Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Health Care
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Health Care A forum for discussing the US health care debate and proposals. All threads on this subject shall be posted here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #241 (permalink)  
Old 07-06-2009
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,817

   
Re: A Question For Supporters Of Government Run Healthcare...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocobot View Post
Hospitals, being big, well appointed close to motorways and in central locations would make excellent distribution centres for post office delivery.
and the current postoffices that are in EVERY CITY/town/county etc. are what? chopped liver?

Hospitals should concentrate their space and resources on fixing people, not on delivering or receiving mail. what if some jack ass put an anthrax bomb into the slot? boom lots of dead people. or a conventional bomb? booom lots of dead people. or and incendiary device? booom lots of dead people on fire.
plus youre out a swanky rather expensive research hospital. its like putting up a sign that says PLEASE TERRORISTS ATTACK HERE ITS EVER SO EASY
Reply With Quote
  #242 (permalink)  
Old 07-06-2009
Chocobot's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,049

   
Re: A Question For Supporters Of Government Run Healthcare...

Quote:
Originally Posted by reality View Post
and the current postoffices that are in EVERY CITY/town/county etc. are what? chopped liver?

Hospitals should concentrate their space and resources on fixing people, not on delivering or receiving mail. what if some jack ass put an anthrax bomb into the slot? boom lots of dead people. or a conventional bomb? booom lots of dead people. or and incendiary device? booom lots of dead people on fire.
plus youre out a swanky rather expensive research hospital. its like putting up a sign that says PLEASE TERRORISTS ATTACK HERE ITS EVER SO EASY
Theyre excellent sites for care in community.
__________________
Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if Labor had not first existed. Labor is superior to capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.

Guess who?
Reply With Quote
  #243 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2009
Swoop187's Avatar
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,193

United_States     Italy

Re: A Question For Supporters Of Government Run Healthcare...

Liberals have no concept of money, 3.5 trillon to them might as well be 21 figures. Doesn't matter, never did, never does.

.50 cents in the homeless guys cup is the same as 3.5 trillion.

To put it into some kind of sense a moron could relate to, it would take 22,500 years to actually count to 3.5 trillion. Now for all the smart and educated folks where were we 22,500 years ago? the wheel? nope, try wooden tools like spears.
__________________
Sic Semper Tyrannis






http://www.myspace.com/swoop187muzic
Reply With Quote
  #244 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2009
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: US, California - federalist
Posts: 5,330

   
Re: A Question For Supporters Of Government Run Healthcare...

You may want to mention it to the "charge and spend" republicans who keep complaining about tax and spend democrats.
Reply With Quote
  #245 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2009
Rude Boy's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
The Most Interesting Man In The World

 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: On the left end of the spectrum
Posts: 1,420

Texas     France

Re: A Question For Supporters Of Government Run Healthcare...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swoop187 View Post
Liberals have no concept of money, 3.5 trillon to them might as well be 21 figures. Doesn't matter, never did, never does.

.50 cents in the homeless guys cup is the same as 3.5 trillion.

To put it into some kind of sense a moron could relate to, it would take 22,500 years to actually count to 3.5 trillion. Now for all the smart and educated folks where were we 22,500 years ago? the wheel? nope, try wooden tools like spears.
Waging two wars and attempting to start another while cutting taxes for the wealthiest Americans is what's moronic.

But, I digress ... when Republican's spend money killing people in war, it's good. When someone advocates spending a fraction of the Pentagon's budget to heal the sick, it's that we have "no concept of money."

Fucking moronic, indeed.
Reply With Quote
  #246 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2009
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,817

   
Re: A Question For Supporters Of Government Run Healthcare...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocobot View Post
Theyre excellent sites for care in community.
yes the swanky research hospitals with lots of nifty science labs etc would be.

redundent post offices? not so much
Reply With Quote
  #247 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2009
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: US, California - federalist
Posts: 5,330

   
Re: A Question For Supporters Of Government Run Healthcare...

It may not be redundant if provided by the federal government. It could be considered a consolidation of services. I was being facetious in claiming that a post research hospital is fully compliant with post infrastructure that enables the public sector business venture of post offices.
Reply With Quote
  #248 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2009
Chocobot's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,049

   
Re: A Question For Supporters Of Government Run Healthcare...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swoop187 View Post
Liberals have no concept of money, 3.5 trillon to them might as well be 21 figures. Doesn't matter, never did, never does.

.50 cents in the homeless guys cup is the same as 3.5 trillion.

To put it into some kind of sense a moron could relate to, it would take 22,500 years to actually count to 3.5 trillion. Now for all the smart and educated folks where were we 22,500 years ago? the wheel? nope, try wooden tools like spears.
Idiotic statement. Please take the doobie out your mouth,
__________________
Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if Labor had not first existed. Labor is superior to capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.

Guess who?
Reply With Quote
  #249 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2009
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: US, California - federalist
Posts: 5,330

   
Re: A Question For Supporters Of Government Run Healthcare...

I think we can use a federal research hospital in every state and that is interconnected by fiber optics and a dedicated supercomputer for that system. By acquiring more perfect knowledge of infirmities, we can find cures in a more cost effective manner.

It could also function as another resource in our public health care system that both promotes and provides for the common defense and general welfare of the republic.
Reply With Quote
  #250 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2009
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: US, California - federalist
Posts: 5,330

   
Re: A Question For Supporters Of Government Run Healthcare...

Do we really need the expense of the wars on drugs and terror?

I think we can use a federal research hospital in every state and that is interconnected by fiber optics and a dedicated supercomputer for that system. By acquiring more perfect knowledge of infirmities, we can find cures in a more cost effective manner.

It could also function as another resource in our public health care system that both promotes and provides for the common defense and general welfare of the republic.
Reply With Quote
  #251 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2009
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,623

United_States     Ohio

Re: A Question For Supporters Of Government Run Healthcare...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocobot View Post
Idiotic statement. Please take the doobie out your mouth,
From where I sit, his statement was right on point.
Reply With Quote
  #252 (permalink)  
Old 08-16-2009
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: US, California - federalist
Posts: 5,330

   
Re: A Question For Supporters Of Government Run Healthcare...

Do we really need the expense of the wars on drugs and terror?

I think we can use a federal research hospital in every state and that is interconnected by fiber optics and a dedicated supercomputer for that system. By acquiring more perfect knowledge of infirmities, we can find cures in a more cost effective manner.

It could also function as another resource in our public health care system that both promotes and provides for the common defense and general welfare of the republic.
Reply With Quote
  #253 (permalink)  
Old 08-16-2009
redrover's Avatar
County Council Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2009
Location: Greece NY
Posts: 313

   
Re: A Question For Supporters Of Government Run Healthcare...

I think the government does a good job of running the military, Social Security and medicare. Insurance companies are the villains.
Reply With Quote
  #254 (permalink)  
Old 08-16-2009
County Executive

 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 372

   
Re: A Question For Supporters Of Government Run Healthcare...

How is it that other countries manage on much smaller military budgets?

The US is the most liberal-splurging country I know of. Conservative in many wayw, but quite liberal when it comes to funding the military and using it liberally all over the world.
Reply With Quote
  #255 (permalink)  
Old 08-16-2009
Lieutenant Governor

 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 433

   
Re: A Question For Supporters Of Government Run Healthcare...

The government does quite a respectable job of hiring compentent police, fire fighters, armed forces...

I have no personal experience with the government's current health insurance, eg medicare. But seniors sure seem to get up in arms if you want to throw them back onto the private market. Apparently they prefer it to private insurance despite their 65 years of personal experience with private insurance.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online