Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Gun Rights and Security Issues

Gun Rights and Security Issues Gun Control, Crime, Drugs, Defence, Homeland Security, Immigration, Law Enforcement

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 10-12-2008
Tanngrisnir3's Avatar
Tanngrisnir3 Tanngrisnir3 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,604

California     United_States

Re: Guerilla warfare against a superpower

Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
But isn't that the Swiss defense plan?
They have universal military service with every able bodied male in the reserves and receiving some military training. Which gives them a professional full time military of a few thousand instructors, and hundreds of thousands of reservists.
The whole thing provides a strong defense, with no ability to project force anywhere else in the world, and it's very cost effective.
Their only "foreign" deployment is the Swiss Guard that protects the Pope.
Yes. Part of my Family is Swiss, and I have spent a lot of time there. I still remember the first time I was there, in my teens, and went to the bathroom in my half-brother's parent's appt. Three loaded assault rifles leaned up in the corners, cleaned and ready to go. It was no biggie for them, but I was surprised (and I thought it was pretty cool, too)

Every bridge into the country is mined, as is every major pass, and every able-bodied male serves, period, and is called back once a year for a brief period of service. They have (not so) secret airbases hidden deeply in the mountains, etc....

IOW, that country is ready to go at the drop of a hat, and woe be to anyone stupid enough to invade.
__________________
All things serve The Beam
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2008
Spadplanter's Avatar
Spadplanter Spadplanter is offline
Temporally Band

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Heaven
Posts: 8,689

United_States     Colorado

Re: If Obama wins............

Oh God, I hoped that this discussion would never come up again. An assault rifle is, by definition, a select-fire weapon, switchable from single shot per pull of the trigger to fully automatic, continuous fire, at the desire of the user. A semi-auto like an AR-15 is no more an assault weapon than a revolver, each only firing one shot per pull of the trigger.

Is there any way that this discussion can be started from a position of truth rather than a position of emotion?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2008
SomeMarine SomeMarine is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 892

   
Re: If Obama wins............

Quote:
Originally Posted by pramjockey View Post
Really?

That surprises me. Is this something you discussed in your time in the service?
I am not out of service, and the vast majority of Infantry/mech ( tank ) guys guys, at least in the Corps, would have no part in helping take freedoms away from American citizens. And the Infantry/mech ( tank ) guys are the ones you want on your side. And yes, it has been discussed many times on nights spent in the barracks drinking beers.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2008
SomeMarine SomeMarine is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 892

   
Re: If Obama wins............

Quote:
Originally Posted by TSGracchus View Post
I would hope that would be true, but wouldn't count on it. Our professional military has become a separate subculture and is no longer an army of citizen-soldiers.

However, if they did, then arms in private ownership would be redundant, and if they didn't, then arms in private ownership would be useless.
You can't possibly be serious. The vast majority of service guys are dudes that get bored, join up, spend 4 years in, then go to college and smoke dope. There is no seperate sub-culture. We are your friends, neighbors, cousins, brothers, and sisters.

You would still need privatly owned firearms, because parts would be hard to come by. The only useless firearm is one not loaded and in use.
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2008
SomeMarine SomeMarine is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 892

   
Re: If Obama wins............

Quote:
Originally Posted by TSGracchus View Post
Depending on who's giving the orders and exactly what the orders are, it's not impossible at all that our soldiers might obey orders to overthrow the Constitution and create a military dictatorship, especially if the order came not from some general but from the president.

Have to be the right president, though. I doubt Obama could pull it off. McCain might be able to.
Um, no. Every Marine I know would die fighting that. Good try though.
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2008
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,962

   
Re: If Obama wins............

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wallaroo View Post
No offence gunney, but am I wrong assuming...
Yes, you are.

