Same here - I think it ultimately comes down to the person's body chemistry. The time dilation effect can make it seem to last longer, but i don't think there's any proof of that either.

__________________
In case you were wondering, yes, there really ARE more idiots these days....technology has made natural selection obsolete.

Silence is golden...Duct tape is silver.

For me it definitely feels better, and i do last a bit longer. Nothing too significant but nothing to sneeze at either. The girlfriend says she gets off better when we are both stoned and having sex, and i'm not really one to argue.

And whether legal or not, I am all for drug testing at work. Zero tolerance for THC and its metabolites and zero tolerance for any other drug, legal or not.

That was WAY more information than i needed

__________________
In case you were wondering, yes, there really ARE more idiots these days....technology has made natural selection obsolete.

Silence is golden...Duct tape is silver.

So you'd test to see if people, for example, have wine with their dinner the night before? Or if they took Tylenol?

How about impairment testing, it is far more effective, less costly and less intrusive.

Here are some stats.
NWI Impairment Testing

Link please...

__________________



For those who have fought to defend it, freedom has a taste the protected will never know...



If it wasn't for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all...

You'll notice I said "a law", and not "marijuana laws".

If you don't "recognize" laws which prohibit you from, say, stealing the possessions of another, should you be allowed to steal someone else's possessions?

See, if you weren't baked outta' yer mind right now, you'd have seen that comin'...

__________________



For those who have fought to defend it, freedom has a taste the protected will never know...



If it wasn't for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all...

When it comes to defending your dope, you folks have absolutely no sense of humor.

Not all laws are created equal.

"Allowed" by whom? If I don't recognize the law against stealing as valid within my own ethical framework, then the only thing that matters is whether or not I get caught. Even if I didn't find stealing to be morally wrong, I probably wouldn't, say, break into my neighbor's house and help myself to a television because the likelihood of getting caught and the severity of the punishment would make that not worth doing. Smoking pot or double parking, on the other hand, carry inconsequential enough punishments and low enough likelihoods of getting caught that I would simply do it anyway.

Of course, I wouldn't steal because I find it morally wrong. I don't smoke pot because I don't like it. I would double park, though. There's nothing that I do or don't do because of the law, in terms of morals. I don't view breaking the law as immoral or obeying it as moral - I view the law as morally neutral. When the law doesn't line up with my ethics (which, by and large it does), then all that matters is whether or not I will get caught and, if I do, how severe the punishment will be.

__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson

Are these posts sarcastic/tongue-in-cheek? Or are you suggesting that we create government jobs for the sake of employing people and nothing else?

too bad nazism collapsed, you would have thrived so well.

__________________

apparently, you don't live in GA.

__________________

I tried looking it up a recent case but could not find it. Just last year there was a news story of police raiding a man who was growing cannabis. The moment he pleaded religious use, the judge decided that the warrant was not properly signed or filled out and the case was thrown out. Could be more than a coincidence. Also the "THC ministry" claims that they have had 41 successes with a religious use defense, but they did not source their evidence. But I am absolutely sure about that first one.

As for myself I could argue in court using scientific evidence that the anointing oil of the old and new testament contained cannabis.

Oh I loved that series. Marijuana is one of the few illegal drugs that got made that way primarily through racism towards Mexicans(or would that be nationalism?) Oh and Ecstasy was made illegal because a few people influential people wanted it to be illegal. Even Congress didn't care about that one.

__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004