Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Humanities Issues Religion, Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin
Quote:
What I blame Adam and Eve (figuratively of course) is letting sin into the world. That is what original sin is. Because they let sin into the world we now have all the mess that exists. I'm not blaming my bad actions on them I am responsible for those. Ok God kicking them out of the Garden is (in my interpretation) a metaphor for the connectedness we lost with God. Because sin was let in the world we can no longer walk with God.
__________________
"A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent." -John Calvin Last edited by Non Sequitur; 04-18-2007 at 09:50 PM. |
|
|||
|
Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin
![]() Fr. Guido Sarducci explains “Original Sin”: In the beginning, God made the heaven and the earth; and He said: “Hey, that’s pretty good!” Then God made man in His own image to rule over all living things; but it was Friday night, and God was drunk, so man didn’t come out so good. Then, while He still had a hangover, God created woman, which only made things worse. As a consolation, God let Adam and Eve live in the Garden of Eden; but then Eve met this snake guy that told her to eat of the tree of knowledge so she could get her real estate license and sell the place for big bucks; and when God found out, He got real mad and kicked them both out. And, you know, ever since then, almost everything has gone to the Devil. |
|
||||
|
Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin
Why wasn't the snake the first one to sin by tempting Eve? Who let the snake into the world?
__________________
![]() "Do what I say or I'll hold my breath til you turn blue!" |
|
|||
|
Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin
Pity they didn't bring a shift key while they were at it.
__________________
"Jesus said: I have cast fire upon the world, and behold I guard it until it is ablaze." Gospel of Thomas |
|
||||
|
Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin
well the snake has traditionally been identified as Satan but the snake could also be temptation in general.
__________________
"A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent." -John Calvin |
|
|||
|
Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin
wow your contribution here is so engaging. thanks for bringing life to this discussion.
|
|
||||
|
Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin
And the second half of my questions? Who let the snake into the world? If it was God, why did He? If it wasn't, the whole thing becomes even more intriguing.
__________________
![]() "Do what I say or I'll hold my breath til you turn blue!" |
|
||||
|
Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin
If we are talking about the snake as temptation (or even Satan as the ultimate representation of temptation) we let him in. We were the ones who decided God isn't enough (that is the "sin" if you will in original sin thinking you need something and God to be happy, not just God).
__________________
"A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent." -John Calvin |
|
|||
|
Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin
God is not as popular as in times past. The biblical representation is rather forbidding and out of date. One would think that, given human nature, God would be more forgiving and lovable for being so demanding of man’s adulation. W. Somerset Maugham said that he found it difficult to believe in a god who was less compassionate and tolerant of human failings than he was himself. In his autobiography, he wrote: “Men are passionate, men are weak, men are stupid, men are pitiful; to bring to bear on them anything so tremendous as the wrath of God seems strangely inept.” W. Somerset Maugham, The Summing Up (1938).
The philosopher Epictetus once said that it was incumbent to acknowledge the existence of the gods and make sacrifice to them. After all, what would they be otherwise but dead statues? For it is not what adorns the temple, but he who worships and adores it that makes the divinity. Perhaps, rather than issuing commandments, God would do better with a good publicist. |
|
|||
|
Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin
Quote:
__________________
"A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent." -John Calvin |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|