Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Health Care
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Health Care A forum for discussing the US health care debate and proposals. All threads on this subject shall be posted here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2010
Commodore's Avatar
Secretary of State
Nationalist

 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 4,590

New_York     Earth

The Slaughter Solution

Quote:
Originally Posted by Article 1, Section 7
All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other Bills.

Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a law, be presented to the President of the United States: If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively. If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law

Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill.
Keep the above in mind when reading the following.

House Democrats looking at 'Slaughter Solution' to pass Obamacare without a vote on Senate bill

Quote:
Would House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her fellow House Democratic leaders try to cram the Senate version of Obamacare through the House without actually having a recorded vote on the bill?

Not only is the answer yes, they would, they have figured out a way to do it, according to National Journal's Congress Daily:

"House Rules Chairwoman Louise Slaughter is prepping to help usher the healthcare overhaul through the House and potentially avoid a direct vote on the Senate overhaul bill, the chairwoman said Tuesday.

"Slaughter is weighing preparing a rule that would consider the Senate bill passed once the House approves a corrections bill that would make changes to the Senate version.

"Slaughter has not taken the plan to Speaker Pelosi as Democrats await CBO scores on the corrections bill. 'Once the CBO gives us the score, we'll spring right on it,' she said."


Each bill that comes before the House for a vote on final passage must be given a rule that determines things like whether the minority would be able to offer amendments to it from the floor.

In the Slaughter Solution, the rule would declare that the House "deems" the Senate version of Obamacare to have been passed by the House. House members would still have to vote on whether to accept the rule, but they would then be able to say they only voted for a rule, not for the bill itself.

Would that rationale fly with the public? Is it logical? Of course not. But remember, these folks have persuaded themselves that a majority of the American people really want Obamacare. A blog post on House Minority Leader John Boehner's blog described the approach as a "twisted scheme."
I hope people realize that if such blatantly unconstitutional steps come to pass, We, the people, will have very few options, none of them pleasant. If these tyrrants are willing to do it once, they will do it again.
__________________
January 21, 2013: The End of an ERROR.

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."
"The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself."
---Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2010
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 25,738

United_States    
Re: The Slaughter Solution

no, thats so friggin obviously retarded and underhanded ( thats why pelosi likes it I bet) , and the senate parliamentarian said yesterday the bill, that is the senate bill must be passed, as in voted up or donw, any stings there after are an illusion and carry no weight, you cannot say I approve the bill for signing if tjhe BILL itself has not 'passed' and is then ready for a presidents sig...they are grasping at straws and shows you how desperate they are.

and obama delayed his vacation, sorry trip to Micronesia et al 3 days for his?
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."

Bis interimitur qui suis armis perit...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2010
Doc Marten's Avatar
Town Council Member
Brewer, Patriot, Classical Liberal

 
Member Since: Feb 2010
Location: People's Republic of Wisconsin
Posts: 116

Wisconsin     United_States

Re: The Slaughter Solution

Heh, the Slaughter House is what will happen if this passes, or at least should be. I do not know if anyone cares anymore to be honest. The US has proven itself to be quite lazy and accepting of things lately.
__________________

"In capitalism, man exploits man. In communism, it's the other way around." -John Kenneth Galbraith
"He is not wise to me who is wise in words only, but he who is wise in deeds." - St. Gregory of Nyssa
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2010
Danny's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 4,363

Canada     United_States

Re: The Slaughter Solution

I thought the slaughter rule would be to not pass anything and watch another 44,000 people die preventable deaths every year.

But as for the rule, if there is a way to do it then they should do it. The filibuster had been abused more than a cheap hooker and has essentially become the rule. So If the Republicans think they can bend the rules in such a fashion then they should expect the Dems to use every loophole they can find right back at them.
__________________
Liberals got women the right to vote. Liberals got blacks the right to vote. Liberals created Social Security. Liberals ended segregation. Liberals passed the Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act. Liberals created Medicare. Liberals passed the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act. What did Conservatives do? They opposed them on every one of those things. They opposed health care reform but failed. Keep up the good work guys.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2010
Commodore's Avatar
Secretary of State
Nationalist

 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 4,590

New_York     Earth

Re: The Slaughter Solution

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny View Post
I thought the slaughter rule would be to not pass anything and watch another 44,000 people die preventable deaths every year.

