Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Information and Research > Historical Discourse

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-2008
ThorHammer's Avatar
ThorHammer ThorHammer is offline
Secretary of State
Victory or Valhalla!

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 4,066

Minnesota     Germany

Re: Bombing of Dresden

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim View Post
I don't think it's a choice between the two. Germany's ability to wage war was defined by several things. If the civilian morale is broken by bombs that land in the middle of their work day and destroy their homes and offices, perhaps the workers would rise up against the Nazis? Perhaps they would lose hundreds of hours they might be using working within towards the war effort? In those cases, that would be defined as attacking Grermany's ability to wage war.

The Nazis were waging a war in which they disregarded the moral code and all sense of decency and basic respect for human life on a scale never before seen. They had sown the wind and now they would reap the whirlwind. The same was true of Imperial Japan. But as the war progressed, the allies did start to view the enemy as less than human in some cases. I would emphasize: in some cases.

The deliberate creation of a cyclone of flame that would suck people - men, women, children, infants in prams, the elderly - into a ghastly death is in itself evil.
Good points, Tim. I agree, as I have stated before, that the tactic of firebombing (at least to me) was overkill. Either way, with or without firebombing, innocents were going to die. However, the bombing campaign as a whole was quite effective at strangling German industry, and their ability to transport troops and supplies to the various fronts.

EDIT: I did not intend for the effects of the bombing to appear as two choices. I believe then went hand in hand. Sorry for any confusion.
__________________
Success is measured in blood; yours or your enemy's.

Last edited by ThorHammer; 02-14-2008 at 01:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #77 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-2008
ThorHammer's Avatar
ThorHammer ThorHammer is offline
Secretary of State
Victory or Valhalla!

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 4,066

Minnesota     Germany

Re: Bombing of Dresden

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Rabbit View Post
Your apparent need to deny the plain words of Churchill's memo is quite telling.

Whether you accept reality or not is none of my concern.
Where does he admit the bombing campaign was a terror campaign, and a terror campaign alone?

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Rabbit View Post
Rail hub I'll accept.

And it is plainly obvious that a massive and coordinated fire-bombing operation (that just happens to be a highly effective way to kill maximum civilians) was designed entirely to destroy the railroads.
As I have stated before, I think the firebombing tactics were overkill. The same could have been accomplished with regular HE bombs. However, innocents were going to die either way.
__________________
Success is measured in blood; yours or your enemy's.
Reply With Quote
  #78 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-2008
Malvolio's Avatar
Malvolio Malvolio is offline
Moderator

 
Member Since: Apr 2003
Location: 51st parallel
Posts: 8,171

Germany    
Re: Bombing of Dresden

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorHammer View Post
Where does he admit the bombing campaign was a terror campaign, and a terror campaign alone?



As I have stated before, I think the firebombing tactics were overkill. The same could have been accomplished with regular HE bombs. However, innocents were going to die either way.
What about "bombing of German cities simply for the sake of increasing the terror, though under other pretexts, should be reviewed"? Nobody claims that bombing campaign was solely targeting civilians. Of course the main targets were the German military, industry and infrastructure. But it also was systematically targeting civilians ... not only in Dresden btw. ... in order to break the moral of the German people.
Reply With Quote
  #79 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-2008
42 Regular 42 Regular is offline
County Executive

 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: Southeastern USA
Posts: 347

   
Re: Bombing of Dresden

Quote:
Under pressure from the Chiefs of Staff and in response to the views expressed by Portal and Harris among others, Churchill withdrew his memo and issued a new one.[88][89][90] This was completed on April 1, 1945:

