Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Gun Rights and Security Issues Gun Control, Crime, Drugs, Defence, Homeland Security, Immigration, Law Enforcement |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Re: CA: thumbprints and personal info needed in 2011 to buy ammo.
Would anyone here who supports gun control have any problem with their pro-gun neighbors putting this sign up on their front lawn:
__________________
"It's a good feeling to shoot a bad guy. Something you democrats would never understand. Americans are homesteaders, we want a safe home, keep the money we make, and shoot bad guys!" ----Denny Crane |
|
||||
|
Re: CA: thumbprints and personal info needed in 2011 to buy ammo.
All kidding aside, CA residents must enjoy state oppression, they seem to have plenty of it and sign in plenty more on an annual basis.
__________________
|
|
|||
|
Re: CA: thumbprints and personal info needed in 2011 to buy ammo.
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Re: CA: thumbprints and personal info needed in 2011 to buy ammo.
Repressive and abusive is definetly how I'd describe Republicans. Just look at how they sign laws that force undue burden upon law abiding citizens.
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush "I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006 "[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004 |
|
|||
|
Re: CA: thumbprints and personal info needed in 2011 to buy ammo.
Quote:
don't be a dick dude. |
|
||||
|
Re: CA: thumbprints and personal info needed in 2011 to buy ammo.
Quote:
Governor capable of using veto You're just a right wing partisan who can't grasp the fact that if the Republican governor of California didn't want the residents to live under such oppresive laws he could have vetoed the legislation. Clearly you are not a person who thinks people should be held accountable.
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush "I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006 "[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004 |
|
|||
|
Re: CA: thumbprints and personal info needed in 2011 to buy ammo.
Quote:
I never said he wasn't capable of using his veto power. Just that he probably didn't feel like getting his veto shoved up his ass by the legislature of liberals who passed the bill in the first place. The amiano bill hardly had the support that this one did. |
|
||||
|
Re: CA: thumbprints and personal info needed in 2011 to buy ammo.
Quote:
Had Arnold vetoed the bill and had his veto overridden then he could have claimed that he was trying to stop the loony left but there just aren't enough Republicans in the legislature to put a stop to the leftist agenda. This would have rallied the righties and enthused the Republicans in the state. Instead this is just more proof that it's the Republicans who need to be out of power to punish them for the ineffective leadership and complete incompetence.
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush "I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006 "[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004 |
|
|||
|
Re: CA: thumbprints and personal info needed in 2011 to buy ammo.
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Re: CA: thumbprints and personal info needed in 2011 to buy ammo.
Quote:
Youre a loony. And don't call me sycophantic dude it really makes you resemble a horse's ass |
|
||||
|
Re: CA: thumbprints and personal info needed in 2011 to buy ammo.
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Re: CA: thumbprints and personal info needed in 2011 to buy ammo.
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Re: CA: thumbprints and personal info needed in 2011 to buy ammo.
What part of "A well-regulated militia being necessary..." do YOU not understand? It's clearly meant to to be seen as a precondition, that's why it was written first, and note the world is "being", not, "since a militia might be required" and certainly not "so our citizens can murder us if they should disagree with our policies sufficiently"
__________________
Alizee Jacotay, the reason god invented hips |
|
|||
|
Re: CA: thumbprints and personal info needed in 2011 to buy ammo.
Quote:
The phrase "well regulated" was inserted so as not to appear to undercut the clear division of authority for training and creating uniform standards for the militia when it was called forth. Finally, since you seem oblivious to history, the militia (aka all able bodied men) were seen NOT just as neccesary to the security of a free state from EXTERNAL threats, but also to the INTERNAL threat of despotism (you may recall that the same people who wrote, and ratified these words had just revolted against THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT). As for it coming first, that does not indicate priority by any grammatical standard. What DOES connotate emphasis and priority grammatically is the fact that the initial phrase is what one who is educated in the language would refer to as a dependent clause, followed by an independent clause. Guess which one can stand on its own, independent of the other.
__________________
"It's a good feeling to shoot a bad guy. Something you democrats would never understand. Americans are homesteaders, we want a safe home, keep the money we make, and shoot bad guys!" ----Denny Crane Last edited by Marcus1124; 3 Weeks Ago at 09:02 PM. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|