Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Information and Research > Historical Discourse

Historical Discourse A discussion forum dedicated to history.

Reply
 
LinkBack (3) Thread Tools Display Modes
  1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #181 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2007
Wallaroo's Avatar
Wallaroo Wallaroo is offline
Secretary of Defense
Permanently Banned (you wish)

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 2,448

European_Union    
Re: The moon landing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Analyst View Post
This is not an evidence that MEN have been in the moon. Certainly robots have been there and many kinds of devices installed. I am waiting for explanations - e.g. why it was mentioned that the radiation in the moon was similar as on earth because it was indicated by the detectors the astronauts had with them. This is a complete joke - earth atmosphere and magnetic field prevents 99.9% from the dangerous cosmic radiation to enter the earth, but in the moon there is no such protection. If the astonauts made this discovery, it shows that they have never been in the moon. Why the had helmets - maybe they could have been there without them, too.
So how would you explain astronauts repairing satelites outside of the shuttle?
__________________

It all comes down to this on election day: Are you a racist, or do you look down on spastics?
Reply With Quote
  #182 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2007
jpsartre12's Avatar
jpsartre12 jpsartre12 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: On the Right of most issues
Posts: 5,633

United_States     Michigan

Re: The moon landing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wallaroo View Post
So how would you explain astronauts repairing satelites outside of the shuttle?
Smoke and mirrors?
__________________
843rd Bomb Wing - Strategic Air Command
"Peace is our Profession"

"Human law must rest its authority ultimately upon the authority of that law which is Divine. . . . Far from being rivals or enemies, religion and law are twin sisters, friends, and mutual assistants.
" - James Wilson, U. S. Supreme Court Justice and Signer of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #183 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2007
Swoop187's Avatar
Swoop187 Swoop187 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,377

United_States     Italy

Re: The moon landing

Quote:
Originally Posted by GravidMind View Post
I really think USPOL should have a conspiracy section. But before I go into the wacko world, is it some sort of collective reasoning that grand conspiracies can not exist; are just out and out impossible like a aquare circle despite suspicious and unanswerable evidence?

Here are some interesting links that propose that the lunar landing on the moon was fake:

Was The Apollo Moon Landing Fake?

and:

The Moon Shots Were Faked

Do you remember the James Bond movie "Diamonds Are Forever"? If you have seen this movie you may remember a scene where Mr. Bond, James Bond tries to escape the clutches of evil henceman through a scientific space research facility. He runs into a room that looks like a studio set up to be a lunar landscape with slow motion actors in moon suits and the whole bit. I thought that was sorta funny. Anyway, I'm kinda swayed to believe there is a better than good chance we have been duped. And if it one day, somehow, came out that it was fake, I'm almost positive that I would have one of the best laughs I had in a long time.

Can't leave out partisan hackery:

Bush could learn a lot about public duplicity from that good 'ol administration!
Well I have read all the nonsense about how we didnt land on the moon and the evidence that supports it and i must say that anyone who actually believes it is not too bright.

The flag.....mmm one would think that when you place a flag in the ground on a moon that has 1/10th the gravity of earth the jerking and movement from putting the damn thing in the ground will make it flap.

solar radiation.... we do space walks right??? so why dont the astronauts after a space walk come back with high levels of radiation in there system???

thats just the begining of the squashing of these "theroies"
__________________
America’s political correctness is a disease that will bring down our once fine nation.
Reply With Quote
  #184 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2007
Analyst's Avatar
Analyst Analyst is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Global
Posts: 1,396

Finland     European_Union

Re: The moon landing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wallaroo View Post
So how would you explain astronauts repairing satelites outside of the shuttle?
Astronauts are operating under the Van Allen magnetic belt which is reducing 99.9 % of the deadly cosmic radiation entering the atmosphere (< 400 km) and the earth surface. Without such Van Allen belt and the atmosphere humans would die immediatelly on earth. In Moon there is no atmosphere and no magnetic belt and cosmic radiation is just killing (100 % from radiation compared with 0.1 % on earth). NASA has mentioned that the Apollo astronauts had radiation detectors and the figures were similar to earth (below working standards on earth). This is an evidence that they never went to Moon as the radiation figures should be just radically higher there.
Even the astronauts on low Earth orbit well below the protective zone are in danger whenever there are solar radiation bursts - and there is no protection - the capsule does not help - they would need 1-2 m thick led walls. How to explain this?

