However, a driver's license (also a local permit to allow certain behavior) from OH is recognized in CA.

The parade permit analogy fails because it necessarily includes a specific geographic location.

Matt

__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum

Parade permit was the first thing that came to mind.

Wouldn't the prohibition of drivers' licenses from being valid across state lines impact interstate commerce, and thus be a violation of the Constitution? CCWs hardly qualify as commerce.

__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears

Since its impossible for Obama to ban concealed carry anyway, then I see no reason why you all shouldnt vote for him.

__________________

It all comes down to this on election day: Are you a racist, or do you look down on spastics?

I'll make sure I give that the weight it deserves on election day.

That is to say, your recommendation won't have any effect on my vote (as I would expect mine would have none on yours if I were so crass as to offer one).

Matt

__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum

However, the requirement to recognize, say, a marriage license, comes from the Full Faith and Credit clause.

Matt

__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum

Do you have any idea how much I'd spend on guns if I could buy in other states?

Why is it legal for me to buy in my state, but 10 miles away in another state, I can't buy the same legal product?

__________________
"Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves." ~ Lord Byron

Once he loads the SCOTUS with libs that make Ginzberg look like Scalia he can do whatever he wants.

Bad as he would fuck everything else up, ruining the Court would be the worst as it carries on long after his four years.

__________________
Hope is the opposite of audacity. It's passive, an excuse for inaction.

Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

“What's the difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama?”

“One is a well turned-out, good-looking, and let's be honest, pretty sexy piece of eye-candy.

“The other kills her own food.”

"shall not be infringed"

I have no answer for you...

__________________
Hope is the opposite of audacity. It's passive, an excuse for inaction.

Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

“What's the difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama?”

“One is a well turned-out, good-looking, and let's be honest, pretty sexy piece of eye-candy.

“The other kills her own food.”

Hey Ill buy your vote for 10 bucks and a new Wunderbaum for your truck!

__________________

It all comes down to this on election day: Are you a racist, or do you look down on spastics?

When you actually analyze the texture of the 2nd ammendment its nothing but vague bullshit - I mean it doesnt hold water.

Some folks in here still dont believe that its possible to ban handguns and the socalled right to carry them, but lets see what happens when Obama change the supreme court judges out with liberals.

__________________

It all comes down to this on election day: Are you a racist, or do you look down on spastics?

States must regocnize driver's licenses from other states due to the Full Faith and Credit clauses of the Constitution.
So, why not CCW licenses?

__________________

Here's a term you might want to educate yourself on: Stare Decisis.

While you're at it, you might consider that the USSC struck down DC's handgun ban. Your oft-repeated claim that it is possible to have a lawful blanket ban on handguns fails the reality test.

There's nothing vague about the wording of the Second Amendment - it's very clear. There have been attempts to confuse the meaning by dwelling on the irrelevant militia clause, but the Court has settled that.

Matt

__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum

The focius now will be what constitutes an 'infringement'.

One has to wonder:
If you had to wait 3-5-7-10 days for an abortion...
If you had to get a license to have an abortion...
If you had to report your abortion to the government...
...would your right to an abortion be infringed?

__________________

Irrelevant, as abortion is not a specifically enumerated, protected right.

But...

If you had to wait 3-5-7-10 days to assemble; or
If you had to get a special permit to be free of unreasonable search; or
If you could only have a 3x5 card to publish a newspaper....

Matt

__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum

Yes. All of those would be considered by the anti-gun left to be an infringement.
But for guns, its different.

__________________