Also you have to look at what the land is then used for after the clearcutting. Typically it is intensive farming, which is also a source of cO2 emissions (and methane).

Andrew
__________________
“...corporations and those who run them cannot stop exploiting resources and amassing wealth until they have... .I cannot finish this sentence, because the truth is that can never stop; like cancer, they can only continue to expand until they kill the host.”

-- Derrick Jensen
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
fishjoel's Avatar
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,255

United_States     Pennsylvania

Re: Brown: 50 Days to Save the World From Global Warming

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewl View Post
hehe.. yes. But keep in mind that the argument favored by denialists is that GW is natural. My point is that the rate of warming currently being observed and recorded is unprecedented when compared to "natural" global climate change episodes.

I think we can rule out any sudden massive asteroid strikes in the last 30 or so years. We probably would have noticed.

Andrew
I could have sworn asteroids where natural...

Anyways, it was a much more dramatic change, than what's occurring now, and life still was able to adapt and overcome. Why wouldn't life be able to do the same thing with a less extreme change in the climate if it has already accomplished this task in a much worse scenario?
__________________
A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Andrewl's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 12,893

   
Re: Brown: 50 Days to Save the World From Global Warming

Quote:
Originally Posted by fishjoel View Post
I could have sworn asteroids where natural...
Certainly. When talking about climate change people are usually referring to the slow gradual change of the earths systems over the 4 billion years of its life.

Massive asteroid impacts are in a somewhat different category, although they do cause climate change, that is true.


Quote:
Anyways, it was a much more dramatic change, than what's occurring now, and life still was able to adapt and overcome. Why wouldn't life be able to do the same thing with a less extreme change in the climate if it has already accomplished this task in a much worse scenario?
Some form of life probably would adapt and overcome, not necessarily life as we know it.

My issue is that this episode of climate change is caused by global industrial civilization. Under natural circumstances it is reasonable assume that we would have hundreds of thousands of years of stable environment before the climate changed naturally, and slowly. This means that we as humans, but also many other life forms, would have time to adapt. Right now we have destroyed and are destroying so many habitats and ecosystems all over the globe that if we survive this climate change episode, which we probably will in some form, other life forms simply won't have the space or be able to adapt in time. Which means a great deal for our long term survival.

We are literally talking about a mass extinction event on par with the earths largest mass extinctions. And it can be avoided, unlike naturally occurring climate change or asteroid impacts. Its an ethical and moral problem, just as much if not more than it is a scientific or technical problem.

If we go with your argument that "life will regenerate and survive anyway so why should we care" - than how is this different from saying the holocaust was really no big deal because enough Jewish people survived to regenerate their population anyway?

Andrew
__________________
“...corporations and those who run them cannot stop exploiting resources and amassing wealth until they have... .I cannot finish this sentence, because the truth is that can never stop; like cancer, they can only continue to expand until they kill the host.”

-- Derrick Jensen
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
daddio's Avatar
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 8,837

United_States     Virginia

Re: Brown: 50 Days to Save the World From Global Warming

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewl View Post
Both, and other things as well.

Cutting down and clearing any old growth forest destroys an extremely important CO2 sink. Also burning is a common way to clear forest, directly emitting CO2.

Also you have to look at what the land is then used for after the clearcutting. Typically it is intensive farming, which is also a source of cO2 emissions (and methane).

Andrew

well at least we can agree that deforestation is terrible, who would have thought !
__________________
Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

Jesus loves you, allah wants you dead

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 21,272

United_States    
Re: Brown: 50 Days to Save the World From Global Warming

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewl View Post
No. That's the role of the oil and gas funded PR groups that purposely and deliberately obfuscate the science.



No. You are victim of bullshit. The period of 2000-2008 is warmer than the period from 1990-1999. This is just plain old fact. Don't be confused or mislead by short term variability.



