Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Grand Central > Welcome! / News & Announcements / USPO FrontPage > Front Page News

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-2007
mawg mawg is offline
Lieutenant Governor

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Georgia , USA
Posts: 407

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: First gay couple legally married in Iowa

Quote:
Originally Posted by pramjockey View Post
Huh?

China and Russia are far from leftist regimes. They have big governments which control much of the citizenry's lives.

Much like you seem to be asking for.
those governments are both amoral and liberal in their social programs, which would be more up your alley
Reply With Quote
  #122 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-2007
pramjockey's Avatar
pramjockey pramjockey is offline
OMG!
Non-wussy liberal

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 12,640

Scotland     Colorado

Re: First gay couple legally married in Iowa

So now I'm amoral?

Fascinating.


On what basis do you make this judgement of me?
__________________
"Take me back to the way life's never been."
Reply With Quote
  #123 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-2007
mawg mawg is offline
Lieutenant Governor

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Georgia , USA
Posts: 407

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: First gay couple legally married in Iowa

Quote:
Originally Posted by pramjockey View Post
So now I'm amoral?

Fascinating.


On what basis do you make this judgement of me?
liberal was what I was sayng in your case
Reply With Quote
  #124 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-2007
pramjockey's Avatar
pramjockey pramjockey is offline
OMG!
Non-wussy liberal

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 12,640

Scotland     Colorado

Re: First gay couple legally married in Iowa

Yeah, I'm liberal. Root word of liberty and all that.
__________________
"Take me back to the way life's never been."
Reply With Quote
  #125 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-2007
Otter's Avatar
Otter Otter is offline
Secretary of Defense
still searching for the salmon

 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: Kituwha
Posts: 2,645

United_States     Ireland

Re: First gay couple legally married in Iowa

Quote:
Originally Posted by mawg View Post
like I said , the government that is supposed to be representing myself and the 80% of Americans who are Christians
is condoning , supporting , and giving a stamp of legitimacy to a behavior which is not in our interests and doing so with our tax money.

while I am not being forced to "do " it , I am being forced to pay for the sanctioning of it .
No one is asking you to pay for their wedding. How is the fomation of stable couples of whatever gender configuation against your intrests? In what way are you being harmed?
__________________
"The only abnormality is the incapacity to love"
-Anias Nin
Reply With Quote
  #126 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-2007
mawg mawg is offline
Lieutenant Governor

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Georgia , USA
Posts: 407

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: First gay couple legally married in Iowa

Quote:
Originally Posted by Otter View Post
No one is asking you to pay for their wedding. How is the fomation of stable couples of whatever gender configuation against your intrests? In what way are you being harmed?
I already explained this , if you cannot understand that then you should just resign yourself to disagreeing with me because my position on this issue is not subject to change .
Reply With Quote
  #127 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-2007
pramjockey's Avatar
pramjockey pramjockey is offline
OMG!
Non-wussy liberal

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 12,640

Scotland     Colorado

Re: First gay couple legally married in Iowa

Then why post on a discussion forum about it?
__________________
"Take me back to the way life's never been."
Reply With Quote
  #128 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2007
mawg mawg is offline
Lieutenant Governor

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Georgia , USA
Posts: 407

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: First gay couple legally married in Iowa

Quote:
Originally Posted by pramjockey View Post
Then why post on a discussion forum about it?
because discussion implies that once someone states their reasons the other person comments on those instead of repeating a request for reasons.

once the question has been answered , continuing to ask it is not discussion or debate.
Reply With Quote
  #129 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2007
pramjockey's Avatar
pramjockey pramjockey is offline
OMG!
Non-wussy liberal

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 12,640

Scotland     Colorado

Re: First gay couple legally married in Iowa

Quote:
Originally Posted by mawg View Post
because discussion implies that once someone states their reasons the other person comments on those instead of repeating a request for reasons.

once the question has been answered , continuing to ask it is not discussion or debate.
A fair point.

But, the impression that I've gotten (correct me if I'm wrong) is that you're not willing to even consider the other side, regardless of what evidence they present.

Two examples of this are gender and sexuality. Gender is not a binary thing (male or female only), much as you want it to be. Biologically speaking, there are variations that don't fit into either category. And, with sexuality, Kinsey's research shows more of a spectrum from gay to hetero than a binary (or trinary with bisexuality) nature. Based on what I've read from you, you won't even accept these basic facts, much less explain how you'd legislate or treat these varying situations.
__________________
"Take me back to the way life's never been."
Reply With Quote
  #130 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2007
mawg mawg is offline
Lieutenant Governor

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Georgia , USA
Posts: 407

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: First gay couple legally married in Iowa

Quote:
Originally Posted by pramjockey View Post
A fair point.

But, the impression that I've gotten (correct me if I'm wrong) is that you're not willing to even consider the other side, regardless of what evidence they present.