PS. Van Allen himself did not know much about the belt characteristics nominated according to him - he just made first predictions.
Reply With Quote
  #185 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2007
Neal_Van Neal_Van is offline
Temporarily Banned
Blue Eyes 88

 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: The States (outdoor prison)
Posts: 2,057

Germany     Sweden

Re: The moon landing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Analyst View Post
Astronauts are operating under the Van Allen magnetic belt which is reducing 99.9 % of the deadly cosmic radiation entering the atmosphere (< 400 km) and the earth surface. Without such Van Allen belt and the atmosphere humans would die immediatelly on earth. In Moon there is no atmosphere and no magnetic belt and cosmic radiation is just killing (100 % from radiation compared with 0.1 % on earth). NASA has mentioned that the Apollo astronauts had radiation detectors and the figures were similar to earth (below working standards on earth). This is an evidence that they never went to Moon as the radiation figures should be just radically higher there.
Even the astronauts on low Earth orbit well below the protective zone are in danger whenever there are solar radiation bursts - and there is no protection - the capsule does not help - they would need 1-2 m thick led walls. How to explain this?

PS. Van Allen himself did not know much about the belt characteristics nominated according to him - he just made first predictions.
so the shadow analysis of pictures on the moon and other evidence is true... and my first name doesn't mean as much... sniff
Reply With Quote
  #186 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2007
Neal_Van Neal_Van is offline
Temporarily Banned
Blue Eyes 88

 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: The States (outdoor prison)
Posts: 2,057

Germany     Sweden

Re: The moon landing

I know in movie that when the lead actor says you go east, you go south, and I'll go west that it's all over for the other 2. And the joke about the cat as the helicopter comes (hold on ) flying up as he gets to the top of the cliff and the end of the joke is on him because the men in black catch him and kill him from the helicopter but the cat is saved in the joke.. The lead actor is saved and sprints across a field to his wife and the story ends..

Last edited by Neal_Van; 01-10-2007 at 08:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #187 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2007
Neal_Van Neal_Van is offline
Temporarily Banned
Blue Eyes 88

 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: The States (outdoor prison)
Posts: 2,057

Germany     Sweden

Re: The moon landing

I've been waiting for the sequal but they haven't made one..
Reply With Quote
  #188 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2007
Tethys Tethys is offline
Eternal optimist

 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,989

Earth     Australia

Re: The moon landing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Analyst View Post
PS. Van Allen himself did not know much about the belt characteristics nominated according to him - he just made first predictions.
I assume this footnote in your above post is a reply to my post #180 on this thread?

I am appalled that anyone could dismiss so flippantly a scientist of the calibre of Dr James Van Allen.

I will not let your remark to stand unanswered.

I do not have much scientific knowledge, but I know enough to determine that Dr James Van Allen is a distinguished expert in the field of cosmic radiation.

In answer to the FOX Moon landing hoax claim documentary, he said:

Quote:
The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense.
-- Dr. James Van Allen

Quoted in Environment - radiation and the van allen belts
Clavius: Environment - radiation and the van allen belts

Also see the Clavius: Environment - radiation primer for more information on cosmic radiation.
Clavius: Environment - radiation primer

Other resources on Dr James Van Allen:

In Memoriam: James A. Van Allen
by Stamatios "Tom" Krimigis
Emeritus Head, Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University
James A. Van Allen - Department of Physics and Astronomy - The University of Iowa

The James A. Van Allen Papers
CHRISTINE D. HALAS
Christine Halas on the James A. Van Allen Papers

U.S. Space Pioneer, UI Professor James A. Van Allen Dies
SpaceRef.com
PRESS RELEASE
Wednesday, August 9, 2006
Error - No Page | SpaceRef - Space News as it Happens20565

RIP James Van Allen - I salute you.

Tethys
__________________
Quote:
We shall never be able to remove suspicion and fear as potential causes of war until communication is permitted to flow, free and open, across international
boundaries.
-- Harry S. Truman

Last edited by Tethys; 01-11-2007 at 05:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #189 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2007
Tethys Tethys is offline
Eternal optimist

 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,989

Earth     Australia

Re: The moon landing

Good night USPOLites...going to bed now.

Sleep in peace, Dr James Van Allen.

Tethys
__________________
Quote:
We shall never be able to remove suspicion and fear as potential causes of war until communication is permitted to flow, free and open, across international
boundaries.
-- Harry S. Truman
Reply With Quote
  #190 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2007
Analyst's Avatar
Analyst Analyst is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Global
Posts: 1,396

Finland     European_Union

Re: The moon landing

Tethys - it is funny that you found these "Clavius" pages from the net. These stories about radiation in moon travel are completely non-scientific. Text is also written in a absurd way. The text looks like scientific, but it is a complete lie. If this article is the best one to explain the radiation problem, I am 100 % sure that they never went to the moon. I refer some stupidities here.

"Apollo navigators plotted a course through the thinnest parts of the belts"

They are above the poles. There are very funny explanations how the Apollo rockets went around the Van Allen belts - this is not even possible. In that case they had to go from the polar areas out and moon is circulating almost in earth equatorial orbit. However, they were in other connections explained to use the rockets in earth orbit to go to the moon orbit - not at first to a completely wrong direction and turning around (they did not have even energy for such a manouver).

