Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Historical Discourse A discussion forum dedicated to history. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???
Quote:
.....edit. then the test plane has to fly back to tinian and wait for another bomb. and another. add to it the empire was under rule of Army hot heads who were dertermined to fight to the death on the beachs. even after Hiroshima they were undeterred. they claimed we didn't have another bomb. BOOM !!! Nagasaki. still no response. no test bomb was going to deter them from a fight to the death. Last edited by namvet; 08-31-2008 at 05:36 PM. |
|
|||
|
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???
Quote:
and who says the civilians are anymore expendable than anyone else? who says you get it?
__________________
|
|
||||
|
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???
We certainly could have dropped more BOOMS. And how would we be risking the lives of American flyers?
__________________
"Hard work without talent is a shame, but talent without hard work is a tragedy." -fortune cookie |
|
|||
|
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???
Quote:
Quote:
they did it right. 2 bombs 2 cities war over. |
|
|||
|
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???
Quote:
2 bombers 2 bombs its over. they played they paid. if your dad or grand dad had died in the invasion would you be here talking about it????? im off for the night............. |
|
||||
|
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???
I can't prove it, but what says they couldn't have made more? They certainly had the material. 2 bombs 2 cities war over. Correct, but was it necessary to kill so many innocent lives? Not necessarily. We might have been able to end it with tens of thousands less dead.
__________________
"Hard work without talent is a shame, but talent without hard work is a tragedy." -fortune cookie |
|
||||
|
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???
Quote:
no bombs and no invasion were neccessary. the japanese had no navy by that point, therefore no means to project their will on anyone but themselves. that would have been fine by me. But truman wanted to make a point and move on to the next war, which thankfully did not happen.
__________________
|
|
||||
|
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???
This was the first time people had to come up with a strategy to use nuclear weapons.
And it was a very small group by necessity that had the discussion, no great public debate was possible, no consultation with the great minds of the day, with philosophers and theologians and the great moralists of the time, just a few people who could only discuss it in a very closed framework. First, every Purple Heart awarded from 1945 to this very day comes from the batch ordered in preparation for the invasion of Japan. They expected the invasion to cost a tremendous amount of lives. Second, there was a secret deal with Stalin, if the war with Japan went beyond a certain date, the Soviet Union would declare war on Japan, but if the war could be ended before that date, the Soviet Union would have no part in post war Japan. Third, they only had two bombs, one design had been tested once, the other design had never been tested. Truman needed to make a decision without precedent, the reasoning went that the use of the bomb had to be dramatic, and that the second had to be used a few days later to create the impression that this would become a regular event. In fact it would have been months before another bomb was ready. Truman did consider the civilian casualties, and believed that civilian casualties would be reduced by using the bomb to bring a quick end to the war. Civilian casualties in the case of an invasion would have run into the millions.
__________________
“ The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state.” Adam Smith , The Wealth of Nations 1776 "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics" FDR's second Inaugural Address |
|
||||
|
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???
Quote:
Quote:
according to....
__________________
|
|
|||
|
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|