Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Gun Rights and Security Issues Gun Control, Crime, Drugs, Defence, Homeland Security, Immigration, Law Enforcement |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Re: Mexico May Take Fence Dispute to U.N.
Why would they need to issue work permits for labor market participants in their own country? All I am saying is that if the US were to grant work visas, the originating countries could help by ensuring the availability of identification friendly metrics. In any case, the US interstate has authority over interstate migrant labor market participation and should implement more market friendly migrant labor policy to improve trade relations, and to reduce public sector costs.
|
|
||||
|
Re: Mexico May Take Fence Dispute to U.N.
Quote:
__________________
![]() The universe grows smaller every day and the threat of aggression by any group anywhere can no longer be tolerated. There must be security for all or no one is secure... - Klaatu |
|
|||
|
Re: Mexico May Take Fence Dispute to U.N.
What kinds of conditions are you talking about? How does being able to raise revenue from more efficient public policy detract from having more identification friendly metrics on migrant labor market participants? It seems, to me, that border security would be better enforced if we had better relations with our next door trading partners.
|
|
|||
|
Re: Mexico May Take Fence Dispute to U.N.
Labor market participation would be my guess. Why else would black market labor participants be willing to pay one thousand five hundred dollars (for a conduit to the black markets) , or more, if not for the opportunity recover their costs and then some. It seems that the public sector could be generating that revenue with more market friendly public policy rather than to allow the black market to generate that revenue due to less effecient command economics.
|
|
|||
|
Re: Mexico May Take Fence Dispute to U.N.
Quote:
Again, you didn't answer the question & it was your original statement. We have a 4,000 mile border with Mexico. Building fences doesn't work. Just drive down to El Paso, & you can see gaping holes in the fences that are already there. If someone really wants into a country, they're going to get in eventually. What we need is more patrol, national guard & electronic surveillance. And we need a more friendly attitude & easier access to visas for Mexicans to come into this country to work legally. That would dramactically reduce the problem. |
|
||||
|
Re: Mexico May Take Fence Dispute to U.N.
Quote:
__________________
![]() The universe grows smaller every day and the threat of aggression by any group anywhere can no longer be tolerated. There must be security for all or no one is secure... - Klaatu |
|
||||
|
Re: Mexico May Take Fence Dispute to U.N.
Quote:
I agree that a physical barrier is not the magic fix. But until we combine physical barriers (where appropriate) with adequate electronic and human surveillance and interdiction, all other talk of immigration reform is just blowing smoke. Matt
__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum |
|
||||
|
Re: Mexico May Take Fence Dispute to U.N.
Quote:
Who the fuck does Fox think he is telling us what we can and cant build on our soil?
__________________
America’s political correctness is a disease that will bring down our once fine nation. |
|
||||
|
Re: Mexico May Take Fence Dispute to U.N.
Quote:
__________________
Diplomacy is the art of letting someone else get your way. "There is no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation" - Pierre Trudeau “No one is more enslaved than a slave who doesn't think they're enslaved.” - Kate Beckinsale |
|
|||
|
Re: Mexico May Take Fence Dispute to U.N.
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Re: Mexico May Take Fence Dispute to U.N.
Quote:
Mexico can't issue work permits for the US, and the problem is inside Mexico not the US.
__________________
![]() The universe grows smaller every day and the threat of aggression by any group anywhere can no longer be tolerated. There must be security for all or no one is secure... - Klaatu Last edited by Crystal; 11-24-2006 at 11:54 AM. |
|
||||
|
Re: Mexico May Take Fence Dispute to U.N.
@ daniel,
Sorry it has taken so long for me to get my response to you regarding how much enforcing laws to make the illegal immigrant problem go away. I formerly had quite a few sources that showed estimates for costs on simply enforcing the law, but I've apparently lost many of them...here is one of them that I've been able to find. http://www.cis.org/articles/2006/back406.html "It puts enforcement costs for such a plan at about $2 billion, or $400 million per year – an increase of less than 1 percent of the President’s 2007 budget request for the Department of Homeland Security ($42.7 billion)." One simple measure along with any of it could be to require businesses to make a toll free call to the Social Security Admin. to match the SS numbers. BTW, I think you have quite an inside-out outlook on how legislation should be handled in the US. Just because it makes us money does not mean it supercedes our sovereignty being trampled on. |
|
|||
|
Re: Mexico May Take Fence Dispute to U.N.
What do you think of Mexico asking the UN for assistance with infrastructure development? Any labor used to build roads, bridges, Hoover Dams, etc. would be unavailable for participation in the US market for labor.
Last edited by Crystal; 11-24-2006 at 11:55 AM. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|