It seems to me that the moment has come when the question of the so called 'area-bombing' of German cities should be reviewed from the point of view of our own interests. If we come into control of an entirely ruined land, there will be a great shortage of accommodation for ourselves and our allies… We must see to it that our attacks do no more harm to ourselves in the long run than they do to the enemy's war effort.[88][87]
Harris' response to the original memo.
Quote:
Attacks on cities like any other act of war are intolerable unless they are strategically justified. But they are strategically justified in so far as they tend to shorten the war and preserve the lives of Allied soldiers. To my mind we have absolutely no right to give them up unless it is certain that they will not have this effect.
Quote:
Actually Dresden was a mass of munitions works, an intact government centre, and a key transportation point to the East. It is now none of these things.[88]
Quote:
According to official German report Tagesbefehl (Order of the Day) no. 47 ("TB47") issued on 22 March the number of dead recovered by that date was 20,204, including 6,865 who were cremated on the Altmarkt, and the total number of deaths was expected to be about 25,000[69][70][71] Another report on 3 April put the number of corpses recovered at 22,096.[69] The municipal cemetery office recorded 21,271 victims of the raids were buried in the city cemeteries, of which 17,295 were placed in the Heidefriedhof cemetery (a total that included the ashes of those cremated at the Altmarkt). These numbers were probably supplemented by a number of additional private burials in other places.[69] A further 1,858 bodies of victims were found during the rebuilding of Dresden between the end of the war and 1966.[72] Since 1989 despite the extensive excavation for new buildings no war related bodies have been found.[72] The number of people registered with the authorities as missing was 35,000; around 10,000 of those were later found to be alive.[66]
Quote:
On February 16, the Propaganda Ministry issued a press release that established the Nazi line — Dresden had no war industries; it was a city of culture.[75]

On February 25, a new leaflet with photographs of two burned children was released under the title "Dresden — Massacre of Refugees," stating that 200,000 had died. Since no official estimate had been developed, the numbers were speculative, but newspapers such as the Stockholm Svenska Morgonbladet used phrases such as "privately from Berlin," to explain where they had obtained the figures.[76] Frederick Taylor states that "there is good reason to believe that later in March copies of — or extracts from — [an official police report] were leaked to the neutral press by Goebbels's Propaganda Ministry ... doctored with an extra zero to make [the total dead from the raid] 202,040."[citation needed] On March 4, Das Reich, a weekly newspaper founded by Goebbels, published a lengthy article emphasizing the suffering and destruction of a cultural icon, without mentioning any damage the attacks had caused to the German war effort.[70][77]
Bombing of Dresden in World War II - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It would seem that the futher we get from the events the further some get from the facts, and NAZI propaganda seems to be having a resurgence in popularity.
Reply With Quote
  #80 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-2008
42 Regular 42 Regular is offline
County Executive

 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: Southeastern USA
Posts: 347

   
Re: Bombing of Dresden

From the City of Dresden official site
Quote:
In the late evening of 13th February 1945, several hundred British bombers flew a first raid against the city centre of Dresden. They were followed a few hours later by an even more devastating wave of attack, and during the daytime on 14th and 15th February 1945 by American formations. These four air raids reduced practically the whole of the centre of Dresden to rubble, and cost the lives of tens of thousands of its inhabitants.

In its sixth year, the Second World War which Germany had unleashed and which had already claimed so many millions of victims, returned to Dresden with a vengeance. The bombing struck a city which was home to hundreds of thousands of ordinary people, and a cradle of priceless cultural treasures, but at the same time a city which was fully integrated into the German war effort.
City of Dresden

Note
Quote:
and cost the lives of tens of thousands of its inhabitants
Not hundreds of thousands, not the two hundred thousand plus claimed by NAZI propaganda. I've seen figures as high as 350,000 claimed by some.
Reply With Quote
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2008
Analyst's Avatar
Analyst Analyst is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Global
Posts: 1,335

Finland     European_Union

Re: Bombing of Dresden

Of course the destruction of civil cities by USA and GB in the WW2 was one of the many similar genocides that those countries have used to do and still today do. This is MILITARISM - a religion which leans on the idea that destruction and slaughtering abroad is one of the tools to develop own economy. Dresden is a monument of western militarism (= Nazism by USA and GB).

Today we can see US militarism in operation in the oil countries - and the purpose is the very same - by destroying countries rich in natural resources the militarists believe that the resources belong to them.

