Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Information and Research > Historical Discourse

Historical Discourse A discussion forum dedicated to history.

Reply
 
LinkBack (3) Thread Tools Display Modes
  #241 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2007
Tethys Tethys is offline
Eternal optimist

 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,989

Earth     Australia

Re: The moon landing

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpsartre12 View Post
You know what I find incredible? This is the 240th post to this ridiculous thread.
And this one will make 16 of those posts that are mine!

Come on, I think every political forum on the Internet has at least one Moon landing conspiracy thread, JP.

But I think I've exhausted all my arguments here.

Tethys
__________________
Quote:
We shall never be able to remove suspicion and fear as potential causes of war until communication is permitted to flow, free and open, across international
boundaries.
-- Harry S. Truman
Reply With Quote
  #242 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2007
Analyst's Avatar
Analyst Analyst is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Global
Posts: 1,396

Finland     European_Union

Re: The moon landing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewl View Post
But obviously they are not technical obstacles that can't be overcome. Im not a scientist and i can imagine several possible solutions to all those problems.
Anyway the launches were public and several thousand people watched them, so again, why would they go to all the trouble of building and launching massive rockets into space and not just go to the moon in the first place?
Andrew
NASA has predicted that within the next ten years these problems can be overcome and they have plans to establish a research station to moon - which is the easiest way to go as such base would give protection and security as well. Computers is not the core problem but energy and shielding.

The Apollo landings were real, but the crews had secret military missions on a low earth orbit. They were buiding a spy station and worked for military space shield - star wars project. Saturn-5 rocket was designd for transportation to low-earth orbit - not to planetary flights leaving earth's gravity.

The frauds I have seen in the Apollo materials are very serious. Of course we can say that only the materials were fake but the fligjhts were done. I cannot accept this explanation if NASA is not willing to apologize the fraud.

The way how they imitated Earth from the distance by filming the window of the dark capsule was awkward. And tha way how the astronauts reacted when this was revealed was criminal. For me, the strongest evidence that the pictures are fake is that earth seen from the moon is very much too small and completely in a wrong place. Even if the photographer wanted to avoid errors by leaving stars out and avoided earth also (cloud pattern could have revealed the day of photo), he did not understand that earth is always in a same position seen from moon - there are no earth rises and down because moon keeps its same face towards earth all the time.

One serious error is the publishing of Apollo 17 picture from the earth. It was FULL earth indicating that the rocket went towards the sun - which again means that the moon was between earth and sun. However all the landing sites were on this site visible to earth and during moon's day time. So this situation is impossible - the landing site was in complete darkness if the earth picture was taken from Apollo and only after 10 days situation was possible. Actually - the earth picture is exactly similar that the then new weather satellites took from the altitude of 36.000 km. Why they made such orchestrations?

Last edited by Analyst; 01-18-2007 at 08:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #243 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2007
Analyst's Avatar
Analyst Analyst is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Global
Posts: 1,396

Finland     European_Union

Re: The moon landing

Here are some interesting points on the Apollo program. It is interesting that Neil Armstrong has never said to have been on the moon - other way round - he has denied that. Actually, he has never given any interviews - only one at a school where he mentioned that he has described how to go to the moon and now the kids must once do that in reality.

Quote:
After WW II, ex-Nazis were not very popular in the U.S. Especially war criminals like Wernher von Braun. If he was to lead the Pentagon space program, he would need an image overhaul. This is where Walt Disney entered the picture. Disney had a snow white image and nobody would suspect him of working with SS Nazis rocketeers.
The Pentagon desperately needed money to build ICBM's and rockets that would be able to deliver weapons of mass destruction to the Soviet Union.
If Walt Disney could simulate a moon landing in a studio (much cheaper), then the $20 billion dollars which Congress appropriated for the moon landing could be used to fight the Cold War with the Soviet Union instead!!
The space race and the Vietnam War would also DISTRACT the people while Rockefeller stole the Presidency without an election.
President Kennedy and NASA administrator James T. Webb at the launch Operations Complex during a tour of NASA in Nov. 1963. Did Kennedy decide to talk about von Braun and his fake moon landing? If he had, this was another reason for Rockefeller and the Pentagon to order his assassination!!
And another quote from moonstruck Neil Armstrong:
"As for walking on the moon, sometimes I wonder if that really happened. I can honestly say—and it's a great surprise to me that I have never had a dream about being on the moon. It's a great disappointment to me." (Wagener, One Giant Leap, p. 303).

