Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Information and Research > Historical Discourse
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Historical Discourse A discussion forum dedicated to history.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2008
Governor

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: midwest
Posts: 544

   
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJG View Post
For there to be any impact at all it needs to effect the lives of the Japanese. For that to happen the bomb must land in place where there's atleast people and roads and such so it effects the government. That way it would atleast get attention and they will know what kind of power the US holds over Japan. They didn't need to display their might while killing hundreds of thousands. Better a few thousand than hundreds of thousands.
ok. so drop it on japan but in a lightly populated area. the question is was it ready for that test???? and was the 509th bomb wing ready???? and im not sure they were. the first test here was around july 15-16. then they had to make into a bomb. transport it to Tinian. and im not sure if Truman gave permission to drop it yet. so lots of ifs, ands, buts and maybes. and you also run risk of the bomb blowing up the island on take off. oops !!!! so maybe this test was just a little risky
.....edit. then the test plane has to fly back to tinian and wait for another bomb. and another. add to it the empire was under rule of Army hot heads who were dertermined to fight to the death on the beachs. even after Hiroshima they were undeterred. they claimed we didn't have another bomb. BOOM !!! Nagasaki. still no response. no test bomb was going to deter them from a fight to the death.

Last edited by namvet; 08-31-2008 at 05:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2008
AJG's Avatar
AJG AJG is offline
Secretary of Defense
-(.::@o@::.)-

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Home of the Gay
Posts: 2,753

Massachusetts     United_States

Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by namvet View Post
ok. so drop it on japan but in a lightly populated area. the question is was it ready for that test???? and was the 509th bomb wing ready???? and im not sure they were. the first test here was around july 15-16. then they had to make into a bomb. transport it to Tinian. and im not sure if Truman gave permission to drop it yet. so lots of ifs, ands, buts and maybes. and you also run risk of the bomb blowing up the island on take off. oops !!!! so maybe this test was just a little risky
.....edit. then the test plane has to fly back to tinian and wait for another bomb. and another. add to it the empire was under rule of Army hot heads who were dertermined to fight to the death on the beachs. even after Hiroshima they were undeterred. they claimed we didn't have another bomb. BOOM !!! Nagasaki. still no response. no test bomb was going to deter them from a fight to the death.
I'm not talking about test bombs. I'm talking about the real deal. Fat man and little boy. They could have threatended the country with a larger target each time. That in my book would be a very effective scare tactic. Theaten to use it. No response. BOOM! Lands in a small small town. No response. BOOM! Lands in a slightly more populated area. No response. BOOM! Lands in a small city. By the time you reach the small city they would be very afraid of the how large the next target will be.
__________________
"Hard work without talent is a shame, but talent without hard work is a tragedy." -fortune cookie
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2008
Governor

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: midwest
Posts: 544

   
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJG View Post
I'm not talking about test bombs. I'm talking about the real deal. Fat man and little boy. They could have threatended the country with a larger target each time. That in my book would be a very effective scare tactic. Theaten to use it. No response. BOOM! Lands in a small small town. No response. BOOM! Lands in a slightly more populated area. No response. BOOM! Lands in a small city. By the time you reach the small city they would be very afraid of the how large the next target will be.
we didn't have that many BOOMS availabe. the cilvians were expendable. your risking the lives of American flyers here. but thats ok by you right???? whats more dead american to you???? sorry AJG you just don't get it.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2008
htperr6565's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
The voice of doom

 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: The Glorious Southlands of the United States
Posts: 3,457

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by namvet View Post
we didn't have that many BOOMS availabe. the cilvians were expendable. your risking the lives of American flyers here. but thats ok by you right???? whats more dead american to you???? sorry AJG you just don't get it.
i thought the use of the pilots was saving the risk of millions for the land invasion? their lives would be risked regardless of tactic, right?

and who says the civilians are anymore expendable than anyone else? who says you get it?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2008
AJG's Avatar
AJG AJG is offline
Secretary of Defense
-(.::@o@::.)-

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Home of the Gay
Posts: 2,753

Massachusetts     United_States

Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by namvet View Post
we didn't have that many BOOMS availabe. the cilvians were expendable. your risking the lives of American flyers here. but thats ok by you right???? whats more dead american to you???? sorry AJG you just don't get it.
We certainly could have dropped more BOOMS. And how would we be risking the lives of American flyers?
__________________
"Hard work without talent is a shame, but talent without hard work is a tragedy." -fortune cookie
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2008
Governor

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: midwest
Posts: 544

   
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by htperr6565 View Post
i thought the use of the pilots was saving the risk of millions for the land invasion? their lives would be risked regardless of tactic, right?

and who says the civilians are anymore expendable than anyone else? who says you get it?
the invasion was scheduled for nov or dec. why waste skilled pilots on a test bomb???? and that's what it really is. how bout if we nuke tinian????