Figure 1. Global temperature according to NASA GISS data since 1980. The red line shows annual data, the larger red square a preliminary value for 2009, based on January-August. The green line shows the 25-year linear trend (0.19 ºC per decade). The blue lines show the two most recent ten-year trends (0.18 ºC per decade for 1998-2007, 0.19 ºC per decade for 1999-2008) and illustrate that these recent decadal trends are entirely consistent with the long-term trend and IPCC predictions. Even the highly “cherry-picked” 11-year period starting with the warm 1998 and ending with the cold 2008 still shows a warming trend of 0.11 ºC per decade (which may surprise some lay people who tend to connect the end points, rather than include all ten data points into a proper trend calculation).

And more explanation of why the earth is still warming.

How we know global warming is still happening

How we know global warming is happening, Part 2




Why do you hate science?

Andrew
so why is it YOUR science always trumps everyones elses science?
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Andrewl's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 12,893

   
Re: Brown: 50 Days to Save the World From Global Warming

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
so why is it YOUR science always trumps everyones elses science?


I sourced the science as it is. No rebuttal i have received has brought any science whatsoever to the discussion.

Please, I'm waiting for you to show me quantitatively how the graph i provided and sourced is incorrect. Waiting....

Andrew
__________________
“...corporations and those who run them cannot stop exploiting resources and amassing wealth until they have... .I cannot finish this sentence, because the truth is that can never stop; like cancer, they can only continue to expand until they kill the host.”

-- Derrick Jensen
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
fishjoel's Avatar
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,255

United_States     Pennsylvania

Re: Brown: 50 Days to Save the World From Global Warming

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewl View Post
Some form of life probably would adapt and overcome, not necessarily life as we know it.

My issue is that this episode of climate change is caused by global industrial civilization. Under natural circumstances it is reasonable assume that we would have hundreds of thousands of years of stable environment before the climate changed naturally, and slowly. This means that we as humans, but also many other life forms, would have time to adapt. Right now we have destroyed and are destroying so many habitats and ecosystems all over the globe that if we survive this climate change episode, which we probably will in some form, other life forms simply won't have the space or be able to adapt in time. Which means a great deal for our long term survival.

We are literally talking about a mass extinction event on par with the earths largest mass extinctions. And it can be avoided, unlike naturally occurring climate change or asteroid impacts. Its an ethical and moral problem, just as much if not more than it is a scientific or technical problem.

If we go with your argument that "life will regenerate and survive anyway so why should we care" - than how is this different from saying the holocaust was really no big deal because enough Jewish people survived to regenerate their population anyway?

Andrew
So let me get this straight. You agreed that the event (possible asteroid impact) was a much more traumatic event than what is going on today, by leaps and bounds, yet you said life won't be able to adapt well enough. That seems completely contradictory. Life really doesn't decrease, it just changes. If the event that made dinosaurs extinct wouldn't have happened then there would be tons of life forms that exist today that never would have been. The climate change enabled a fundamental change to which types of life forms were viable. Regardless, life adapted in a worse environmental shift than what is happening now so this change should be a cake walk.
__________________
A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Andrewl's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 12,893

   
Re: Brown: 50 Days to Save the World From Global Warming

Quote:
Originally Posted by fishjoel View Post
So let me get this straight. You agreed that the event (possible asteroid impact) was a much more traumatic event than what is going on today, by leaps and bounds, yet you said life won't be able to adapt well enough. That seems completely contradictory. Life really doesn't decrease, it just changes. If the event that made dinosaurs extinct wouldn't have happened then there would be tons of life forms that exist today that never would have been. The climate change enabled a fundamental change to which types of life forms were viable. Regardless, life adapted in a worse environmental shift than what is happening now so this change should be a cake walk.
I never said the asteroid impact was more traumatic than the possible consequences of AGW. Indeed, I said the exact opposite. I clearly said what we are doing is equal to the mass extinctions of times past (but worse, because we are occupying too many spaces where life might otherwise rebound). i agreed that an asteroid impact happens faster than AGW, that is not that same thing as the ultimate results.

Try to read my posts again, you failed the first time.

Andrew
__________________
“...corporations and those who run them cannot stop exploiting resources and amassing wealth until they have... .I cannot finish this sentence, because the truth is that can never stop; like cancer, they can only continue to expand until they kill the host.”

-- Derrick Jensen
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online