The oil business in Iraq was sold to some other countries before the US invented war and now the industry is in US hands. This is something that the modern world should not tolerate. Criminals should be isolated from the global community even if that is difficult and costly.
Reply With Quote
  #82 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2008
42 Regular 42 Regular is offline
County Executive

 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: Southeastern USA
Posts: 347

   
Re: Bombing of Dresden

Quote:
The oil business in Iraq was sold to some other countries before the US invented war and now the industry is in US hands.
How so?
Reply With Quote
  #83 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2008
Tim Tim is offline
Vice President
Eisenhower Conservative

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: US
Posts: 8,090

United_States     United

Re: Bombing of Dresden

Quote:
Originally Posted by 42 Regular View Post
How so?
I would ask you: please don't get him started. This is a serious thread about an important topic, and he will turn it into yet another "Americans are evil lunatics" thread. It has happened innumerable times, regardless of the original topic.

Please do not be offended by this. It is not directed against you at all. You are new here. I am saying this because this topic has a particualr significance for me and I have seen so many threads destroyed here.
__________________
"Our fears in Banquo
Stick deep; in his royalty of nature
Reigns that which would be fear'd: 'tis much he dares;
And, to that dauntless temper of his mind,
He hath a wisdom that doth guide his valour
To act in safety."

Macbeth 3:1
Reply With Quote
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2008
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 12,096

United_States    
Re: Bombing of Dresden

can I ask why its significant tim?
Reply With Quote
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2008
Tim Tim is offline
Vice President
Eisenhower Conservative

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: US
Posts: 8,090

United_States     United

Re: Bombing of Dresden

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
can I ask why its significant tim?
I didn't mean that alone was the reason.

Alright, here's the explanation: I have very close German friends. They are like family to me, and to my family. I am very aware of the horrors of WWII and the evil crimes of the Nazis, and the complicity of so many Germans (and Austrians and others). I am also very aware of how hard the Germans that I know have worked at understanding their own past, and realizing and acknowledging the full evil of what happened.

I am also very aware, as an obvious outsider, of the full horror of the attack on Dresden. I began studying it when I was very young - about fifteen years ago. I started following the reconstruction of the Frauenkirche on the web and was able to contribute a small amount to it.

When I was finally able to visit the city, it was the fulfillment of a dream.

The rebuilding is a remarkable thing. It is one of the most encouraging things in the world today.

I do not pretend to have any idea of what the people went through. But I do know something about it.

I am NOT asking that anyone tone down their disagreements (and it is not my place anyway). That is what a forum is for.

But Analyst does not agree or disagree. He turns every thread into an attack on Americans and creates some weird conspiracy connection.

The mods do nothing about it because he is not breaking rules. I know he has a right to do it he wants - and then others jump in. I have done it myself.

In this case, I wanted to make my voice heard.
__________________
"Our fears in Banquo
Stick deep; in his royalty of nature
Reigns that which would be fear'd: 'tis much he dares;
And, to that dauntless temper of his mind,
He hath a wisdom that doth guide his valour
To act in safety."

Macbeth 3:1
Reply With Quote
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 02-17-2008
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 12,096

United_States    
Re: Bombing of Dresden

I see...well as an amateur military historian, I have made it my biz to visit every battlefield I can ....I have been lucky enough to have visited Europe...I have been to Dresden....Berlin etc.....anyway...I have spoken at length with Germans and had stayed at their homes etc.....moving on from an event like ww2, with all the destruction wrought both physically and psychologically is not easy...engaging with them on this level is not easy, I never found ( except isolated incidents- young folks) an attitude that the events or that is the results were anyone’s fault other than the vicissitudes of the continent at large at that time..

and of course it depends on the ages of these folks...the older Germans seemed to feel they had to an extent the right to throw off Versailles, but also agreed that national socialism was not in the end the answer, not that they weren’t glad in the mid 30’s that they had seemed to find themselves again as a nation...but the slope became truly slippery...their overall attitude appeared to be a well worn ambivalence ..it became what it became and we paid the price...