But as for the rule, if there is a way to do it then they should do it. The filibuster had been abused more than a cheap hooker and has essentially become the rule. So If the Republicans think they can bend the rules in such a fashion then they should expect the Dems to use every loophole they can find right back at them.
Except for the whole unconstitutional thing.
__________________
January 21, 2013: The End of an ERROR.

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."
"The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself."
---Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2010
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 25,738

United_States    
Re: The Slaughter Solution

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny View Post
I thought the slaughter rule would be to not pass anything and watch another 44,000 people die preventable deaths every year.

But as for the rule, if there is a way to do it then they should do it. The filibuster had been abused more than a cheap hooker and has essentially become the rule. So If the Republicans think they can bend the rules in such a fashion then they should expect the Dems to use every loophole they can find right back at them.
the slaughter plan is unconstitutional and no amount of he hawing will change that. So frankly your remark as to the filibuster means nothing, they are not comparable.
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."

Bis interimitur qui suis armis perit...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2010
John Drake's Avatar
Vice President
The Last Eisenhower Republican

 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: America
Posts: 6,413

   
Re: The Slaughter Solution

Quote:
House members would still have to vote on whether to accept the rule, but they would then be able to say they only voted for a rule, not for the bill itself.
I don't understand, they still need the same number of votes, don't they, so what does it matter?
__________________
Alizee Jacotay, the reason god invented hips

IT'S ON YOUTUBE, IT MUST BE TRUE
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2010
Commodore's Avatar
Secretary of State
Nationalist

 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 4,590

New_York     Earth

Re: The Slaughter Solution

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Drake View Post
I don't understand, they still need the same number of votes, don't they, so what does it matter?
The rule change would conceivably be easier to swallow, though given what it would allow, not by much.

Either Reid, Pelosi, and Obama haven't figured it out yet, or are resigned to being the Kamikaze Kongress, on faith that like other entitlements, their reforms will survive the political cycle, and they or their successors will one day be at the top again.
__________________
January 21, 2013: The End of an ERROR.

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."
"The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself."
---Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2010
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 3,415

   
Re: The Slaughter Solution

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny View Post
I thought the slaughter rule would be to not pass anything and watch another 44,000 people die preventable deaths every year.
Where's the list of the dead? Surely there would be one. It'd be a great tool to use in passing health care but... no list.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2010
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 25,738

United_States    
Re: The Slaughter Solution

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Drake View Post
I don't understand, they still need the same number of votes, don't they, so what does it matter?

pelosi doesn't have the votes to approve the senate bill , the final bill that if approved by the house would then go to obama for his signature.

She wants changes made but if she changes it then the senate gets another go at it. Amendments, debate, cloture closing debate and a vote, cloture requires 60 votes, not 51.

But she doesn't want them to open the bill again, per se', again because they no longer have 60.

So, she will create a piece of legislation that has all of the changes she wants to the original bill.

Thats what she will have voted on in the house this week, NOT the Senate HC bill.

She will send that legislation to the senate, they will up or down vote on that, 51 needed to pass, in that piece of legislation is a clause that says IF the senate passes this, the house will 'consider' the senate bill passed. BUT there will have been no vote on that bill in the house, no yeas or nays recorded, no chance to vote at all.

She says that then, the senate bill with this attachment will be forwarded to the pres. for signature.

That's not the way it works. Aside from the constitutional rule in post #1 , this also short circuits the senates existence and right to craft the final piece of legislation and precludes any study of changes, possible amendments, or debate any changes the house has created to the final product, which would require they open debate in the senate, then have a cloture vote then send that changed HC bill to the house for approval.THEN it goes to obama. You cannot send a bill to the pres. that has not had a vote recorded for approval.


The Senate parliamentarian has already weighed in, the law precludes the House from passing reconciliation fixes to health-care without first passing the Senate bill. She trying to get around that.....

And NO this has never ever been attempted before, period.

In effect she wants reconciliation before they vote on the bill and her peice of leg. passes, then they don't even vote at all to boot.....in the words of tony from Brooklyn, getdafugouttahere...
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."

