Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Humanities Issues
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Humanities Issues Religion, Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2007
Non Sequitur's Avatar
Non Sequitur Non Sequitur is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Saginaw
Posts: 1,067

United_States     Netherlands

Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin

Quote:
Originally Posted by MareTranquility View Post
If the theological message is the same, why are there more than 2500 sects of Christianity in the world today? Why is there sectarian violence? Why are some sects embacing diversity while others are condemning it?
I think he is referring to specific message of Genesis 1 which is God created the world and we made a mistake (incredibly boiled down but hey). You might be hard pressed to find a Christian who disagrees with those concepts.

As for different denominations there are an awful lot (and some of them a little more crazy then others). Frankly though most of the divisions in Christianity aren't over large theological issues but over small things (women in the pulpit, homosexuality, and stuff like that).
__________________
"A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent."
-John Calvin
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2007
Non Sequitur's Avatar
Non Sequitur Non Sequitur is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Saginaw
Posts: 1,067

United_States     Netherlands

Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark_Twain View Post
And I disagree with Non all the time.

And Non, I attend a Unitarian gathering quite often. The very name "Unitarian" speaks to the fact that not all people who study the Gospels believe in the Trinity.

Really, you should get out more often. . .
i get out a lot (although Unitarian hasn't been on the list since i lived on the east coast). I wasn't trying to assert that all Christianity hold original sin (or that all doctrines of it are the same) just that for a large portion of the faith (Lutherans, Catholics, the various reformed strains) the doctrine is alive and well.

oh and i welcome your disagreement
__________________
"A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent."
-John Calvin
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2007
Josepha's Avatar
Josepha Josepha is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson
Posts: 1,157

   
Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin

To say something of the fact that, God created the Garden, tree, snake, and people involved - then when he screwed up, he decided to punish everyone born. Then, in order to fix things, he got a girl pregnant, and arranged to have the child killed.

The happy pagan dancing skyclad - in the knowledge creator and creation are one and the same - seems to possess are more cogent philosophy.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotten View Post
How can you sacrifice yourself for someone when you're immortal? Jesus didn't die for us, since he's all up and kicking in the sky. And why did he do this to forgive us?

Couldn't he just forgive us without him going through all the miseries of life? To me that's pretty masochistic (wanting to go through pain). I wouldn't mind someone going through lots of stuff to save me, but I'd rather them save me without all the sticky-wicked stuff. Did God do all this for self-aggrandizement?
__________________
And there is distrust in Washington. I am surprised, frankly, at the amount of distrust that exists in this town. And I'm sorry it's the case, and I'll work hard to try to elevate it." --George W. Bush, Jan. 29, 2007
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2007
Josepha's Avatar
Josepha Josepha is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson
Posts: 1,157

   
Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin

Any prophecy is a severe misinterpretation of a book 4,000+ years older than Christ - taken by force and created from blood and smoke.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Non Sequitur View Post
To the first part: this is the beauty of the trinity. God the son (Jesus) did die. as the creed says "he was crucified died and was burried. On the third day he rose again." because Jesus is fully human (along with being fully divine) he can die and did. Now yes he is alive and up in heaven because he was raised from the dead, but for three days he was very much dead.

To the second part: there are many reasons why Christ went through all suffering
first, to overcome the spiritual death of mankind. Spiritual death is what separates mankind from God, the source of All Creation. All mankind is naturally born apart from God, which is the consequence of original rebellion by Adam and Eve (back to the original topic) against God, by doubting His Word.
Second, by taking sin upon Himself, Christ was able to justify, vindicate, pardon and clear the penalties of sin. Because of Christ, God accepts the sinner who was born apart from Him as now having been made righteous through Jesus. Only God's Gift of His Son to the world can justify mankind. There is nothing mankind can do to justify himself before God.
Third, Christs death is the fulfilment of prophecy and declares that Jesus is The Messiah, proof of His Deity; completes victory over sin and its penalty of physical and spiritual death; enables His Righteousness to be shared as well as His Eternal Life and is the assurance for believers that their bodies will also be resurrected at His Second Coming as promised; to sit at God's Right Hand and to send The Holy Spirit
Ok there are lots more theological reasons that i don't hold, like sacrifice theology (basically says "someone has to pay so it's going to be Christ"). So thats a good start for why.
__________________
And there is distrust in Washington. I am surprised, frankly, at the amount of distrust that exists in this town. And I'm sorry it's the case, and I'll work hard to try to elevate it." --George W. Bush, Jan. 29, 2007
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2007
Non Sequitur's Avatar
Non Sequitur Non Sequitur is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Saginaw
Posts: 1,067

United_States     Netherlands

Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josepha View Post
Any prophecy is a severe misinterpretation of a book 4,000+ years older than Christ - taken by force and created from blood and smoke.
ok well I don't particularly feel like going through every Christ reference in the Old testament because there are too many but a main one is the suffering servant passage in Isaiah (52:13-53:12). Micah chapter 5 is another good one. Now i will say that the interpretation of these verses only makes sense from the Christ perspective.

For that argument to work the authority of Bible has to be held in some respect and if you don't hold that then yes it all sounds crazy. the point remains with the other two reasons i gave and the array of others that i think are not theologically sound.
__________________
"A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent."
-John Calvin
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2007
Josepha's Avatar
Josepha Josepha is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson
Posts: 1,157

   
Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin

It is a misinterpretation.

The only way to give the young xtian church legitimacy as the monotheistic religion was to steal the holy writings of the only other monotheistic religion and then say the new one both predicted and superceded it.

"Old" Testament writing are best interpreted by those who wrote them - within the paradigm for which they were written. Those who conquer by force, and prophecize in retrospect, aren't worthy of belief.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Non Sequitur View Post
ok well I don't particularly feel like going through every Christ reference in the Old testament because there are too many but a main one is the suffering servant passage in Isaiah (52:13-53:12). Micah chapter 5 is another good one. Now i will say that the interpretation of these verses only makes sense from the Christ perspective.

For that argument to work the authority of Bible has to be held in some respect and if you don't hold that then yes it all sounds crazy. the point remains with the other two reasons i gave and the array of others that i think are not theologically sound.
__________________
And there is distrust in Washington. I am surprised, frankly, at the amount of distrust that exists in this town. And I'm sorry it's the case, and I'll work hard to try to elevate it." --George W. Bush, Jan. 29, 2007
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2007
Non Sequitur's Avatar
Non Sequitur Non Sequitur is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Saginaw
Posts: 1,067

United_States     Netherlands

Re: The Theological Fiasco of Original Sin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josepha View Post
"Old" Testament writing are best interpreted by those who wrote them - within the paradigm for which they were written. Those who conquer by force, and prophecize in retrospect, aren't worthy of belief.
See if i didn't believe in Christ i would accept this position, but i believe. Christ has changed the entire character of the Bible, people, and the world.
__________________
"A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent."
-John Calvin
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Release Candidate 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online