Two examples of this are gender and sexuality. Gender is not a binary thing (male or female only), much as you want it to be. Biologically speaking, there are variations that don't fit into either category. And, with sexuality, Kinsey's research shows more of a spectrum from gay to hetero than a binary (or trinary with bisexuality) nature. Based on what I've read from you, you won't even accept these basic facts, much less explain how you'd legislate or treat these varying situations.
gender is a one or the other case , with the sole exception of hermaphrodites those are odd cases

no surgery or wishful thinking changes a gender


sexuality is either natural ( heterosexual ) or unnatural ( homosexual)

unnatural sexual orientation is a choice and a behavior it is not inborn

while I have no desire to persecute homosexuals for their choice of behavior , I do not want my tax money spent nor the government representing me condoning or offering legitimacy , or conferring the sanctity of marriage on unnatural and unacceptable behaviors as if it were normal and on a par with natural behavior.


if that isnt liberal PC on my part , I can only say ...good , as long as I am opposite to the liberal and PC ideal then I know I am correct
Reply With Quote
  #131 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2007
Non Sequitur's Avatar
Non Sequitur Non Sequitur is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Saginaw
Posts: 1,056

United_States     Netherlands

Re: First gay couple legally married in Iowa

Quote:
Originally Posted by mawg View Post


if that isnt liberal PC on my part , I can only say ...good , as long as I am opposite to the liberal and PC ideal then I know I am correct
that is a little far don't you think.
__________________
"A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent."
-John Calvin
Reply With Quote
  #132 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2007
mawg mawg is offline
Lieutenant Governor

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Georgia , USA
Posts: 407

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: First gay couple legally married in Iowa

Quote:
Originally Posted by Non Sequitur View Post
that is a little far don't you think.
not in the least

most PC / liberal ideals are contrary to decent or moral behavior ,and common sense in my experience
Reply With Quote
  #133 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2007
pramjockey's Avatar
pramjockey pramjockey is offline
OMG!
Non-wussy liberal

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 12,640

Scotland     Colorado

Re: First gay couple legally married in Iowa

Quote:
Originally Posted by mawg View Post
gender is a one or the other case , with the sole exception of hermaphrodites those are odd cases

no surgery or wishful thinking changes a gender


sexuality is either natural ( heterosexual ) or unnatural ( homosexual)

unnatural sexual orientation is a choice and a behavior it is not inborn

while I have no desire to persecute homosexuals for their choice of behavior , I do not want my tax money spent nor the government representing me condoning or offering legitimacy , or conferring the sanctity of marriage on unnatural and unacceptable behaviors as if it were normal and on a par with natural behavior.
But what if you're wrong? Science sure seems to indicate so.

Quote:
if that isnt liberal PC on my part , I can only say ...good , as long as I am opposite to the liberal and PC ideal then I know I am correct
Well, I know you're dead wrong, because the facts contradict you.
__________________
"Take me back to the way life's never been."
Reply With Quote
  #134 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2007
Otter's Avatar
Otter Otter is offline
Secretary of Defense
still searching for the salmon

 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: Kituwha
Posts: 2,645

United_States     Ireland

Re: First gay couple legally married in Iowa

Quote:
Originally Posted by mawg View Post
gender is a one or the other case , with the sole exception of hermaphrodites those are odd cases

no surgery or wishful thinking changes a gender
I think you are cunfusing sex and gender; it's commonly done. Sex is the biological state of being male or female. Gender is the social expression of masculinity or feminity. While one could argue that sex is binary (dismissing anyone who deviates from this abberent), gender clearly isn't. Not only does no one behave purely and exclusively 'masculine' or 'feminine', you can't even get a clear agreement of what that would be.

Quote:
sexuality is either natural ( heterosexual ) or unnatural ( homosexual)

unnatural sexual orientation is a choice and a behavior it is not inborn
I have two points to make with this. FIrst, how do you determine what is natural? Second, does being natural make something right? (or conversely, is anything that is unnatural therefore wrong?)

Quote:
while I have no desire to persecute homosexuals for their choice of behavior , I do not want my tax money spent nor the government representing me condoning or offering legitimacy , or conferring the sanctity of marriage on unnatural and unacceptable behaviors as if it were normal and on a par with natural behavior.


if that isnt liberal PC on my part , I can only say ...good , as long as I am opposite to the liberal and PC ideal then I know I am correct
OK, fine. But again, you aren't being asked to pay for anyone's wedding.
__________________
"The only abnormality is the incapacity to love"
-Anias Nin
Reply With Quote
  #135 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2007
mawg mawg is offline
Lieutenant Governor

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Georgia , USA
Posts: 407

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: First gay couple legally married in Iowa

Quote:
Originally Posted by Otter View Post
I think you are cunfusing sex and gender; it's commonly done. Sex is the biological state of being male or female. Gender is the social expression of masculinity or feminity. While one could argue that sex is binary (dismissing anyone who deviates from this abberent), gender clearly isn't. Not only does no one behave purely and exclusively 'masculine' or 'feminine', you can't even get a clear agreement of what that would be.


I have two points to make with this. FIrst, how do you determine what is natural? Second, does being natural make something right? (or conversely, is anything that is unnatural therefore wrong?)


OK, fine. But again, you aren't being asked to pay for anyone's wedding.
apparently you have me confused with someone who is confused .
gender is a black and white issue period .

I cannot help you understand if you have no concept of what is right and wrong and it's relationship to the natural and unnatural.
that is too confused a mental state for me to try to help you unravel.


and I never ever said I was being asked to pay for a wedding , this is a irrelevant and misleading suggestion on your part
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online