Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Information and Research > Historical Discourse

View Poll Results: Who would you fight for?
NORTH Union Army 56 70.00%
SOUTH Rebels 24 30.00%
Voters: 80. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008
ThorHammer's Avatar
ThorHammer ThorHammer is offline
Secretary of State
Victory or Valhalla!

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 3,697

Minnesota     Germany

Re: NORTH or SOUTH

Quote:
Originally Posted by Queshank View Post
He did say conservative not liberal And in 1862 the Democrats were the conservatives while the Republicans were the radical liberals.

Times sure changed didn't they?

Queshank
Actually, they weren't. The Democrats of the south simply managed to cloak their fight for slavery behind a viel of "states rights" and "small government". they did a good job of it too. Republicans, on the other hand, stuck to conservative ideals by insisting that no man, woman, or child should be kept in bondage.
__________________
Success is measured in blood; yours or your enemy's.
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008
Queshank Queshank is offline
Active Citizen

 
Member Since: May 2007
Location: Minnesota, US
Posts: 88

   
Re: NORTH or SOUTH

Oh and incidentally ...

I chose the North. I have a great deal of admiration for Lincoln. And despite my support of state's rights and dislike of the federal government, I have trouble sympathizing with the South ... who only had a problem with the federal government in regards to slavery, and only threw their big hissy fit after the election of 1860 didn't go their way. Bad precedent. If states were able to secede from the Union every time an election didn't go their way, we'd have 50 little countries and the USA would have never existed.

Queshank
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2008
Queshank Queshank is offline
Active Citizen

 
Member Since: May 2007
Location: Minnesota, US
Posts: 88

   
Re: NORTH or SOUTH

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorHammer View Post
Actually, they weren't. The Democrats of the south simply managed to cloak their fight for slavery behind a viel of "states rights" and "small government". they did a good job of it too. Republicans, on the other hand, stuck to conservative ideals by insisting that no man, woman, or child should be kept in bondage.
Hmm. Methinks you're attempting to apply modern definitions of terms retroactively.

In fact, simply reading the Republican Party Platform of 1860 ... with it's support of Congress using appropriations for "improvemens" are "justified by the obligations of Government to protect the lives and property of its citizens". And it's support of taxation and using economic policy to secure "to the working men liberal wages, to agriculture remunerating prices, to mechanics and manufacturers an adequate reward for their skill, labor and enterprise" ... could almost be considered Democratic party planks today.

Oh and let's not forget about how they were "... opposed to any change in our Naturalization Laws or any State legislation by which the rights of our citizenship hitherto accorded to immigrants from foreign lands shall be abridged or impaired; and in favor of giving a full and efficient protection to the rights of all classes of citizens, whether native or naturalized, both at home and abroad."

They sound like damned socialists!

Queshank
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2008
AjaxPress's Avatar
AjaxPress AjaxPress is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 3,812

United_States     Ethiopia

Re: NORTH or SOUTH

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorHammer View Post
Actually, they weren't. The Democrats of the south simply managed to cloak their fight for slavery behind a viel of "states rights" and "small government". they did a good job of it too. Republicans, on the other hand, stuck to conservative ideals by insisting that no man, woman, or child should be kept in bondage.
Wait a minute, since when have liberals been screaming about "state's rights" and "small government"? No man woman or child being kept in bondage is very much a liberal point of view. Conservatives even tried to use religion to justify their morally bankrupt ideas and terrorist behavior.
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2008
Agentorange Agentorange is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Somewhere in England
Posts: 914

United    
Re: NORTH or SOUTH

Not being American, it doesn't have the same resonance for me....but I voted for the union.
__________________
England has no eternal friends and no eternal enemies, only eternal interests - Palmerston
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2008
Jazzy Jazzy is offline
Concerned Citizen
Daughter of the South

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Deep South
Posts: 35

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: NORTH or SOUTH

Quote:
Originally Posted by mawg View Post
the Confederacy , they were in the right

they wanted to leave the union and the desire to make them stay in was the ONLY reason the North protested.

The South should have been able to leave the union . so I would fight on the side which was right .
Absolutely correct, mawg !!!!

Also, someone should have ask the question; ' Why has the animosity of the War Between the States' lasted so long'?

IMO, it is because we Southerns are the only citizens of these now United States who have ever been attacked by and killed by our own government to forcibly break the will, steal the land and access to our resources by our own government....and then requisition it all for over 100 years.

Frankly, that pissed off a lot of folks down here. They've told their children and they've all told theirs, all about it down through the generations.

......and we're ready to take it all back now.

It's colder than a witches booby up north right now. Chilly down South too.

Could I interest ya'll in a little patch of sunshine?

It's gonna cost ya'.
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2008
erikvv's Avatar
erikvv erikvv is online now
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 2,102

European_Union     Netherlands

Re: NORTH or SOUTH

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorHammer View Post
Actually, they weren't. The Democrats of the south simply managed to cloak their fight for slavery behind a viel of "states rights" and "small government". they did a good job of it too. Republicans, on the other hand, stuck to conservative ideals by insisting that no man, woman, or child should be kept in bondage.
When someone says "liberal", individual rights is the first thing that pops up my mind. Did republicans back then call themselves mostly liberal or mostly conservative (whatever conservative may mean).
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2008
Speedyer's Avatar
Speedyer Speedyer is offline
City Mayor