General Leslie "Dick" Groves

Correction: In my previous post I say "The Apollo landings were real..." I actually mean The Apollo launches were real...
Reply With Quote
  #244 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2007
Rocky Rocky is offline
Citizen

 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 13

   
Re: The moon landing

In "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon" at the 30 minute 38 second mark it is alleged that slow motion is used to simulate moon gravity.
YouTube - A funny thing happened on the way to the moon

Look at the movements in this clip.
YouTube - Moon Landing Hoax - Wires Footage

I can see the difference. In some footage "Slow motion" was used. In some footage "Wire supports" were used. The body movements are noticeably different.

Here's some more stuff I've collected.
Man didnt land on the moon - Google Video
http://www.thule.org/brains/moon.rm

What Happened on the Moon - 1 of 2 - Google Video
What Happened on the Moon - 2 of 2 - Google Video

Astronauts Gone Wild - Google Video

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon - Google Video

This has seven parts
YouTube - APOLLO 11 Most Miserable Press Conference in History Part 1

Apollo details

YouTube - Flight Director Gene Kranz says Apollo 11 telemetry gone.

The people who made those videos did make a few mistakes but I think those videos pretty much prove that we never went to the moon.
Reply With Quote
  #245 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2007
Rocky Rocky is offline
Citizen

 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 13

   
Re: The moon landing

Here's some very clear proof that we never went to the moon.

YouTube - Apollo 15 waving flag
2 minute 35 second mark.

The flag moves after the astronaut walks past it. He doesn't touch it. The flag moves because of air current.

There's an analysis of it here at the 3 minute 5 second mark.
YouTube - Moon Hoax- Apollos Atmospheric Moon
Reply With Quote
  #246 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2007
Speakeasy's Avatar
Speakeasy Speakeasy is offline
Moderator
Speaking Easily

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Herndon, Virginia
Posts: 17,663

United_States     Virginia

Re: The moon landing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocky View Post
The flag moves after the astronaut walks past it. He doesn't touch it. The flag moves because of air current.
The obvious answer is he touched it as he walked by. You have no possible way of proving that no contact was made, which is what your entire idea relies upon.

Can you show me that he did not touch it?
__________________
"Anyone that needs what they want, and doesn’t want what they need
I want nothing to do with
And to do what I want
And to do what I please
Is first on my to-do list
"
-Gnarls Barkley, "Going On" lyrics
Reply With Quote
  #247 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2007
Speakeasy's Avatar
Speakeasy Speakeasy is offline
Moderator
Speaking Easily

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Herndon, Virginia
Posts: 17,663

United_States     Virginia

Re: The moon landing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocky View Post
There's an analysis of it here at the 3 minute 5 second mark.
YouTube - Moon Hoax- Apollos Atmospheric Moon
LOL...seriously? You use the word "analysis" quite loosely.
__________________
"Anyone that needs what they want, and doesn’t want what they need
I want nothing to do with
And to do what I want
And to do what I please
Is first on my to-do list
"
-Gnarls Barkley, "Going On" lyrics
Reply With Quote
  #248 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2007
McAlly's Avatar
McAlly McAlly is offline
City Mayor

 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: us
Posts: 224

   
Re: The moon landing

Look Bozo. I was part of the making of the LEM- Lunar Excursion Module. It went to the moon buddy boy!
__________________
From toxic waste to the unpronounceables on your food labels, chemicals are all around and within us......
Reply With Quote
  #249 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2007
Speedyer's Avatar
Speedyer Speedyer is offline
City Mayor

 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 2,003

United_States     Florida

Re: The moon landing

I look forward to the day that the rest of the world is involved in this "conspiracy". After all with lasers you can basically bounce light off the spacecraft/rovers left up there. There are already two moon probes up there at this very moment, and two more go up next year. Then five more between 2010 and 2013. With the only US one being in 2008.