Quote:
and who says the civilians are anymore expendable than anyone else? who says you get it?[/
the Japanese Army. thats who.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2008
Governor

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: midwest
Posts: 544

   
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJG View Post
We certainly could have dropped more BOOMS. And how would we be risking the lives of American flyers?
Quote:
We certainly could have dropped more BOOMS
prove it

they did it right. 2 bombs 2 cities war over.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2008
htperr6565's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
The voice of doom

 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: The Glorious Southlands of the United States
Posts: 3,457

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by namvet View Post
the Japanese Army. thats who.
so you are calling them an authority on how we should have behaved? clarify, please...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2008
Governor

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: midwest
Posts: 544

   
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by htperr6565 View Post
so you are calling them an authority on how we should have behaved? clarify, please...
R E A D.................the jap army had total authority over the entire country and the entire civilian population. if they said fight to the death it included the entire civilian population. and thats what they told them. no surrender. get it?????

2 bombers 2 bombs its over. they played they paid. if your dad or grand dad had died in the invasion would you be here talking about it????? im off for the night.............
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2008
AJG's Avatar
AJG AJG is offline
Secretary of Defense
-(.::@o@::.)-

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Home of the Gay
Posts: 2,753

Massachusetts     United_States

Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by namvet View Post
prove it

they did it right. 2 bombs 2 cities war over.
I can't prove it, but what says they couldn't have made more? They certainly had the material. 2 bombs 2 cities war over. Correct, but was it necessary to kill so many innocent lives? Not necessarily. We might have been able to end it with tens of thousands less dead.
__________________
"Hard work without talent is a shame, but talent without hard work is a tragedy." -fortune cookie
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2008
htperr6565's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
The voice of doom

 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: The Glorious Southlands of the United States
Posts: 3,457

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by namvet View Post
R E A D.................the jap army had total authority over the entire country and the entire civilian population.
total authority is a myth, the human race is too chaotic. The jap army was hanging on by threads, had no resources for their war machine, the only power they had was fear. would it have worked to an extent? yes. but to claim total authority is to simply attribute a mythical quality to a poor enemy for the sake of your argument. not working for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by namvet View Post
2 bombers 2 bombs its over. they played they paid. if your dad or grand dad had died in the invasion would you be here talking about it????? im off for the night.............
no bombs and no invasion were neccessary. the japanese had no navy by that point, therefore no means to project their will on anyone but themselves. that would have been fine by me. But truman wanted to make a point and move on to the next war, which thankfully did not happen.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2008
goober's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 12,143

   
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???

This was the first time people had to come up with a strategy to use nuclear weapons.
And it was a very small group by necessity that had the discussion, no great public debate was possible, no consultation with the great minds of the day, with philosophers and theologians and the great moralists of the time, just a few people who could only discuss it in a very closed framework.


First, every Purple Heart awarded from 1945 to this very day comes from the batch ordered in preparation for the invasion of Japan. They expected the invasion to cost a tremendous amount of lives.

Second, there was a secret deal with Stalin, if the war with Japan went beyond a certain date, the Soviet Union would declare war on Japan, but if the war could be ended before that date, the Soviet Union would have no part in post war Japan.

Third, they only had two bombs, one design had been tested once, the other design had never been tested.


Truman needed to make a decision without precedent, the reasoning went that the use of the bomb had to be dramatic, and that the second had to be used a few days later to create the impression that this would become a regular event.
In fact it would have been months before another bomb was ready.

Truman did consider the civilian casualties, and believed that civilian casualties would be reduced by using the bomb to bring a quick end to the war. Civilian casualties in the case of an invasion would have run into the millions.
__________________
“ The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state.”

Adam Smith , The Wealth of Nations 1776

"We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics"
FDR's second Inaugural Address
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2008
htperr6565's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
The voice of doom

 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: The Glorious Southlands of the United States
Posts: 3,457

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
This was the first time people had to come up with a strategy to use nuclear weapons.
first time people chose to formulate a nuke strategy, and first time folks chose to use them. had is not the right word.
Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
Second, there was a secret deal with Stalin, if the war with Japan went beyond a certain date, the Soviet Union would declare war on Japan, but if the war could be ended before that date, the Soviet Union would have no part in post war Japan.
This is probably the most relevant issue to the decision to use the bomb. Post-war posturing. Man. Vaporizing people as part of saber rattling with the soviets. not exactly a proud moment in american history.
Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
Civilian casualties in the case of an invasion would have run into the millions.
according to....
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-2008
Governor

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: midwest
Posts: 544

   
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJG View Post
I can't prove it, but what says they couldn't have made more? They certainly had the material. 2 bombs 2 cities war over. Correct, but was it necessary to kill so many innocent lives? Not necessarily. We might have been able to end it with tens of thousands less dead.
Im after your opinion. NOT your scorn. don't shoot the messenger. I did NOT give the order. ok?????
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 09-01-2008
Governor

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: midwest
Posts: 544

   
Re: The A Bombs Of Japan: necessary ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by htperr6565 View Post
total authority is a myth, the human race is too chaotic. The jap army was hanging on by threads, had no resources for their war machine, the only power they had was fear. would it have worked to an extent? yes. but to claim total authority is to simply attribute a mythical quality to a poor enemy for the sake of your argument. not working for me.

no bombs and no invasion were neccessary. the japanese had no navy by that point, therefore no means to project their will on anyone but themselves. that would have been fine by me. But truman wanted to make a point and move on to the next war, which thankfully did not happen.
I want your opinion. NOT your scorn. in spite of what you think i did not give the order. ok?????
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online