 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,981

United_States     Florida

Re: NORTH or SOUTH

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzy View Post
Also, someone should have ask the question; ' Why has the animosity of the War Between the States' lasted so long'?
What animosity?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzy View Post
IMO, it is because we Southerns are the only citizens of these now United States who have ever been attacked by and killed by our own government to forcibly break the will, steal the land and access to our resources by our own government
You might have a point if it was 1868 instead of 2008, but the fact of the matter is that there is absolutely nobody left alive from that time. From that time we've intermingled with them damn Yankee's and moved into their states. So what exactly qualifies you as a true southern? Just living in a southern state? Birth in a southern state? Blood ties leading to the confederacy?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzy View Post
Frankly, that pissed off a lot of folks down here. They've told their children and they've all told theirs, all about it down through the generations.
Again though, if anyone is still pissed off about the Civil War I'm sure they're a very very very very small minority.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzy View Post
......and we're ready to take it all back now.
Take what back?
__________________
I don't pretend to know everything, educate me, and I'll try to educate you. Shouting matches and insults aren't going to convince me.
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2008
Queshank Queshank is offline
Active Citizen

 
Member Since: May 2007
Location: Minnesota, US
Posts: 88

   
Re: NORTH or SOUTH

Bill Maher said something I've thought was both profound and entertaining as hell a while ago.

Paraphrasing from a couple years old memory.

In response to a "conservative" southerner about him criticizing the people still claiming Gore won the 2000 election.

"Tell you what, we'll get over the 2000 election when you get over the election of 1860."

Heh. I still smiled typing that out.

Queshank
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2008
goober's Avatar
goober goober is online now
Vice President

 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 9,604

   
Re: NORTH or SOUTH

Quote:
Originally Posted by erikvv View Post
When someone says "liberal", individual rights is the first thing that pops up my mind. Did republicans back then call themselves mostly liberal or mostly conservative (whatever conservative may mean).
The Republicans were radicals back then, supporting government intervention in the marketplace, deficit spending, public financing of railroads, and a little later breaking up big business trusts and introducing the estate tax to soak the rich.

Now they just stand for deficit spending, but it's good to know some things never change.
__________________
“The thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine.”

Senator Thad Cochran, Mississippi (R)
on McCain

“I decided I didn’t want this guy anywhere near a trigger.”
Senator Pete Domenici, New Mexico (R)
on McCain

“My anger did not help my campaign ... People don’t like angry candidates very much.”

McCain on McCain
Reply With Quote
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2008
timj219's Avatar
timj219 timj219 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 4,540

United_States     New_York

Re: NORTH or SOUTH

Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
The Republicans were radicals back then, supporting government intervention in the marketplace, deficit spending, public financing of railroads, and a little later breaking up big business trusts and introducing the estate tax to soak the rich.

Now they just stand for deficit spending, but it's good to know some things never change.
I think "Internal Improvements" was the catchphrase of the day for republicans back then. Damns, bridges, roads, canals, railroads, harbors, there never was a public works project they didn't think should be publicly funded. It's no accident that so many prominent republicans of the civil war era were railroad lawyers since the railroads spent so much time in court fighting to get and keep those grants of public land and money.
__________________
The most important political office is that of private citizen.
Louis D. Brandeis - First Jewish Supreme Court Justice
Reply With Quote
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2008
Impugn's Avatar
Impugn Impugn is offline
U.S. Senator
Right Wing Forum Guard (JOIN NOW!)

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: The G.R.U.E.
Posts: 730

United_States     Pennsylvania

Re: NORTH or SOUTH

Quote:
Originally Posted by steveox View Post
Just imagine today is spring in 1862.Who will you sign up for? UNION ARMY? Or CONFEDERATE ARMY?

::SNIP PIC::

Vote!
Neither. I'd avert the entire war by giving Congress a video tour of modern day Detroit.

Hundreds of thousands of lives saved.
__________________

"Compassionate Conservatism"?!?! That is a stupid phrase. Conservatism is inherently compassionate. It is liberalism that is cruel for the sake of maintaining a constituency.
Reply With Quote
  #73 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2008
Speedyer's Avatar
Speedyer Speedyer is offline
City Mayor

 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,981

United_States     Florida

Re: NORTH or SOUTH

Quote:
Originally Posted by Impugn View Post
Neither. I'd avert the entire war by giving Congress a video tour of modern day Detroit.

Hundreds of thousands of lives saved.
I don't get it, then again I'm a southern.
__________________
I don't pretend to know everything, educate me, and I'll try to educate you. Shouting matches and insults aren't going to convince me.
Reply With Quote
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2008
Impugn's Avatar
Impugn Impugn is offline
U.S. Senator
Right Wing Forum Guard (JOIN NOW!)

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: The G.R.U.E.
Posts: 730

United_States     Pennsylvania

Re: NORTH or SOUTH

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedyer View Post
I don't get it, then again I'm a southern.
I'm just saying that given such information, they might tend to come up with a better, less violent, compromise solution.

Perhaps something involving Liberia being 10x the size it turned out to be.
__________________

"Compassionate Conservatism"?!?! That is a stupid phrase. Conservatism is inherently compassionate. It is liberalism that is cruel for the sake of maintaining a constituency.
Reply With Quote
  #75 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008
gem gem is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: Closer to the mountaintop.
Posts: 3,073

   
Re: NORTH or SOUTH

For the North- absolutely. I have no use for those who think they have the right to enslave others just in order to enrich themselves.

Gem
__________________
There is no political solution to our troubled evolution.

"Reality, the left-wing liberal conspiracy. "
Credited to Angry American.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online