The again, you're wrong about most things...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2008
Chocobot's Avatar
Chocobot Chocobot is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,986

   
Re: If Obama wins............

it would need to be an argument over the constitution to get you americans to fight each other. would marine's take action against the citizens in this case? dont see why not. theyd be split right down the middle i suspect.

i think of new orleans during katrina. all the cops were pointing guns at the citizens, and had to be told to lower them. not much sense of common humanity was evident between gun holders and the rest.
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2008
chassisman's Avatar
chassisman chassisman is offline
Secretary of State
poof! you're gone (2)

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: bible belt
Posts: 8,286

United_States     Texas

Re: If Obama wins............

This just in..............I decided to go on thee hunt for some cases of 7.62 x 39 , and guess what? Damned stuff is out of stock (wholesale)
Whatcha figure is up with that? Must be more of my "price paranoia".
__________________
Mr. Obama, please release the UFO files!
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2008
X Man's Avatar
X Man X Man is offline
Lieutenant Governor

 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 421

United_States     Earth

Re: If Obama wins............

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spadplanter View Post
Oh God, I hoped that this discussion would never come up again. An assault rifle is, by definition, a select-fire weapon, switchable from single shot per pull of the trigger to fully automatic, continuous fire, at the desire of the user. A semi-auto like an AR-15 is no more an assault weapon than a revolver, each only firing one shot per pull of the trigger.

Is there any way that this discussion can be started from a position of truth rather than a position of emotion?
No, facts aren't welcome in a gun-ban debate, by either side. Sorry.

Of course you're correct, but I can defend myself with guns that aren't black and menacing. I can blow away 2-3 assailants at a time with a short shotgun with a wooden stock just as easily as a black plastic clad one with a pistol grip. So, who cares? There are more guns in this country than people anyways, they aren't going away. Ever.

Regards,
Mike
__________________
†ØØ MÅN¥ ßËË®§
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2008
pramjockey's Avatar
pramjockey pramjockey is offline
OMG!
Scruffy-looking nerf herder

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 14,157

Scotland     Colorado

Re: If Obama wins............

Quote:
Originally Posted by chassisman View Post
This just in..............I decided to go on thee hunt for some cases of 7.62 x 39 , and guess what? Damned stuff is out of stock (wholesale)
Whatcha figure is up with that? Must be more of my "price paranoia".
Sounds like a chickenshit way of advocating armed insurrection. Of course, no Republican would admit to not putting "country first," right?

__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 10-24-2008
Mick Jagger's Avatar
Mick Jagger Mick Jagger is offline
County Executive

 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 369

   
Re: If Obama wins............

The Heller opinion was blatant judicial activism. The object of the Second Amendment was to remove "all room for doubt or uneasiness upon the subject" "that Congress should neglect to provide for" arming the militia.
The convention of Virginia...proposed the following amendment to the constitution; "that each state respectively should have the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining it's own militia, whenever congress should neglect to provide for the same"... all room for doubt, or uneasiness upon the subject, seems to be completely removed, by the fourth article of amendments to the constitution, since ratified, viz. "That a militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep, and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

--Saint George Tucker; commenting on Article 1 - Section 8 - Clause 12 of the U. S. Constitution; 1803
**********************

St. George Tucker, Blackstone's Commentaries 1:App. 272--75
The objects of this clause of the constitution, although founded upon the principle of our state bill of rights, Art. 8, declaring, "that a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defence of a free state," were thought to be dangerous to the state governments. The convention of Virginia, therefore, proposed the following amendment to the constitution; "that each state respectively should have the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining it's own militia, whenever congress should neglect to provide for the same." . . . A further amendment proposed, was, "that the militia should not be subject to martial law, except when in actual service, in time of war, rebellion, or invasion." . . . A provision manifestly implied in the words of the constitution. As to the former of these amendments, all room for doubt, or uneasiness upon the subject, seems to be completely removed, by the fourth article of amendments to the constitution, since ratified, viz. "That a militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep, and bear arms, shall not be infringed." . . . To which we may add, that the power of arming the militia, not being prohibited to the states, respectively, by the constitution, is, consequently, reserved to them, concurrently with the federal government. In pursuance of these powers, an act passed, 2 Cong. 1 Sess. c. 33, to provide for the national defence, by establishing an uniform militia throughout the United States; and the system of organization thereby established, has been carried into effect in Virginia, and probably in all the other states of the union.

