Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Historical Discourse A discussion forum dedicated to history. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Re: Religions and violence
Quote:
^ Mr. Michael thinks throwing around insults to inflate his ego make him right when he is most certainly wrong? Odd but funny. I have found when there is nothing left, Liberals collapse into childish insults while forming circle jerks with other Liberals and masturbating their egos way too much. Messy. Luckily im smarter and understand history enough to know that religion and politics always blend, especially Atheism, the most vile and self destructive religon in history clinging to the coat tails of Communism to force their nothing religion on the unsuspecting masses. Your thoughts? |
|
|||
|
Re: Religions and violence
Quote:
You are now reminding me of Simon the Jester (a long-since banned member). |
|
|||
|
Re: Religions and violence
Quote:
Quote:
I don't know who's more mixed up, the posters trying to paint atheism as evil or those trying to defend atheism against the charge. Seems like a heck of a lot of political disinformation campaigns are going on here. For anyone remotely concerned with actual terms, a-theism is an objection against theism which can be understood to represent "the Church" or formal heirarchies of religion, and/or theology. The term has no reference to God at all. And it is not a "belief" system at all. |
|
||||
|
Re: Religions and violence
Quote:
Atheism can be derived directly from the Greek atheos or "no god". More pratically, in common usage "atheist" (at least in all my experience) is used to describe someone who believes there is no God (or are no gods). |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|