It is true that the white population is seeing lower birth rates when compared to others, but how does this constitute a genocide? Are whites being killed in mass numbers as well? Otherwise this is no genocide. It's just the white population having less children, or the amount of mixed marriages (but as one poster pointed out, white genes still are passed down.)

In regards to 'white' and 'black' nationalism, both are equally as ridiculous and should be regarded as such equally. If one is given a certain treatment and the other no, that's just bullshit.

Frank you are believing the Sam hater's hype. I don't hate Christian folk. I only hate the evangelicals that want to bring about the rapture and think that life on earth is just a waiting period for heaven, therefore it's ok to destroy earth. I only hate the people like the ones in the White House who use the born again Christian religion to rally the masses around their war plans. I don't hate all Christians. Don't be stupid. Oh wait, you can't help, you are a white supremist. Oops.

This is coming from some liberal socialist communist pussbag who uses a term like 'supremist.' I would rather be a white 'supremist' then some Lenin-loving Soviet-wannabe democrat like you.

I think it's so funny that people use words like Soviet and Marxist to describe democrats. Most democrats I have ever met are capitalist. They simply feel that business needs more rules to abide by and that pure free market capitalism doesn't always have the best results so rules are needed to prevent the bad side effects. I communist or socialist would not actually be a true democrat since most of the DNC platform is simply for regulations to work within the capitalist system rather than something to bring it down and replace it with socialism/anarchism/communism. The democrats are actually closer to free market capitalists than the conservative candidates in most other western democracies.

__________________
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

Are the russians really whites ? I'm wondering, because you know, they're commies and stuff. And Hitler said that they were an inferior race, so they can't really be whites. Paul_John and Frank, what do you think?

__________________
Client: In six days, do you hear me, six days, God made the world. And you are not bloody well capable of making me a pair of trousers in three months!
Tailor: But my dear Sir, my dear Sir, look at the world, and look at my trousers.
(Beckett)

I have other questions. I read on the stormfront forums (in which you are registered, frank; and I don't doubt that your friend paul_john is registered too) that someone who is 1/8th asian is not white.

What is the limit in order to really be considered white?

When did we become "whites"? Is it just the color of the skin, or are other things taken in account (intelligence, physical abilities...)?

What makes our race particularly valuable, so that we must preserve our genes? This certainly doesn't have anything to do with nationalism, as whites do not form a nation or a culture; and even then, coloured people who totally embrace the white's culture are still rejected by that movement. So I would be pleased if you could stop using the term "multiculturalism", and express what is wrong with "multiracialism".

__________________
Client: In six days, do you hear me, six days, God made the world. And you are not bloody well capable of making me a pair of trousers in three months!
Tailor: But my dear Sir, my dear Sir, look at the world, and look at my trousers.
(Beckett)

Those are unfair labels when tossed out without cause aren't they? It is almost as unfair to label a white nationalist a white 'supremist' without cause. Would you not agree?

If they are not a bunch of people at 'Stormfront: Russia' will be heartbroken!

When and where did Hitler make that claim again? I am not exactly an authority on the man...

Lets just say I take David Lanes view on the matter!

Who is White?

http://www.whitestruggle.net/Who_Is_White.html

Sorry about the location of the article but this seems to be the only place that carries it! The language in the article is also somewhat extreme with usage of the terms 'Aryan' and all but it does convey the underlining message of what constitutes 'white' in my view...

I do not care what you do in fact I do not care if you personally live or die.

I try to judge each person by his/her own merit. I don't believe I have ever called you a name personally. Maybe you judge others by their merits rather than their race and you just happen to have an attraction to pale skin. I don't know. When people start to complain about having people around them that are not white then I start to feel differently.

__________________
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

There is nothing that makes our race particularly valuable, but I would say that we are as valuable as any other race and that we have a right to exist.

Who are whites? Well a pretty good indicator is the colour of the skin. If one person is 1/8th asian then he IS 1/8th asian. And i would regard him as 8 times more white than asian.

So, only the color of the skin is important, and other factors are of no importance whatsoever? What about people who aren't really white, but aren't arabs or blacks either?
I'm thinking of the spanish for example, with their tanned skin. Are they "less white" than, say, the english or the german? Are they white at all? I am repeating myself, but I am struggling to understand where is the limit between whiteness and colouredness.


No one is saying that this right doesn't exist, however many people disagree when you say it is a duty. Also, people consider that breeding with non-whites doesn't "destroy" them. In effect, to my knowledge, it is not races that have rights, but individuals. If you consider that, except for a small part of the so-called elite, the white race isn't even conscious of its particularity and distinction from the coloured races, how can it have such a thing as rights?

Is it just that? In that case, would a good sun tan reduce someone's belonging to the white race?

And you would be wrong, as he is only 7 times more white than asian.

__________________
Client: In six days, do you hear me, six days, God made the world. And you are not bloody well capable of making me a pair of trousers in three months!
Tailor: But my dear Sir, my dear Sir, look at the world, and look at my trousers.
(Beckett)

I think my town is the best example of how race has nothing to do with problems in a community. I live in a college town with many international students that are African, Asian, European, Hispanic, and African. I can't think of a single instance of one of them being in any major trouble. I would say the non-white population on campus is 20-30% and almost all the real problems come from drunk frat boys. The last major crime in this town was a hit and run in which a drunk frat boy killed an Arab student. Before that it was a fire started by a white frat boy. Before that a white student choked his girlfriend to death. We get reports of fights on a regular basis on campus and it always happens on a friday or saturday night after parties that are almost all white.

__________________
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

Another name for the white race is the Caucasian race. When I say white a could have said caucasian. Well, spanish is just another etnic group within the Caucasian race. They are just as caucasian as the germans.

I am making the observation that the more brown a town or a country becomes the more it looks like the 3rd world.

I was precisely discussing that. The "white race" is not distinct from other races: it is impossible to draw the line. It is not unique as in "unified", as it is formed by many ethnies; it is not unique as in "only", as there are many other races.

I wouldn't want to discuss that guy's tastes. He is, however, completely wrong in his last sentence.

Oh well, I see that the requirements aren't to high. That's a good thing. Or perhaps it's just that you guys aren't very good in biology?



By the way, the guy managed to not answer the question that he wrote in such big letters. So, I'm asking it again Frank. Who is white? I'd like to know your opinion, not to waste my time reading some other guy's attempt at evading the question.

__________________
Client: In six days, do you hear me, six days, God made the world. And you are not bloody well capable of making me a pair of trousers in three months!
Tailor: But my dear Sir, my dear Sir, look at the world, and look at my trousers.
(Beckett)

.

Spain is a nation, how exactly does a nation have an ethnicity. A nation is a bounded land mass with a government and a single language, but from what I understand about racial catagories (and I admit, racial catagories are the LEAST logical taxonomy in human culture) national boundaries can not define them. Whats the "race" of Americans if thats the case?

Right which is why white men have NEVER desired sex or relationships with women of color. HA! I think a whole generation of mixed kids have something to say about that.

__________________
Yesterday, John McCain actually said that if he’s president he’ll take on, and I quote, 'the old boys’ network in Washington.' I’m not making this up. This is somebody been in Congress for 26 years, who put seven of the most powerful Washington lobbyists in charge of his campaign. And now he tells us that he’s the one who’s gonna take on the old boys' network,” he said. “In the McCain campaign that’s called a staff meeting!- Obama, 9/17/2008