So let the moon landing conspiracy continue beyond just the US, because every nation in the world is going to lie to us. Them pesky government and their dirty dirty lies. Either way, I wish this nonsense would be silenced one way or another, but at the same time I know people will always always believe what they want. Which is what is wrong with this country, instead of facts and ideas based on truth, we put more stock in belief. Belief that the world is melting, belief that the world is a few thousand years old, and in the end you have so much garbage that it can be hard to see through to the truth.
Reply With Quote
  #250 (permalink)  
Old 11-25-2007
AdrienXII AdrienXII is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: france
Posts: 5,158

   
Re: The moon landing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speakeasy View Post
The obvious answer is he touched it as he walked by. You have no possible way of proving that no contact was made, which is what your entire idea relies upon.

Can you show me that he did not touch it?
Could be it was hit by a micrometeorite, too...
Reply With Quote
  #251 (permalink)  
Old 11-25-2007
Rocky Rocky is offline
Citizen

 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 13

   
Re: The moon landing

Quote:
The obvious answer is he touched it as he walked by. You have no possible way of proving that no contact was made, which is what your entire idea relies upon.

Can you show me that he did not touch it?
Look at the size of the astronat's arm when he's close to the flag and then again when he walks by it at the 2 minute 5 second mark. His arm is quite a bit bigger showing he was much closer to the camera.
Also, if you double-click quickly on the mouse to make it go frame by frame, it's clear that he doesn't touch it. He must be three feet from it.

YouTube - Apollo 15 waving flag
Reply With Quote
  #252 (permalink)  
Old 11-25-2007
Wallaroo's Avatar
Wallaroo Wallaroo is offline
Secretary of Defense
Permanently Banned (you wish)

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 2,448

European_Union    
Re: The moon landing

About all this fake moon landing stuff. If it were fake the first time, then what about the Saturn V rocket they launched, and the astronauts onboard it?
__________________

It all comes down to this on election day: Are you a racist, or do you look down on spastics?
Reply With Quote
  #253 (permalink)  
Old 11-25-2007
AdrienXII AdrienXII is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: france
Posts: 5,158

   
Re: The moon landing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wallaroo View Post
About all this fake moon landing stuff. If it were fake the first time, then what about the Saturn V rocket they launched, and the astronauts onboard it?
Fake. Directed by George Lucas, actually.
Reply With Quote
  #254 (permalink)  
Old 11-25-2007
jpsartre12's Avatar
jpsartre12 jpsartre12 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: On the Right of most issues
Posts: 5,633

United_States     Michigan

Re: The moon landing

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdrienXII View Post
Fake. Directed by George Lucas, actually.

It's all done with smoke and mirrors, you know.
__________________
843rd Bomb Wing - Strategic Air Command
"Peace is our Profession"

"Human law must rest its authority ultimately upon the authority of that law which is Divine. . . . Far from being rivals or enemies, religion and law are twin sisters, friends, and mutual assistants.
" - James Wilson, U. S. Supreme Court Justice and Signer of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #255 (permalink)  
Old 11-25-2007
McAlly's Avatar
McAlly McAlly is offline
City Mayor

 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: us
Posts: 224

   
Re: The moon landing

__________________
From toxic waste to the unpronounceables on your food labels, chemicals are all around and within us......
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.uspoliticsonline.com/historical-discourse/29546-moon-landing.html
Posted By For Type Date
Did the US Really Go To The Moon ? - Hypercrites! Forum This thread Refback 04-19-2007 02:51 PM
Did the US Really Go To The Moon ? - Hypercrites! Forum This thread Refback 04-19-2007 02:22 PM
The moon landing - U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum This thread Refback 01-12-2007 11:09 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online