"deadly radiation in the Van Allen belts, but the nature of that radiation was known to the Apollo engineers and they were able to make suitable preparations.!"

There is nothing to do for preparations! You must have a very thick heavy armor around you - and they didn't.

"Shielding" does not always mean thick slabs of dense material."

Unfortunately it did and still does. There was just a month ago an article in Nature about new materials against radiation - but such will not help much even in the future.

" Each astronaut wore a personal dosimeter."

And these showed safe earth-like figures which is just nonsense - compare radiation anounts of 100% on moon vs. 0.1 % on earth. This is ridiculous.

PS - Van Allen does not mention anything about Apollo and moon travel in his papers - see e.g. those linked below. Nor has Neal Armstrong ever mentioned that he has been on moon - he has never given a public interview. Only one where they said that they did not see any starts in the moon (which is a very ridiculous statement as well).
Reply With Quote
  #191 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2007
MattLarson's Avatar
MattLarson MattLarson is offline
Moderator, Bulk Rate
Fear my squirrelly wrath!!!!

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 27,073

United_States     Florida

Re: The moon landing

Bah, more "high" science.

Did you ever figure out how the flags were waving in the picture I posted, Analyst?

Matt
__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum
Reply With Quote
  #192 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2007
Analyst's Avatar
Analyst Analyst is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Global
Posts: 1,396

Finland     European_Union

Re: The moon landing

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattLarson View Post
Bah, more "high" science.
Did you ever figure out how the flags were waving in the picture I posted, Analyst?
Matt
Such a detail can any time be argued. I have been interested in major scientific errors in the Apollo information - such as:
- The altitude and size of earth seen from moon (up to 40 degrees errors / 50 % in size - very few pictures have earth in it because it can be a risky object)
- Dating the sky using positions of stars ... this is not possible as there are no visible stars even if they should be striking there.
- Identifying positions using illumination ... e.g. of earth (in some pictures we see full earth even if the position of moon was far away from such position).
- Radiation anomalies.
I am sure that the Apollo materials has been very much fabricated ... probably they did not have proper cameras that time as the head designer of Hasselblad said (his camera did not operate on moon temperatures of -150 ... + 180 C.
I don't want to say that the whole business was a hoax - I just want to point the fabricated materials.
Reply With Quote
  #193 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2007
MattLarson's Avatar
MattLarson MattLarson is offline
Moderator, Bulk Rate
Fear my squirrelly wrath!!!!

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 27,073

United_States     Florida

Re: The moon landing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Analyst View Post
- Dating the sky using positions of stars ... this is not possible as there are no visible stars even if they should be striking there.
This is a common error, but one any photographer knows about.

The photos were metered to properly expose the close up, well lit items. The stars did not show up - as one would expect.

Another example (of many) of your "inconsistencies" that have very simple explanations.

Matt
__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum
Reply With Quote
  #194 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2007
Wallaroo's Avatar
Wallaroo Wallaroo is offline
Secretary of Defense
Permanently Banned (you wish)

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 2,448

European_Union    
Re: The moon landing

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattLarson View Post
Bah, more "high" science.

Did you ever figure out how the flags were waving in the picture I posted, Analyst?

Matt
My guess would be that the extremely low gravity makes the flag waving for several minutes (or more) before it stops and hangs down.
__________________

It all comes down to this on election day: Are you a racist, or do you look down on spastics?

Last edited by Wallaroo; 01-11-2007 at 05:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #195 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2007
Wallaroo's Avatar
Wallaroo Wallaroo is offline
Secretary of Defense
Permanently Banned (you wish)

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 2,448

European_Union    
Re: The moon landing

Quote:
Originally Posted by GravidMind View Post
I really think USPOL should have a conspiracy section. But before I go into the wacko world, is it some sort of collective reasoning that grand conspiracies can not exist; are just out and out impossible like a aquare circle despite suspicious and unanswerable evidence?

Here are some interesting links that propose that the lunar landing on the moon was fake:

Was The Apollo Moon Landing Fake?

and:

The Moon Shots Were Faked

Do you remember the James Bond movie "Diamonds Are Forever"? If you have seen this movie you may remember a scene where Mr. Bond, James Bond tries to escape the clutches of evil henceman through a scientific space research facility. He runs into a room that looks like a studio set up to be a lunar landscape with slow motion actors in moon suits and the whole bit. I thought that was sorta funny. Anyway, I'm kinda swayed to believe there is a better than good chance we have been duped. And if it one day, somehow, came out that it was fake, I'm almost positive that I would have one of the best laughs I had in a long time.

Can't leave out partisan hackery:

Bush could learn a lot about public duplicity from that good 'ol administration!
Then you are also saying that all the gigantic Saturn-V rockets were drones.
__________________

It all comes down to this on election day: Are you a racist, or do you look down on spastics?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On