Bis interimitur qui suis armis perit...
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2010
SamInTheSouth's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Rock Hill, South Carolina
Posts: 4,255

South_Carolina     United_States

Re: The Slaughter Solution

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny View Post
I thought the slaughter rule would be to not pass anything and watch another 44,000 people die preventable deaths every year.
I thought it was 100,000 that die every year. That's what one of your brethren said. It's getting confusing keeping track of your made up numbers.
__________________
"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic." - Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton April 28th, 2003

Carolina Politics Online

HOPE AND CHANGE
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2010
Vice President
Last of the Timelords

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 7,337

United_States    
Re: The Slaughter Solution

Quote:
Danny
I thought the slaughter rule would be to not pass anything and watch another 44,000 people die preventable deaths every year.

But as for the rule, if there is a way to do it then they should do it. The filibuster had been abused more than a cheap hooker and has essentially become the rule. So If the Republicans think they can bend the rules in such a fashion then they should expect the Dems to use every loophole they can find right back at them.
If the democrats go so far as to simply say the Senate bill has passed without actually voting on it, then quite frankly we have passed the point where armed rebellion is morally justified. That is not democracy by any rational definition.
__________________
"It's a good feeling to shoot a bad guy. Something you democrats would never understand. Americans are homesteaders, we want a safe home, keep the money we make, and shoot bad guys!"

----Denny Crane

Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2010
SamInTheSouth's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Rock Hill, South Carolina
Posts: 4,255

South_Carolina     United_States

Pelosi Plan to Pass Health Care Without Traditional Vote

Quote:
Before Congress can consider the package of changes that many lawmakers want in exchange for their support on the original bill, the House has to first pass the original bill from the Senate side.

Problem is, even with assurances that the package of changes will be considered, many House Democrats don't want to go on record in support of the Senate bill -- what with its sweetheart deals, tax on high-value insurance plans and other controversial provisions.

Enter the Pelosi tactic, known as a "self-executing rule."

Under this tactic, the House could simultaneously approve the Senate version of the bill while voting on the package of changes. This would "deem" the Senate bill passed, though not directly show members voting in favor of passage.

It may sound murky, but the option is winning favor among Democrats.

Pelosi reportedly told liberal bloggers Monday that "nobody wants to vote for the Senate bill," and so she's strongly considering the non-vote vote.

"I like it, because people don't have to vote on the Senate bill," she said.

Fox News
Yet more proof that this bill is the gargantuan piece of crap that it is. If they have to use sleazy tactics like this to pass a bill it's quite clearly not the saving grace they claim it to be. It's another confirmation that the bill is really about the government taking over the health care industry and forcibly exerting more influence over the life of every American. As a matter of fact, it's the way this is being done that is angering Americans more than the bill itself.

I believe what they are attempting is what has been referred to as the "Slaughter Rule." Congressman Thaddeus McCotter (R-MI) was on Pete Kaliner's radio program on WBT Charlotte last night and he said if they pass the bill this way he suspects there will be a multitude of legal challenges filed against it. Let's hope so as this is a bastardization of the way our Congress is supposed to operate.

If they pass this bill using the Slaughter Rule the Democrats will be signing their death warrant in November. While that might make some Republicans happy at the prospect of taking back the Congress, it's a losing situation for Americans because unless this legislation is tossed out by the judiciary it's not likely to be repealed. The Pelosi Congress has made a mockery of our representative republic.
__________________
"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic." - Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton April 28th, 2003

Carolina Politics Online

HOPE AND CHANGE
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2010
MattInFla's Avatar
Administrator, Bulk Rate
Fear my squirrelly wrath!!!!

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 32,626

United_States     Florida

Re: Pelosi Plan to Pass Health Care Without Traditional Vote

What a way to run a legislature. We're going to pretend we voted on it, so we don't have to go on record voting for it.

WTF?

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2010
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 25,738

United_States    
Re: Pelosi Plan to Pass Health Care Without Traditional Vote

I thought we had a thread on this already

anyway, yes but the const. has a very clearly worded statute and this dovetails to matts thread on reconciliation, the bill must be 'passed', first, correctly, votes tabulated etc. then signed INTO law before changes can be made. This isn't an "if/or" decision process, its just more squirming.

Maybe they will threaten to set themselves on fire next if they don't get the votes.
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."

Bis interimitur qui suis armis perit...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online