Re: Does the 'Tea Party' movement need a new name?
Well that raises two questions:
Originally Posted by fishjoel
1) Does that mean that acts of terrorism against non-military targets are acceptable in the face of legislative tyranny?
2) Is such an act of terrorism really the thing the Tea Party Movement wants to name themselves after? I mean, is it a threat? And the Tea Party members ARE represented by the government. Again, I'm not sure it makes sense as a label.
"He has shown you, O man, what is good. And what does the LORD require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God."