--Saint George Tucker; commenting on Article 1 - Section 8 - Clause 12 of the U. S. Constitution; 1803
*******************

Saint George Tucker was acknowledged as the finest legal mind in Virginia during the early days of the Republic. He was a personal friend and political ally of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. Tucker held the most respected law school position in Virginia and James Madison made him a U. S. District Judge. He is considered to be the foremost expositor of Jeffersonian Republicanism.
__________________
I find it appalling that Justice Antonin Scala, in his dissenting opinion in McCreary County v. ACLU, constructed his model of "the relationship between church and state" in America without even considering the actual text of the Constitution. How do incompetents like him get on the U. S. Supreme Court?
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2008
SomeMarine SomeMarine is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 892

   
Re: If Obama wins............

Quote:
Originally Posted by X Man View Post
No, facts aren't welcome in a gun-ban debate, by either side. Sorry.

Of course you're correct, but I can defend myself with guns that aren't black and menacing. I can blow away 2-3 assailants at a time with a short shotgun with a wooden stock just as easily as a black plastic clad one with a pistol grip. So, who cares? There are more guns in this country than people anyways, they aren't going away. Ever.

Regards,
Mike
Yep, ban semi-auto's, and people would just switch to a bolt action Remington 700, and blast at oppressors from 600- 1000 meters.

Action, reaction.

If a ban ever happened, this country has an abundance of machinists that would turn out what people wanted

Ban guns, and some folks still remember how to set up dragon's tongue ambushes. .

Ban the diesel fuel that requires, and pitfalls still work.

Ban shovels, and hit and runs with vehicles still kill you dead.

Sling shots are a bitch.

Bow and arrows are still deadly out to a hundred meters.

There are many more dastardly things folks involved in a revolution/revolt could do to get their point across, but I won't get into those.
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2008
California Girl's Avatar
California Girl California Girl is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
My bite is worst than my bark

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Where there is trouble, I am there!
Posts: 1,622

United_States     California

Re: If Obama wins............

Quote:
Originally Posted by TSGracchus View Post
I would hope that would be true, but wouldn't count on it. Our professional military has become a separate subculture and is no longer an army of citizen-soldiers.

However, if they did, then arms in private ownership would be redundant, and if they didn't, then arms in private ownership would be useless.
Where do you get your information from?

Subculture my ass. Our military are us, they are not separate. My family are pretty much Marines to a man and I see absolutely no evidence of them being anything other than (slightly scary) normal guys. They just happen to be a lot tougher than most but to call them a subculture is naive and stupid.

They do a hard job, and, for the most part, they do it incredibly well.
__________________
"On my signal, unleash hell."
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2008
chassisman's Avatar
chassisman chassisman is offline
Secretary of State
poof! you're gone (2)

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: bible belt
Posts: 8,286

United_States     Texas

Re: If Obama wins............

I have to jump in and note that "the media" is claiming that gun sales are up over 10% this year. I wonder if any other industry is experiencing an across the board sales increase like that.
__________________
Mr. Obama, please release the UFO files!
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2008
California Girl's Avatar
California Girl California Girl is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
My bite is worst than my bark

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Where there is trouble, I am there!
Posts: 1,622

United_States     California

Re: If Obama wins............

Quote:
Originally Posted by chassisman View Post
I have to jump in and note that "the media" is claiming that gun sales are up over 10% this year. I wonder if any other industry is experiencing an across the board sales increase like that.
Nice to see that sector doing well, despite the 'downturn'....

Are we planning another revolution? If so, why have I not been invited... If they have a revolution without me, I will be really cross and heads are gonna roll. (rolling heads!)
__________________
"On my signal, unleash hell."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online