the younger folks have had a harder time consigning what was with what is, and how that fits into that they feel is or maybe a right to feel regards a national pride....in short they feel they are being made to carry some of their fathers sins...some have a very hard time understanding why a Hitler would be able to control events to the extent he did...and why they, that generation, put up with it....
Reply With Quote
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 02-17-2008
42 Regular 42 Regular is offline
County Executive

 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: Southeastern USA
Posts: 347

   
Re: Bombing of Dresden

Well the very real threat of the Soviet Union did have a lot to do with it.
One of the few decent things the NAZI did was to honor the age old pact requiring they assist Finland in its war against Russia. Their interference in Spain was less forgivable , but would a Communist Spain have been any better than a Fascist Spain in those days?

When Hitler and Stalin temporarily Buddied up, then the world should have known that the feces would have to hit the fan.

The entire political situation world wide posed a near uncomprehensable mess.
Reply With Quote
  #88 (permalink)  
Old 02-17-2008
Wallaroo's Avatar
Wallaroo Wallaroo is offline
Secretary of Defense
Permanently Banned (you wish)

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 2,266

European_Union    
Re: Bombing of Dresden

IMHO its disgusting how the allies bombed civillian targets during WW2. They should only have bombed military/government targets even though it would have been less effective. If for nothing else, then at least to show the world that they had a higher moral than the germans. Seen in that light its hard to say that the brits and americans were the "good" guys.
__________________
Jesus was a communist!
Reply With Quote
  #89 (permalink)  
Old 02-17-2008
goober's Avatar
goober goober is offline
Vice President

 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 9,905

   
Re: Bombing of Dresden

It's really simple when you step back and look at it.
As the war neared it's end, the Allied air forces had more planes, more fuel and more aircrew than ever before, for two reasons, the production of these things was up, and the destruction of allied aircraft by the Luftwaffe was down, because of severe fuel shortages, the Luftwaffe was operating on 7% of the fuel it required to be fully operational.
The second thing was that there were fewer and fewer targets as the front moved into Germany, and as targets were destroyed.

So a lot of targets that would never have been attacked earlier, were attacked now, because someone had to come up with more target assignments every day, and every day there were fewer targets available.
__________________
“The thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine.”

Senator Thad Cochran, Mississippi (R)
on McCain

“I decided I didn’t want this guy anywhere near a trigger.”
Senator Pete Domenici, New Mexico (R)
on McCain

“My anger did not help my campaign ... People don’t like angry candidates very much.”

McCain on McCain
Reply With Quote
  #90 (permalink)  
Old 02-17-2008
42 Regular 42 Regular is offline
County Executive

 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: Southeastern USA
Posts: 347

   
Re: Bombing of Dresden

Quote:
They should only have bombed military/government targets even though it would have been less effective.
It wasn't always possible to hit purely military targets without hitting everything around them.
Daylight precision bombing was extremely costly when attacking the most heavily defended central war material factories, striking at the numerous smaller industries spread around the city could often do more to halt production of strategic materials than hits on the main factories.

The destruction of a small factory which produced an ecceptionally strong wood glue prevented the germans from deploying a highly advanced Wooden Wonder Bomber similar in design to the British Mosquito Bomber.
When the Germans tried a substitute glue the Bombers fell apart in the air.

Lack of the proper bearings forced the Germans to use solid bearings on their Tanks road wheels, shortening service time between major overhaul of the suspension and giving the Tank a distinctive sound which gave away its position in combat. The Tank factories were near immune to bombing but bombing the bearing plant reduced the number and effectiveness of their tanks.

Destroying Rail switching stations in cities hampered rail traffic hundreds of times more effectively than cutting rail lines. Tanks had to be moved by rail in order to reach the front with bearings intact.

Near as I can tell every strike on a German or Japanese city could be justified by the amount of war material production in that city, or presence of a Military command center.

The Mosquito Bomber I mentioned earlier was used with some success in bombing German Military targets in cities while avoiding civilian casualties, but that was a remarkable machine.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online